I haven't personally done it, but others in our organization are using
Attachmate Extreme Rel 9.0
 


Marcy 

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:58 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] New CMS based SSLSERV problem... DTCSSL300E

On Thursday, 03/19/2009 at 08:39 EDT, "Mrohs, Ray" <ray.mr...@usdoj.gov>
wrote:
> Thanks Alan. Unfortunately our site is standardized on the Rumba 
> client, and the centrally managed upgrades happen once a blue moon. It

> looks like it might be a while before we can utilize the new SSLSERV, 
> even under the best circumstances.
> Is there a list of clients that have been tested and work?

- IBM Personal Communications 5.9 works
- Seagull's BlueZone works
- x3270 works
- wc3270 (Windows version of x3270) works
- Zephyr Passport works
- IBM Host on Demand fails
- Micro Focus Rumba fails
- Attachmate Reflection fails

In all cases our tests were with the levels current over the past year
or so.  We're building a more detailed list that will include the
specific levels for both tn3270 and ftp.  Note that some of the above do
not support negotiated SSL.

Those that fail will also fail with z/OS since it's the same SSL/TLS
implementation.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to