Steve wrote: > I know that Dick (and probably the rest of the posse) has had enough > of the discussion (can't blame them) however I suspect that an > interview with people from some of the major projects who are using > OSGi would provide more insight into why it is (or isn't) "important, > viable or worth caring" about than discussions with people from the > OSGi alliance or Jigsaw. > Yes, OSGi is hugely important in some subspaces of Java right now, but...
Jigsaw and OSGi aren't targeted at the same problem space. It really seems like /some/ OSGi supporters are disturbed that there might be another (almost certainly simpler) solution to part of the problem space in the future. I certainly do understand concerns about how OSGi and Jigsaw are /really /going to work together, though. -- Jess Holle --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
