>If the project team were content to be known as Indiana or some other >name that does not imply the community's exclusive endorsement without >our consent, the entire controversy would evaporate very quickly.
+1 And while rapid iteration and prototyping is fine for an "Indiana" distribution, it's NOT fine for a reference distribution. Reference distribution implies "ARC[1]" and "non controversial". An ISV cannot build anything on unreviewed prototypes then ship only to find that the prototype is changed in an incompatible manner. Casper [1] Not necessarily finished but certainly started and sticking points clear. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
