OK, so that explains a lot of the mangled language on this list. Some of us
are UK-ish. "Two cultures separated by a common language...", etc?
What I am getting from all this is that we are comparing consciousness to
the internet, i.e. it is something that exists, but you must be "plugged-in"
or "online" to use it. The gooey(sp) grey stuff might be considered the
necessary Hardware, with the operating system already installed. The
software is programmed in over time. I know, I'm making a lot of assumptions
here, but my undisciplined mind tends to work this way right now.
The human "body of knowledge" exists as a huge complex of SQ which is
evolved by DQ. Is this an accurate statement? Since it takes "evolution" (a
slow-moving form of DQ) to upgrade our hardware, we are forced to
continually develop our software to improve our perception, awareness, and
Quality of life, no?
I enjoyed the Boundary Institute site. It clarified a few things for me, but
asks more questions than it answers.
Cheers,
=GC=
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of elephant
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MD Consciousness/Awareness/the property market in London
>
>
> No, obviously I don't think consciousness is *essentally*
> attached to any SQ
> history. I was merely observing that in language we do, in fact,
> so attach
> it. E.G. 'Got up this morning...[insert blues here]'. (I'm going to play
> lucille now...)
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
