On 8/27/07, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you're proposing a *AUTH or something like that where you can pose a > authorization question from a user, which will be answered by whatever > is connected to *RPI?
The need to do an IUCV connection adds a lot of complexity we don't need. I think that if we want even locally written tools to exploit this, a CP command would be better. Even if that means it becomes a synchronous interface. So CP CANYOUDO <resource name> <access mode> > IUCV has the advantage that it can already be transported across ISFC, > which would allow concentrating authorization information on certain > nodes in a cluster, a useful scalability and auditability feature. I think it would be enough to get CP's answer on *this* system, whatever way CP has come to that conclusion. If CP would trust to connect to the ESM via ISFC, then CP may use that... Rob
