python-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2022/01/31 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674 – Disallow using macros as l-value (version 2) Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/31 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/31 [Python-Dev] Re: [Steering-council] Re: PEP 651, Robust Stack Overflow Handling, Rejection notice Mark Shannon
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: [Steering-council] Re: PEP 651, Robust Stack Overflow Handling, Rejection notice Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Oscar Benjamin
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Jelle Zijlstra
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Mats Wichmann
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Inada Naoki
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Irit Katriel via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/30 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Ethan Smith
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] RFC on PEP 655: Required[] and NotRequired[] for TypedDict David Foster
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Inada Naoki
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Ethan Smith
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Inada Naoki
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Ethan Furman
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews Lrupert via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Blocking the main branch due to too many buildbots failing Charalampos Stratakis
• 2022/01/29 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Blocking the main branch due to too many buildbots failing Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Steve Dower
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Antonio Cuni
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Antonio Cuni
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues Python tracker
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Steve Dower
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Barry Warsaw
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Steve Dower
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Slowly bend the C API towards the limited API to get a stable ABI for everyone Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Stephen J. Turnbull
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Python no longer leaks memory at exit Simon Cross
• 2022/01/28 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] RFC on PEP 680 -- tomllib: Support for Parsing TOML in the Standard Library Shantanu Jain
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] PEP 678: Enriching Exceptions with Notes Zac Hatfield Dodds
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] Re: Python no longer leaks memory at exit Eric Snow
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] Re: Python no longer leaks memory at exit Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] Python no longer leaks memory at exit Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/27 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/26 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674 – Disallow using macros as l-value (version 2) Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/26 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674 – Disallow using macros as l-value (version 2) Larry Hastings
• 2022/01/26 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674 – Disallow using macros as l-value (version 2) Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/26 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Neil Schemenauer
• 2022/01/25 [Python-Dev] Re: Dropping AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED from configure.ac? Miro Hrončok
• 2022/01/24 [Python-Dev] SC Acceptance: PEP 673 -- Self Type Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/24 [Python-Dev] Re: Expectations of typing (was: The current state of typing PEPs) Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/24 [Python-Dev] Re: Dropping AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED from configure.ac? Christian Heimes
• 2022/01/24 [Python-Dev] Dropping AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED from configure.ac? Miro Hrončok
• 2022/01/22 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/21 [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues Python tracker
• 2022/01/21 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
• 2022/01/21 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Dan Stromberg
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Adding an `inspect` function to return the signature of a type? Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 673: Self Type Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/20 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Barry Scott
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Skip Montanaro
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Terry Reedy
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Barry Scott
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Barry Scott
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Ethan Furman
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Barry Scott
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 673: Self Type S Pradeep Kumar
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: Restated typing issue for class fields. Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: SC Acceptance: PEP 646 -- Variadic Generics Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Sebastian Rittau
• 2022/01/19 [Python-Dev] SC Acceptance: PEP 646 -- Variadic Generics Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Restated typing issue for class fields. Vincent Risi
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Jim J. Jewett
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Jim J. Jewett
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? MRAB
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Glenn Linderman
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Jim J. Jewett
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Patrick Reader
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Barney Gale
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Ethan Furman
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Steve Dower
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Ethan Furman
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] 3.11 enhanced error location - can it be smarter? Mats Wichmann
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Brett Cannon
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Richard Damon
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Steve Dower
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Antoine Pitrou
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Request to revert unittest and configparser incompatible changes in Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] Re: Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/18 [Python-Dev] PEP 674 – Disallow using macros as l-value (version 2) Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Discussion about crash tolerance feature for gdbm module Dong-hee Na
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Tim Peters
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Steve Dower
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Barry Scott
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: Fwd: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 673: Self Type Jelle Zijlstra
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 673: Self Type Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/17 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Paul Moore
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Denis Kotov
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ? Denis Kotov
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Tim Peters
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Tim Peters
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Mark Dickinson
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Mark Dickinson
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Mark Dickinson
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Terry Reedy
• 2022/01/16 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Mark Dickinson
• 2022/01/15 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Tim Peters
• 2022/01/15 [Python-Dev] Re: Changing PySequence and PyMapping checks Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/15 [Python-Dev] Re: Changing PySequence and PyMapping checks Paul Moore
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Changing PySequence and PyMapping checks Bar Harel
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] [RELEASE] Python 3.10.2, 3.9.10, and 3.11.0a4 are now available Łukasz Langa
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Tim Peters
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues Python tracker
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone using 15-bit PyLong digits (PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT=15)? Mark Dickinson
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: Fwd: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Kevin Millikin via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/14 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Matthew Rahtz via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Chris Angelico
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Kevin Millikin via Python-Dev
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Steve Holden
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Paul Moore
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Nick Coghlan
• 2022/01/13 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Batuhan Taskaya
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Neil Muller
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Dennis Sweeney
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Steven Barker
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Final Call for Comments Steven Troxler
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments Petr Viktorin
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Christian Heimes
• 2022/01/12 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Neil Muller
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674: Disallow using macros as l-value Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 674: Disallow using macros as l-value Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Eric V. Smith
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Brett Cannon
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Gregory P. Smith
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Antoine Pitrou
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Eric V. Smith
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.11.0a4 Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Minor inconvenience: f-string not recognized as docstring Antoine Pitrou
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Christian Heimes
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Antoine Pitrou
• 2022/01/11 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Paul Moore
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Greg Ewing
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 676 -- PEP Infrastructure Process Adam Turner
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 676 -- PEP Infrastructure Process Barry Warsaw
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 676 -- PEP Infrastructure Process Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] PEP 676 -- PEP Infrastructure Process python
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Core review request: bpo-33178: Add BigEndianUnion, LittleEndianUnion classes to ctypes #25480 Dave Goncalves
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Miro Hrončok
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Guido van Rossum
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Batuhan Taskaya
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Joao S. O. Bueno
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Paul Moore
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Batuhan Taskaya
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Victor Stinner
• 2022/01/10 [Python-Dev] Re: [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Erlend Aasland
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Chris Angelico
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] PEP 679 – Allow parentheses in assert statements Pablo Galindo Salgado
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Jelle Zijlstra
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Stéfane Fermigier
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Chris Angelico
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] [PSA] OpenSSL 3.0 support is preliminary and experimental Christian Heimes
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Christopher Barker
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Skip Montanaro
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: About vulnerabilities in Cpython native code Chris Angelico
• 2022/01/09 [Python-Dev] Re: About vulnerabilities in Cpython native code Stephen J. Turnbull
• 2022/01/08 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Steven D'Aprano
• 2022/01/08 [Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion: a little language for type definitions Chris Angelico

• Earlier messages
• Later messages