Carlos A. Tirado wrote: >Ah... That's more around the expected rate. But I wonder if in this case >is the Micosoft version of SMB that's holding things back. Are these two >machines Linux machines or is one working under a Microsoft OS. I get around the same numbers here too. The only machine on my LAN that has less throughput than that is unfortunately my Amiga (: Otherwise there's a Linux RedHat 6.2, Windows 2000 Professional, NT 4 PDC and a Windows98 client. For me at any rate the bottleneck is the cnet.device. /Jonas -- To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe miami-talk-ml" to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". For help on list commands send "help" to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
- [Miami] [Offtopic] Samba Performance Carlos A. Tirado
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT) Ron Jensen
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT) Carlos A. Tirado
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT) Simo Tuominen
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT) Carlos A. Tirado
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT... Jonas Thorell
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance (OT... Simo Tuominen
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance... Carlos A. Tirado
- [Miami] Re: Samba Perform... Roy Schilderman
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Roy Schilderman
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Carlos A. Tirado
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Martin Steigerwald
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Martin Steigerwald
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Roy Schilderman
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Martin Steigerwald
- [Miami] Re: Samba Performance Roy Schilderman
