On Monday 09 October 2006 01:14, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > Quoting bass pumped : > > Thanks for the reply Stuart. > > > > To see how everything would work out, I did a test run of FlightGear on > > the machines to see how they would run. I immediately hit 2 small > > problems. > > > > 1. The maximum resolution of FlightGear is 1600x1200, while that of the > > television displays is higher (19xx X 12xx... can't remember right > > now). I guess that would mean cranking down the resolution on windows, > > but suffering a black border to the image ( I need to check on that). > > This is not true. you can use the --geometry=1920x1200 option if you want. > If you refer to the list in fgrun, it is just a short list of most common > resolutions that can be overridden in the Advanced section.
I can confirm this I am running 3200x1200 across two monitors which FG sees as one device. I don't think FG limits this in anyway as far as I can tell. If you have the hardware to support higher resolutions FG will allow you to configure it up to the hardware limits. Hal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
