On 27 Sep 2002 at 11:03, Jari Williamsson wrote: > David W. Fenton writes: > > > You like seeing 1:23 go to 2:1 and then 2:31 going to 3:1 and then > > 3:89 going to 90 and then 3:121 (which is displayed only as "121") > > going to 4:1, etc.? > > For your example, how about changing the program option to "Display > Actual Measure Numbers" instead?
A useless suggestion, as it then makes it substantially harder to refer back to an original source. > > You seem to not have considered that my lone measure 90 falls in the > > middle of the piece, in section 3 of a piece with 7 measure number > > regions. > > And you seem to not have considered people using stuff like prefix/suffix > for the measure numbers. Should these users get all measure numbers > displayed even wider than they now get, just because you've decided that > everyone needs to see the region reference all the time (even for > situations where there is one single measure of ambiguity in the whole > piece)? ??? I'm not talking about the measure numbers in the score, just the numbers in the measure number textbox in the Finale status bar while in scroll view. It's plenty wide enough to include this. -- David W. Fenton | http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates | http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
