> With all due respect, I think you are vastly underestimating the > difficulty of providing robust, efficient, well tested code for your > benefit. There's tens of thousands of lines of code been put into the > MPIR library, and to just dismiss it all as a joke because you found > something which you don't like in our benchmark, is really flippant.
Hmmm,,, read the following lines: "Some of the program benchmarks that we have in our full benchmark suite tell a completely different story, putting MPIR well ahead for those sorts of things. They show that in an overall program, we do quite well." You wrote them. You used a fake argument to say that MPIR is "well ahead" of another project. Was this flippant? >From my point of view it simply is falsehood, and a 10 lines patch proves it for me. This is not acceptable for me. Comparison between projects must be fair! Why should I trust you when you will say that your new algorithm is correct? Gian.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
