On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:21:14PM +0000, Steve Mynott wrote: > Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The trouble that I found with gnus the last time that I used it was that > > when it wa doing something, it locked your emacs up. Which is a pain if > > you were trying to edit some perl code at the same time. > > I am not sure what you mean by "lock up". > > I have no problems in editing perl, IRC and reading mail/news together > it works fine for me and all I have to do is switch between the > buffers in the normal emacs way. I have tried this on several > platforms (solaris, linux and OpenBSD) and have never seen it lock up.
I'm talking more about accessing news rather mail, over an nntp connection to a slow server. My emacs process would stop responding and painting the screen until it had gotten a response from the server. This got to be enough of a pain that I no longer use gnus to read news. Actually, I no longer read news, but that's a different story entirely. :-) > However I am unable to compose a mail in mutt (or rather the spawned > editor) and at the same time view previous messages or browse the > address book (as I can with gnus). > > So for me it's mutt that seems to lock up. Agreed. But mutt was designed around multiple instances[1]. -Dom [1] And emacs wasn't. It bugs me to see people fire off yet another emacs copy to make a single edit to a single file. Swap, swap, swappity swap! -- | Semantico: creators of major online resources | | URL: http://www.semantico.com/ | | Tel: +44 (1273) 722222 | | Address: 33 Bond St., Brighton, Sussex, BN1 1RD, UK. |