Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > Michel Verdier via Postfix-users wrote in > <87fs4s49y5....@free.fr>: > |On 2023-08-09, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote: > | > |> do you think this would be OK, or does the hostname and IP (be it > |> localhost.local) have to be there ? > | > |Why don't you remove completely this header in your postfix using for > |example header_checks ? Received is frequently removed to hide internal > |IP if you don't need to trace them. > > Yeah the wonderful suggestion of this super helpful list (thanks > again!) for my setup (laptop postfix on "forbidden address" relays > to in-VPN postfix which then sends out) was > > 192.0.2.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o syslog_name=vpnsub > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=no > -o > smtpd_relay_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination > -o cleanup_service_name=vpnsub_cleanup > vpnsub_cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup > -o {header_checks=regexp:{{/^Received:/ IGNORE}}} > > where 192.0.2.1 is the address where postfix listens on the VPN. > Shouldn't this be adoptable? (Ie special "cleanup" service.)
We could add a section to the STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README text (and perhaps include that in SOHO_README). This could be useful even with non-VPN use cases. Wietse _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org