It is definitely necessary to have the "exceptions" capability, if implemented.
Regards, Richard Schuh -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Ops privs On Friday, 08/24/2007 at 04:26 EDT, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like it. > > Are you thinking of having this as a CP implementation or an ESM based > add-on function? I would not object to either but prefer a CP implementation. I'm not thinking of any particular implementation, I'm just asking for opinions on the concept of "implied consent". But now that you ask, what I've described so far is doable within CP as well as an ESM, though the ESM provides more flexibility and "exceptions" capability. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
