On 1/22/03 at 10:09 PM Norman Vine wrote: >David Luff writes: >> >Hard to tell but it looks like their scenery is cutoff at ~15 miles >> >and you can't really tell from jpegs and don't know what LOD >> >is being shown in the 'snaps' but I would guess that this is >> >several < 2 - 4 > meter per pixel imagery >> > >> >> Its 10 meter per pixel. > >OK - > >it looked a litle better then that but I guess it is over zoomed
Whoops, your judgement was right and my memory was wrong! I emailed the author some time ago asking and I've found my archived reply: "It's very approximately 4.7m/pixel" I was wrong about the website as well - that's jpegs at 2m per pixel, it's a magazine cover DVD with the whole country on that's at 4m per pixel (jpegs). Ack - must make mental note not to assume my memory works anymore :-( Nice area BTW - do you live in the displayed area? Cheers - Dave _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
