I bet the reason why, is just running the source servers the fps will stay at the limited ~80fps or whatever it is, but when you start up cod4, which in itself changes the multimedia timer (like srcdsfpsboost does) so they will all use a lot more cpu. I am not sure about UT3, but I now cod4 does this.
steve grout wrote: > sorry, > > meant to say... its running off windows 2003 sp2 server q6600 4gb mem > > steve grout wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> doing some monitoring on the servers we have noticed that srcds does not >> co-exist well with other game server software..now it might be a setup >> issue our side so any help would be great.... >> >> just running 5 instances of srcds and having all the servers full, the >> cpu load goes to max 25%, as soon as we launch either a CoD4 or UT3 >> server the cpu usage goes to the 90's.. we have changed the affinite's >> of the servers so that the tf2 servers run off the first 3 cores and >> CoD4 and UT3 run off core 4. The first 3 cores are almost maxed out >> while core 4 it sitting nice at around 15%. >> >> anyone got any ideas please!? >> >> Nephyrin Zey wrote: >> >> >>> I might've spoken a bit too soon on this - the servers do still get up >>> into the high nineties CPU usage and stay there for a while - it seems >>> like after they've been running for a while their overall CPU usage >>> drifted back up to about the same as before the patch. This might be >>> the first ever case of "CPU Leaks" :-/ The server also still incurs >>> minor memory leaks, which seem to be about the same since before the >>> patch. >>> >>> I run two 32x linux servers that are nearly always full and >>> occasionally empty out at night. Here are some pretty graphs: >>> >>> http://www.nephyrin.net/NemuCPU.png >>> >>> Shows Load Average. On thursday it was lower despite both servers >>> being full (???). The big spike today is the patch. The servers were >>> both *instantly full* after the patch (among the first online) and >>> have been *constantly full* since, yet the CPU usage over the past >>> three hours has drifted up to pre-patch levels... >>> http://nephyrin.net/NemuMem.png >>> >>> Memory Usage over a longer period - note that i went from one to two >>> servers on tuesday, so the memory leaks have actually remained about >>> the same as before. >>> >>> If anyone from Valve wants a login to my stats system let me know. It >>> has tons and tons of pretty graphs dating to back when the server >>> started. >>> >>> - Neph >>> >>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Nephyrin Zey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Two patches ago levels == how it ran on the patch before the patch >>>> before goldrush. Both the patch before goldrush and the goldrush patch >>>> hurt performance, and its now at levels similar to prior to both of >>>> those. >>>> >>>> Still a bit higher than it was when i first started hosting servers, >>>> and higher than it should be, but better. >>>> >>>> - Neph >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
