-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:42:48 +0100
> Von: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <li...@xunil.at>
> An: Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com>
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: fqrdns.pcre

> Am 09.12.2010 08:19, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> > Stefan G. Weichinger put forth on 12/8/2010 5:55 PM:
> >> Am 09.12.2010 00:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> >>
> >>> * is it really making greylisting useless? I use postgrey successfully
> >>
> >> small correction: on my own servers I run policyd for greylisting, not
> >> postgrey ... ;) just to be correct, and maybe there are specific issues
> >> with policyd vs. postgrey ...
> > 
> > My comments were greylisting solution agnostic.  The pcre list plus
> > spamhaus zen is about all you need to stop most bot spam.  As always,
> > YMMV etc.  I may have omitted zen from my original post, due to the
> > assumption that everyone already uses zen anyway.
> 
> Oh, I somehow feel outdated ;-)
> 
> I use policyd-weight for BLs, so I assume I could add that zen-BL
> somewhere "before" calling pol-weight, just for testing.
> 
> Hacking pol-weight to use zen seems a bit dangerous to me as I don't
> have any clue which weight(s) to assign ...
> 
Hacking? Adding one additional BL to policyd-weight.conf is not hacking. 
Hacking policyd-weight would be if you add additional features like OS 
fingerprinting support, GeoIP support, etc...

Anyway... if you want to test ZEN in policyd-weight and want policyd-weight to 
block a client as soon the connecting IP is in ZEN then just add a score at 
least as high as the value you have for $MAXDNSBLSCORE.

> I will read this maybe:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-l...@ek-muc.de/msg00463.html
> 
> -
> 
> Aside from that:
> 
> The impact of using that pcre-list should be visible by counting less
> greylisted mail since activating it, correct?
> 
> # grep "Dec  9" /var/log/mail | grep "Policy Reject" | wc -l
> 
> or so ;-)
> 
> Thanks, S

-- 
GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos. 
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome

Reply via email to