on 8/23/01 9:36 AM, "Dan - Blue Lotus Software" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought the entire point of LGPL was that it could be embedded into other > projects that had other licenses. Is this not correct? I guess I'm missing > something here. > > Now, if we were talking about GPL'ed code, and not LGPL'ed code, I'd > understand. But this simply sounds like a license misunderstanding, either > by you or by me :-) > > -dan Sigh. Not another license debate. Go read the archives or something...this has been covered more times than I care to repeat... -jon
- JJAR Update Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: JJAR Update Jon Stevens
- Re: JJAR Update Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Need your advice ... Vincent Massol
- Re: Need your advice ... Jon Stevens
- Re: Need your advice ... Jon Stevens
- Re: Need your advice ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Need your advice ... Peter Donald
- Re: Need your advice ... Daniel Rall
- RE: Need your advice ... Dan - Blue Lotus Software
- Re: Need your advice .... Jon Stevens
- Re: Need your advice ... Jon Stevens
- Re: Need your advice ... Peter Donald
- Re: Need your advice .... Jon Stevens
- Re: Need your advice .... Peter Donald
- Re: Need your advice .... robert burrell donkin
- Free software, again? ... Alex Fernández
- Re: Free software, aga... Peter Donald
- Re: [definitely OT] Re... Peter Donald
- RE: Free software, aga... Dan - Blue Lotus Software
- Re: JJAR Update Peter Donald