Hi, ext Jeremiah Foster wrote: > I am hesitant here, some of the testing process may require source > packages, either now or in the future. I am not certain that non-free > packages deserve to get all the free quality assurance that the > community provides. I think they should be grateful that they are > included at all and if they want to go through testing, they need to > at least provide a source package.
I think this had been discussed before. At least I remember a reply from Henrik (Mauku developer) explaining in quite plain English why even if source code availability is the ultimate resource for good testing, in practice most apps go through the QA without anybody checking that source, and even many tools analyzing power consumption and performance will check the binaries and not the source packages. So the questions is in fact non-technical: - Do you want non-free apps showing up in http://maemo.org/packages/repository/qa/fremantle_extras-testing/ ? - Do you want non-free apps showing up in http://maemo.org/downloads/Maemo5/ ? Note that they are different questions. One possibility is that non-free or commercial publishers find interesting the maemo.org QA process per se, aiming to release the final versions in Ovi or their own channels, where no such betatesting infrastructure and culture exists. Testers with a strong opinion about open source might not be interested at all on this, but other users might be indeed interested in becoming betatesters of a non-free app in exchange of checking the lastest versions some days/weeks before regular users get them in Ovi or elsewhere. Some comments in this thread ask why "the community" should put extra work testing non-free apps. In fact "the community" doesn't exist as such. If you don't want to test non-free apps then don't test them,. If everybody thinks like you nobody will test these apps and it will be irrelevant that they are in extras-devel or extras-testing. But perhaps their presence is actually interesting to some. Perhaps the fact that they are available for testing as beta versions bring actually more testers to the QA process. And perhaps some of these guys start helping testing other apps, free or non-free. My personal opinion is that maemo.org has been always strong in open source but not exclusive, just like Maemo itself. In practice many users and developers got their first contact with free software thanks to this hybrid approach, and now some of them are in the first row of OSS evangelists. -- Quim Gil open source advocate Maemo Devices @ Nokia _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
