On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:19:45AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote:
> > Agrred.  Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the
> > once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be
> > expected. I've been using Firebird since it's early days, and it's
> > quite good. Nevertheless, 0.7 has more of a propensity to "just go
> > poof" (TM)  than earlier versions; segfault I presume.  Perhaps I
> > should resume the practice of getting the CVS versions.
> 
> Hmmm  I don't think I've ever seen .7 go poof....   Perhaps it's your 
> .....   naw  I won't go there...  :-)
> 
> But it's been rock solid here.

I've been getting the same problem as Collins myself (on Slackware 9.1). 
Being too lazy to build it myself, I've been using the pre-built version 
with xft enabled. I just attributed it to that fact. Did you build your
own by any chance?

HAND

Myles

-- 
Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Calgary, AB, Canada eh?
Slackware-9.1 + CLI + Mutt-1.4.1i + Lynx|Links|eLinks
With all that power, who needs a bloated GUI ??
Alberta Mirror for Linux-SxS.Org: http://linux-sxs.org/
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to