Agreed. /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Abeille (jabeille) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:21 PM > To: Bound, Jim; Thomas Narten > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; Fred Baker (fred) > Subject: RE: Making IPsec *not* mandatory in Node Requirement > > Fine with this > > The important point as Kevin Kargel mentions is that there > ARE use cases where security is not required and/or > end-to-end security is not required and/or IPSec is not required. > > Julien > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bound, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 26 février 2008 13:24 > To: Julien Abeille (jabeille); Thomas Narten > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; Fred Baker (fred) > Subject: RE: Making IPsec *not* mandatory in Node Requirement > > On the contrary some of the laser sensing capabilities now > could be considered light so I guess it is what we mean by > "light" technically or from a physics/scientific view I took > it to be light controlled by sensors. > > /jim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Julien Abeille (jabeille) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:18 PM > > To: Thomas Narten > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bound, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; Fred Baker (fred) > > Subject: RE: Making IPsec *not* mandatory in Node Requirement > > > > A sensor can only sense..., you are talking about a light actuator. > > > > Julien > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Narten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: mardi 26 février 2008 12:00 > > To: Julien Abeille (jabeille) > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; Fred Baker > > (fred) > > Subject: Re: Making IPsec *not* mandatory in Node Requirement > > > > > - some applications might not require any security, e.g. a light > > > sensor = in your flat might not need it and not implement > > it, also due > > > to the = very low cost of the sensor. > > > > I agree. There is absolutely no need to prevent my neighbor > (or a bad > > guy outside my window) from being able to control/influence light > > sensors in my house. What possible harm could they do? > > > > Who needs security anyway! > > > > :-) > > > > Thomas > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
