Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> Michel Verdier via Postfix-users wrote in
> <87fs4s49y5....@free.fr>:
> |On 2023-08-09, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote:
> |
> |> do you think this would be OK, or does the hostname and IP (be it
> |> localhost.local) have to be there ?
> |
> |Why don't you remove completely this header in your postfix using for
> |example header_checks ? Received is frequently removed to hide internal
> |IP if you don't need to trace them.
>
> Yeah the wonderful suggestion of this super helpful list (thanks
> again!) for my setup (laptop postfix on "forbidden address" relays
> to in-VPN postfix which then sends out) was
>
> 192.0.2.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=vpnsub
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=no
> -o
> smtpd_relay_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination
> -o cleanup_service_name=vpnsub_cleanup
> vpnsub_cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup
> -o {header_checks=regexp:{{/^Received:/ IGNORE}}}
>
> where 192.0.2.1 is the address where postfix listens on the VPN.
> Shouldn't this be adoptable? (Ie special "cleanup" service.)
We could add a section to the STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README text
(and perhaps include that in SOHO_README). This could be useful
even with non-VPN use cases.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
