On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:17, Rick Johnson wrote: > Bill Anderson wrote: > > > > Given the number of people who avoid X.0 releases, waiting instead for > > X.[1,2,3] releases, I would not be suprised to see a slower adoption > > rate. Some maye even see the 8.0 -> 9.0 as a "rush" deal, and as a > > result be more likely to avoid 9.0. If you avoided 8.0 due to it being a > > .0 release, you are likely, in the general case, to avoid 9.0 for the > > same reason. > > > > If memory serves, there are people on this very list that acknowledge > > they tend away from X.0 releaes. Many suggest staying away from X.0 > > releases as well. I would think it more dramatic for these people to > > suddenly be pro-9.0. > > > > > Allow me to pass along an "official" correction from an insider - this is > Red Hat 9, not Red Hat 9.0. Surely it would be 8.1 if binary compatability > was maintained. > > -Rick
And that changes what, exactly? Seriously, if it is not a 9.0, that would imply there will be no 9.1? Does this represent a change to just 9 -> 10 -> 11 -> 12? -- Bill Anderson RHCE #807302597505773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
