Lyvim Xaphir wrote:

On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 03:04, SnapafunFrank wrote:



OK. You are teaching me something here but I haven't quite nailed it yet.

Re partitions:]

/dev/hda1   *           1         125     1004031   83  Linux
/dev/hda2             126        2937    22587390   85  Linux extended
/dev/hda3            2938        4434    12024652+  83  Linux
/dev/hda4            4435        4870     3502170    6  FAT16
/dev/hda5             126         250     1004031   83  Linux
/dev/hda6             251        1496    10008463+  83  Linux
/dev/hda7            1497        1559      506016   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda8            1560        2805    10008463+  83  Linux
/dev/hda9            2806        2937     1060258+  83  Linux

and:

/dev/hdb1   *           1        1827    14675346    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hdb2            1828        1829       16065   83  Linux
/dev/hdb3            1830        2491     5317515    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hdb5            1830        1841       96358+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb6            1842        1853       96358+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb7            1854        2263     3293293+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb8            2264        2295      257008+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hdb9            2296        2491     1574338+  83  Linux

Now I'm lost with the "non-FAT' statement. As you can see I have FAT on both HDDs so your reply suggested that I needed to configure things?



No, that's not what he was saying. He was just saying that the drive letter C will ONLY be assigned to partitions that winblows stuff understands, and that happens to be restricted to winblows partitions and not non-dos or non-ntfs stuff.

Technically you can have a fat anywhere you like.  I personally would
have done a type "c" which is Win95 FAT32 in LBA mode.  Most of the time
that's what win98 chooses for itself.  The file system is a little
faster and allows for larger partitions.




I do recall that when attempting to update to Mandrake 10 that lilo thought that my FAT partitions were windows OS's but I didn't see this when I went ahead with a clean install. I have fought hard with this partition problem for some time and feel that I might be missing something real simple, so forgive me for persevering. Right now everything runs fine in this regard but the next time I go to update or try something different I can see me getting balder.



What you probably ought to do is hang with what you have for a bit until you get sorted out and get all your ducks in a row, and then decide what you're layout is going to be based on what you know and what you need.

What would be handy is if you could post your /etc/fstab so that I could
see how you are mounting these partitions.  There's a simple method to
layout and then there are more unecessarily complex methods; it seems to
me that what you are doing may be a little more complex than it needs to
be.

LX




Well this could well be what it is I need to learn. I've posted the /etc/estab below for you to comment on while I go searching for some knowledge about it. Thanks for pointing it out to me.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] frank]# rpm -qa | grep checkinstall
checkinstall-1.6.0-0.beta2.1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] frank]# cat /etc/fstab
/dev/hda5 / ext2 defaults 1 1
/dev/hda1 /boot ext2 iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
/dev/hda8 /home ext2 defaults 0 0
/dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom2 auto umask=0,user,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,ro,exec 0 0
/dev/hda3 /mnt/empty ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb2 /mnt/hdb2_boot ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb5 /mnt/hdb5_root ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb6 /mnt/hdb6_var ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb7 /mnt/hdb7_usr ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb9 /mnt/hdb9_home ext2 defaults 1 2
none /mnt/removable supermount dev=/dev/sda1,fs=ext2:vfat,--,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,nosuid,nodev,kudzu 0 0
none /mnt/removable2 supermount dev=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1,fs=ext2:vfat,--,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,kudzu,codepage=850 0 0
/dev/hdb1 /mnt/win_c2 vfat umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850 0 0
/dev/hda4 /mnt/win_h vfat umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/hda6 /usr ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hda9 /var ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hda7 swap swap swap 1 2
/dev/hdb8 swap swap defaults 0 0


Looks like it could use a clean out but then I'm not sure what I'm looking at. Catch you soon I hope.

--
Regards

SnapafunFrank

Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve.
Registered Linux User # 324213



____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________

Reply via email to