In a message dated 05/30/2002 8:47:57 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


It seems to me that what matter most is not what worked with
350 clients in a research study but what worked with the 1 client sitting in
front of me


Well, yeah but I think you aren't going to get that second piece of info, plus, if  those 350 have some salient characterisitics in common with your one, it can be a good indication about your one.

The flip side - and please excuse the free association - during the O J Simpson trial, a certain piece of evidence was excluded, because it did not show whether he had killed his ex and friend, it was about whether he was the type of person who would do such a thing.  In court, they don not want to show whether a person is the type who would do such a thing, but whether they did it.  -- Jody

Reply via email to