On 01/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Solaris is Solaris; OpenSolaris is a separate thing. To imply > >OpenSolaris is Solaris is a mistake no matter which distribution > >represents it. You also shouldn't make implications without claims. So > >far, Indiana has done nothing permanent that causes deviation from > >Solaris or OpenSolaris origins (unless stagnation matches your > >definition). > > Shawn, offending Solaris developers and OpenSolaris developers in a single > sentence will not help you get your point across.
I can't help it if folks are easily offended. I'm just stating things as I see them. If that's offensive, it's the choice of the person seeing it to be offended. I'm human, I can obviously be wrong. However, I don't see anything incorrect about what I stated. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
