At 03:01 PM 7/17/99 -0700, you wrote: >On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 04:32:37PM -0400, Gene Marsh wrote: >> >There are clearly other, higher, priorities. The White Paper, the >> >Green Paper, the MoU with NTIA all quite clearly state that the >> >stability of the Internet is the highest priority of all, etc. >> >> OK, granted. Now, please detail to me what ICANN is doing to ensure the >> stability of the Internet? > >Making sure that the root server system doesn't collapse because of >Y2K is the most vivid example, little noted here. Esther: "Hi JIm. Are the roots Y2K complient" Rutt: "Yup." Esther: "Great, thanks. You have a great day, Jim" Boy, I can sleep nights now. -- Richard Sexton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone http://killifish.vrx.net http://www.mbz.org http://lists.aquaria.net Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada, 70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD +1 (613) 473-1719
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- RE: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Joe Sims
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpo... sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on p... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail ... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Joe Sims
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpo... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpo... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Joe Sims
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpo... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on p... Gordon Cook