Colin,

I was not thinking of you in my remarks.

Kakki


> I really object to the implication that I was casting any >aspersions(or
whatever that damned word is) on Kakki >or anyone else. I have no reason to
dislike Kakki
> nor her 'politics' which i know little about anyway.
> If I was going to attack anyone I would do it obviously. No wonder there
is so much trouble around when people place meaning on things that was not
intened.

Reply via email to