Or through the different masses of the different chemical compounds of the chemtrails concerning gravity perhaps. Different weight masses in different layers perhaps? Those chemtrail compounds do seem to be inducing a lid effect above us of our trosphere. Those manmade cloud formations are as low as 500 ft where I live in No. Calif.
On Aug 10, 12:05 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed- there was a certain familiar [Hum like] tone buried in JDs > recording that is suitably difficult to actually figure. > At this moment I assume this makes a possible connection between hum, > gravity, or large mass movements operating through unknown mechanism > [s] > - (say neutrinos,dark matter or whatever -too exotic to be tied in by > the layman) > > On Aug 2, 2:49 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I truly believe their is more than one culprit. That is why it makes > > it so hard > > to pin down because of all of it's different sources. I have to say > > AGAIN, I think > > John Dawes is on to something with his recording vibrations. I think > > that method > > will open a flood gate of explanations. But that is just my > > laypersons opinion > > > On Aug 1, 3:44 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Until the cause is truly known ,it's not possible to say whether Hum > > > is an ELF E/M accidental by-product, a natural phenomenon or > > > intentional -for good or ill. > > > I don't think it's tinnitus, but that can't be proven- another cause > > > for frustration. It is the easiest explanation. > > > I think it could be any, but not all of them in any one individuals > > > case. > > > There may be more than one culprit though- so what may be true in one > > > place and time may not stay that way for too long. This due to the > > > freq spread reported by sufferers being quite wide from 20Hz to > > > possibly 10x this > > > Peoples' hums do seem to be fairly stable in persistence of > > > presentation, if not in volume, from what I read online. > > > Mine has a firm characteristic anyway and like most people find- it > > > seems to be un-natural. > > > The only way it's going to be nailed i m o, is for 'joint' hearers to > > > do double blind trials and then once the characteristics of detection > > > are identified used to pinpoint where the source could be, or what > > > shielding mitigates against the sound to estimate the originating > > > mechanism(s). > > > > On Jul 31, 11:18 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Come on Trev. Do you truly believe it is accidental? Truly? > > > > And the fact that we can hear it, means it is coming in at an auditory > > > > range > > > > that we are aware of. And for our ears to be aware of it, that means > > > > their > > > > is no room for error, that also our brains are aware of the sound as > > > > well. > > > > > On Jul 30, 12:16 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted text > > > > - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
