Hello Shadow On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:52:22 PST, shadow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 13-Feb-05, Conster wrote: > > C> Therefore, if I'm living in a duplex, apartment, or even next door to > C> someone brewing up crank or crystal Meth in the bathroom, the chemicals > C> involved are deadly and extremely volatile. If the fumes don't kill you > C> and yours or damage their lungs, the potential explosion might just do a > C> real number on you. This is how I see the rights being infringed and if > C> the cops didn't come and remove the characters, I would feel it was > C> within my rights to have them remove, with or without force. Most Meth > C> heads don't understand what planet they are on, so force is usually > C> necessary. I don't mean going in there with guns blazing, but if that is > C> the only means available to get these chemical brewing freaks out of the > C> neighborhood, so be it. I wouldn't think it bad if a little vigilantism > C> was involved. No one wants a Meth lab in their neighborhood. > >In a Libertarian world, your neighbors wouldn't be making meth next door - >Eli Lilly and Company would, in a proper chemical plant, and its products >would be available at 7-11 and Circle K, cheaper and cleaner than your >neighbors could make. Isn't this like the biggest assumption one could make? Seriously.. Why would a "Libertarian" world not have the same criminal element that now exist in our world. We aren't talking about heaven here, we are talking about the same world with a different political party. To believe that every thing would be wonderful and it would be like "We're not in Kansas anymore Toto." isn't realistic at all. Conster _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
