Two patches ago levels == how it ran on the patch before the patch before goldrush. Both the patch before goldrush and the goldrush patch hurt performance, and its now at levels similar to prior to both of those.
Still a bit higher than it was when i first started hosting servers, and higher than it should be, but better. - Neph On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Tony Paloma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to clarify, you're saying that the performance is now better (again)? > Last update made it real bad, this update seems to have made it good again, > or at least that's what I've noticed. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nephyrin Zey > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 4:45 PM > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list; Half-Life dedicated Linux > server mailing list > > > Subject: Re: [hlds] Linux srcds performance unacceptable > > srcds performance on linux has gone down to two-patches-ago (not > counting the patches between goldrush and now) levels for me with > today's patch (though the goldrush map in particular still runs 10% > higher than something like dustbowl) and I hear windows servers got a > similar bump > > Yay valve! Keep going! > > - Neph > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
