I thought the entire point of LGPL was that it could be embedded into other
projects that had other licenses. Is this not correct? I guess I'm missing
something here.
Now, if we were talking about GPL'ed code, and not LGPL'ed code, I'd
understand. But this simply sounds like a license misunderstanding, either
by you or by me :-)
-dan
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need your advice ...
Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:42, Jon Stevens wrote:
> > I used it for my
> > http://noodle.tigris.org/ project after tearing my hair out over
> > HttpURLConnection. However, we cannot accept it for use here in Jakarta
> > land as a dependency because it is LGPL.
>
> hmm ... not using something for religious reasons? ... sad but expected.
Try legal reasons.
