On 8/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Lowell C. Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in part: > > >You are correct that the rank-and-file is unhappy about the growing size > of > >government and some of the reasons for the bloat. But I suspect that > there > >was a similar discontent regarding FDR's flip but that some Dems at that > >time stayed with FDR out of party loyalty. There could be some of the > same > >dynamic occurring with the Reps now. > > Could be (both cases), and that would be interesting. It would demonstrate > the efficacy of political activity -- that it's possible to get into > positions of trust and then use that trust to produce a lasting change in > direction. (It'll take a few more years to see if that's the case with > Republicans.) That would be all the more reason to encourage libertarians > to get involved in conventional politics.
Can I get an exact number of years you are willing to give them before you will admit they are not going to get us any closer to a libertarian ideal? Travis _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
