> On Dec 1, 2015, at 7:16 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote: > > (1) I agree with you on the definition of these categories of Peirce. > We seem to disagree on how to assign these categories to the three worlds of > Burgin and the three roses of Scotus.
I’m not quite sure why you are applying firstness to structure where structures are inherently relations and firstness is inherently a thing in itself without relations. You seem to be using firstness due to invariant and thus structures. But I don’t see how that works. Being invariant is not the same as being unrelated.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
