I haven't personally done it, but others in our organization are using Attachmate Extreme Rel 9.0
Marcy "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:58 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] New CMS based SSLSERV problem... DTCSSL300E On Thursday, 03/19/2009 at 08:39 EDT, "Mrohs, Ray" <ray.mr...@usdoj.gov> wrote: > Thanks Alan. Unfortunately our site is standardized on the Rumba > client, and the centrally managed upgrades happen once a blue moon. It > looks like it might be a while before we can utilize the new SSLSERV, > even under the best circumstances. > Is there a list of clients that have been tested and work? - IBM Personal Communications 5.9 works - Seagull's BlueZone works - x3270 works - wc3270 (Windows version of x3270) works - Zephyr Passport works - IBM Host on Demand fails - Micro Focus Rumba fails - Attachmate Reflection fails In all cases our tests were with the levels current over the past year or so. We're building a more detailed list that will include the specific levels for both tn3270 and ftp. Note that some of the above do not support negotiated SSL. Those that fail will also fail with z/OS since it's the same SSL/TLS implementation. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott