At 8:22 PM -0400 9/26/02, David W. Fenton wrote: >On 26 Sep 2002 at 20:05, David H. Bailey wrote: > >> I, for one, like the way it is implemented and have no confusion working >> with it. > >You like seeing 1:23 go to 2:1 and then 2:31 going to 3:1 and then >3:89 going to 90 and then 3:121 (which is displayed only as "121") >going to 4:1, etc.?
Yep. That way it tallies with the measure numbers of the piece of paper I am most probably working from. Although I admit that 3:121 would probably be more clear to me than simply 121. Christopher _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
