> -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Smith III > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 12:18 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Ops privs > > My fourth and final thought (ON THIS TOPIC) was "How about > another card -- CONTROL <user1 <user2 <user3... <usern>>>> > that would allow all of these for user1 through usern? As > z/VM evolves from an end-user environment to a guest host > environment (evolves? reverts?), things like this make more > and more sense. And would certainly continue the tradition > of native, granular control, which some Other Operating > Systems don't seem to "get"... > > ...phsiii
I think maybe it was Rob who suggested ... "Make them directory statements like the rest ... AUTOLOG, LNKNOPAS, etc.". I suppose the assumption is that CP would "bow" to the ESM, the ESM support the statement(s) (or not) ... JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
