On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Scott Drake wrote: > I too am disappointed that after 4 months this problem still hasn't been > addressed, so much for Quality Control. But just like Mirco$oft, they have our > money now so screw us :( I am sorry for you feeling that way. What was your particular problem, again ? (sorry for not following very closely this subject-ever-changing thread...) Cristian -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Cristian Gafton -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Red Hat Software, Inc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Why is libc5 going away and... Mike Wangsmo
- Re: Why is libc5 going away and... Andreas Kostyrka
- Re: Why is libc5 going away and... Brandt Kurowski
- Re: Why is libc5 going away and... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Why is libc5 going away and... Cristian Gafton
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: ... Mike Wangsmo
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: ... Kevin Mernick
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: ... Dave Wreski
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: ... Cristian Gafton
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (... Bug Hunter
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execut... Cristian Gafton
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't ex... Greg Fall
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can'... Cristian Gafton
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH ... Scott Drake
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execut... Mike Wangsmo
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execut... Cristian Gafton
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't ex... Dave Wreski
- Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can'... Cristian Gafton