> Actually in both cases you shouldn't use x, but × or × > Good point. But will a screen reader find '×' and say 'times', or for that matter Andrew's unicode alternatives?
If so, I'd be as happy to use that as I am to use '&' instead of '&'. > In this cases × is a shortcut to times and by, but > technically we cant call it abbreviation. We could use > abbreviation as closest by meaning element, but it sounds > little bit dirty, isn't it? > Use dirty code or use harsh language. Tough call. Ricky ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
