Hmmm, probably a mistake to not read my EMails for 3 days after Friday!?!? One thing that this particular thread raised that I think has been missed is what Rick posted originally, i.e. ...
> "The result was 75.02% in Bates' favour. However, the ballot papers we > were > given rounded the value of debt down to the nearest £1000 to ease the > voting > process. So for all 20 year ST holders, we were given £3000 of voting > power, > even though for some the debt was much more. Likewise, small traders had > their votes rounded down too. > Why were the 20 year ST holders and for that matter any other FOOTBALL DEBTORS allowed a vote? They are not 'creditors' in so much as their debts are safe (Along with their bully's, it takes the time for the boards to turn ... ) and therefore are not owed anything, they don't have to accept the penny in the pound pittance as their debt is secure! A lot of these voters will be anti Bates (Particularly the likes of Rick who has a sort of conflict of interest here, so sureley they should be taken them out the equation Cheers StigOfTheDump _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
