We are getting quite off topic here, I assume. BLs aren't postfix, I know.
Maybe we should continue off-list, Steve? Am 10.12.2010 20:08, schrieb Steve: >>> zen.spamhaus.org should be the only spamhaus.org DNSBL in your >>> IP blocklist configuration. You should not use ZEN together with >>> other Spamhaus IP blocklists, or with blocklists already included >>> in our zones (such as the CBL) or you will simply be wasting DNS >>> queries and slowing your mail queue. >>> > The concern about the slowdown is true. But I doubt that you have > such a high inbound volume where those additional lookups would have > a significant negative impact on your delivery time. On top of that I > assume that you run some kind of local DNS cache to speedup lookups. "Yes", twice. >> What do you think? >> > This is not okay. pbl.spamhaus.org is already included in > zen.spamhaus.org. So what you should do is remove pbl.spamhaus.org > AND sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and replace it with zen.spamhaus.org. Which scores would you recommend? > On top of that some data from dnsbl.njabl.org is already included in > zen.spamhaus.org too. Maybe you should consider replacing > dnsbl.njabl.org with another DNSBL? Suggestions? > And the other issue I see above is list.dsbl.org. That DNSBL is gone > since 2009. You should definitely remove that entry from your > configuration. I see. OK > Using blocklists is not something that you add once and then forget. > You need actively to maintain the list you use and keep an open eye > on BLs and see if they are still alive and remove them if they go > down (for whatever reason). Understood ... *sigh* ;-) I am on my way to do so ... Thanks, Stefan
