That's all rubbish and you know it. My reply to you, which you keep quoting, was in reply to you where you are talking about Case's benchmarks. It was in that context.
You lied. You cheated. And you know it. Still waiting on those 10 line patches. One to speed up nextprime and one to implement a proper mpn_mulmod_2expp1 in 10 lines. You can use GMP 5 if you like. Do you think we'll have them before lunch tomorrow? Maybe next week? Nah, we won't see it from you because it is non-trivial. MPIR does something GMP doesn't do. And there's *nothing* you can do to fix it unless you put a *hell* of a lot of work in! Unfair? Maybe. CHEATING? Definitely not. We put the work in. You are the one who cheated. Bill. 2010/1/11 Gianrico Fini <gianrico.f...@gmail.com>: >> it wasn't a fake argument at all. Your claim was that these Core 2 >> benchmarks of Case's show that MPIR is only faster for multiplication >> above 100000 digits and nothing else. But that is completely *false*, >> (his benchmarks didn't show that at all - you lied, and his benchmarks >> only included a small selection of things). >> >> Amazing how you just *completely ignored* the next_prime benchmark he >> printed (let alone the other timings that were faster). Oh, and there >> just happens to be around 800 lines of new code in MPIR for the >> next_prime function! > > Sorry, I did not see them, I glanced his results an I did notice what > I wrote. I missed something, sorry again. > >> As Case checked, it returns the same answer as GMP up to >> 100,000,000,000. So I very much doubt we are cheating! > > I'm not saying you are cheating with Case, I said your bench_two is > cheating, and YOU used exactly that bench_two argument with me... I'm > saying that you are cheating with me! > So, please, do not change the subject. > >> See how generous I am! > > So generous that you try to take me from a subject where my point is > strong and your is weak to a subject where you can hope to overwhelm > me... I'll check on a dictionary the meaning of "generous". > > Anyway, do not worry, you can be as "generous" as you want. I'm not > stupid. > > Gian. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
