No, you guys are the perfect example of the problem. Just the same way that SWT generated more zealots than applications, now we've got OSGi advocacy-by-accusation... and still virtually no meaningful apps to prove that this stuff is important, viable, or even worth caring about.
Just because something is in Eclipse, doesn't mean it is or should be everyone else's standard. Making Eclipse the standard of value for the Java community has been a disaster. I'm not picking a fight... I opted out of the Java world a long time ago. I think it's just sad how you guys are self-destructing. Java could have been so much more. --Chris On Jun 27, 9:59 am, Eric Newcomer <enewco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perfect example of the problem. > > There are no technical arguments for having two Java module systems, > so the strategy is to pick a fight and blame the other guys. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
