Erik,

This is all just adding superfluous text to an already 90+ page document.  Again what 
implementer or customer have you found that has noted a problem.  Or we just 
masturbating RFC 2461 again out of boredom.  We have so much work to do in the IETF 
here and elsewhere I don't get why this is a good use of our email time or WG time 
when nothing is broken.

What problem do you believe this solves?  

Thanks

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Erik Nordmark
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:45 AM
> To: JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå
> Cc: Soliman Hesham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
> Subject: Re: [psg.com #245] Mixed host/router behavior
> 
> > Regarding rfc2461bis, if we allow the mixed behavior, we 
> also need to 
> > clarify (at least) some other things that include:
> > 
> > - whether a mixed node can receive an RA on a "host" interface to
> >   configure a default router list
> 
> Why? Per RFC 2461 the per router list is per interface.
> There is an issue for the implementations (probably all 
> implementations) which have a per-node default router list, 
> but from the perspective of the RFC 2461 specification it has 
> already punted on all aspects of multi-interfaced hosts.
> 
> > So, (if we concentrate on the "simple" cases), I think we should 
> > emphasize that even if an interface is not an advertising interface 
> > the node still acts as a router on that interface (e.g., it can 
> > forward from/to that interface, exchange routing 
> information on that 
> > interface, etc)
> 
> Whether or not we concentrate on the "simple" case, I think 
> it makes sense to state that a non-advertising interface is 
> still one that behaves as a router e.g. the R-bit in the NA 
> should be set since another router might redirect hosts to 
> use the router that doesn't advertise itself.
> 
>   Erik
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to