Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 12:09 -0600, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Since I'm assembling hardware to get myself a Linux system, I'm thinking
of getting an SSD device (the older type or the newer M.2 type such as
Samsung 960 EVO).
I assume that going through the entire LFS installation from square one
will work with these devices. But are there any downsides to using them,
as opposed to using exclusively hard drives? Will compiling LFS run
significantly faster if I install the host Linux system on the SSD?
Years ago I installed a host system (Fedora) on /dev/sda and LFS on
/dev/sdb with no problems.
Alan
As mentioned in my previous email, I got a Sumsung 250GB SSD 960 EVO M.2 .
Apparently the M.2 SSD drives are much faster than the SATA SSD drives.
FYI, the device shows up as /dev/nvme0n1.
Curious. Mine shows up as /dev/sda
$ sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Model=Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 250GB, FwRev=EMT21B6Q,
SerialNo=S24BNXAG800503F
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
