I won't argue against the fact that security is an important part of a 
complete solution. The question for me is whether IPsec is the most 
appropriate solution for highly constrained embedded devices 
(constrained in energy, memory, compute, and link capabilities). From 
the few implementation numbers thrown around this thread, it sounds like 
IPsec is not an option for low-power wireless nodes with 8K RAM, 48K 
ROM, 128B link MTU, and not to mention that any implementation should 
leave enough space for an interesting application and should operate for 
multiple years on modest batteries.

One nice thing is that, given some application scenarios, there are 
other ways to incorporate sufficient security without the need for 
IPsec. For example, link-layer security may be sufficient for private 
networks. Link-layer security may also be sufficient if border 
routers/gateways attach to other traditional IP networks via encrypted 
tunnels.

I'm not a security expert, nor do I know the complete workings of IPsec. 
But I'd be curious if people strongly believe or have ideas on ways to 
squeeze IPsec into devices that I'm interested in. If not, is it at all 
possible to consider developing an alternative end-to-end security 
mechanism that is lightweight. I'm not arguing that this should be used 
between two traditional IP hosts, but that it can be used between a 
traditional IP host communicating with a low-power, wireless device or 
two low-power wireless devices communicating directly.

Gordon Bell observed that we've seen a new class of computing form about 
every decade. IP has so far been able to follow these trends, including 
hand held devices. Now we are at the beginning of yet another class with 
low-power wireless devices based on IEEE 802.15.4, and the 6lowpan 
effort within the IETF has set out to bring IPv6 to this new class. I'd 
be disappointed if we couldn't come to an agreement on how we can 
appropriately bring this new class into the IP framework.

--
Jonathan Hui
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to