On 2/8/07, Dmitry Baranovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Actually in both cases you shouldn't use 'x', but × or ×
>> Good point. But will a screen reader find '×' and say
>> 'times', or for
>> that matter Andrew's unicode alternatives?
>
> There's a key question. Anyone got a screen reader handy to test it?
> Sadly I don't...
Add to this "Will search engines correctly understand such a
symbols?" The answer is "No".
Compare:
3×4 http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=3%D74&btnG=Search&meta=
3x4 http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=3x4&btnG=Search&meta=
3 4 http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=3+4&btnG=Search&meta=
As you can see first and last results are equal, which means that
Google ignore × symbol. Try this two links as well:
Why do we care if Google understands the ligature? 3x4 doesn't seem
like a keyword I would optimize for when it comes to SEO...
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net .. designtocss.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
