On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Bug Hunter wrote:
> I second and third that. Unfortunately, because you did _NOT_ provide
> backward compatibility of any sort, I was unable to put 5.0 into
> production. I _will_ _not_ put RH 5.1 or 5.2 or 5.x into production unless
> I can figure out ways to support older libc5 programs that may never be
> updated. (Not all linux software is freeware, surprise!) Going to 5.0
> actually would have bankrupted me had I installed it on production systems
> when it came out.
What do you mean by not supporting backward compatibility ? Netscape,
StarOffice 4.0.
What applications are you talking about ? Please quit making this general
bigus statements and get to the facts, please.
We _are_ listening.
Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Red Hat Software, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
