RE: Allow anonymous on default Receive Connector?

2013-01-30 Thread Robinson, Chuck
You don't want to allow Anonymous on the Default Receive Connectors because 
they allow all IP's to connect.

The better answer is to create a new connector, allow anonymous and specify 
only the IP's that you are allowing to send. Also, you don't need another IP, 
Exchange will select the proper connector.

Assuming you have more than one HT server role: Be sure HT to HT SMTP is not 
load balanced, Exchange handles that already.

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bill.m...@pittcountync.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Allow anonymous on default Receive Connector?

Moving from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  We have an email appliance on the 
perimeter.  I am at the stage where I need to change the mail flow to bypass 
the 2003 server(s).  I have found several migration guides that indicate to 
simply check the box to allow Anonymous access on the default receive connector 
on the HT box(es).  IIRC, the Exchange training I took had you create a 
separate receive connector for anonymous access, which would require a separate 
IP (unless I misunderstand something).  The logic I see there would be that I 
could limit that connector to only accept traffic from desired IP's (e.g. the 
email appliance and designated internal devices).  However, we are using NLB on 
these servers for CAS functions and it would make life interesting trying to 
maintain high availability for both.

So, the question is, do most folks simply allow Anonymous on the default 
receive connector, or use a different connector?

Bill Mayo

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Retention Policy Tag

2013-01-29 Thread Robinson, Chuck
You need to specify the default folder -Type Calendar.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335226(v=exchg.141).aspx


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag

I sure am.  Thanks for asking.
I know that is the min version to be able to do this.

From: pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:57:09 +
Are you running at least SP2 RU4?

From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Retention Policy Tag

Hey guys,


I'm setting up retention policy tags to keep resource mailboxes clean in our 
staging environment and am having trouble getting it setup for the Calendar.

Here is the command I used to create it.

[PS] C:\Windows\system32New-RetentionPolicyTag -name Resource Mbx Calendar 
-AgeLimitForRetention 1 -RetentionAction deleteandallowrecovery 
-RetentionEnabled $true


As you can see it created as a personal tag instead of a retention policy 
tag.

Any idea how I can fix that?

Thanks,  Dan


[cid:image001.png@01CDFE42.D66CE5D0]
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.png

RE: Retention Policy Tag

2013-01-29 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Glad to be of assistance.

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 6:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag

Thank you Chuck, I deleted and recreated and that worked.

-Dan

From: chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:05:43 +
You need to specify the default folder -Type Calendar.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335226(v=exchg.141).aspxhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335226%28v=exchg.141%29.aspx


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag

I sure am.  Thanks for asking.
I know that is the min version to be able to do this.

From: pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Retention Policy Tag
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:57:09 +
Are you running at least SP2 RU4?

From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Retention Policy Tag

Hey guys,


I'm setting up retention policy tags to keep resource mailboxes clean in our 
staging environment and am having trouble getting it setup for the Calendar.

Here is the command I used to create it.

[PS] C:\Windows\system32New-RetentionPolicyTag -name Resource Mbx Calendar 
-AgeLimitForRetention 1 -RetentionAction deleteandallowrecovery 
-RetentionEnabled $true


As you can see it created as a personal tag instead of a retention policy 
tag.

Any idea how I can fix that?

Thanks,  Dan


[cid:image001.png@01CDFE73.EC1E1120]
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.png

RE: dag issue?

2012-05-30 Thread Robinson, Chuck
I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dag issue?

Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot 
failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the 
remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness 
get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out 
the remote node stealing quorum?

Regards

Paul.





From: Paul Cookman 
[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dag issue?

What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when 
there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I 
wanted to have an active active?

From: Steve Goodman 
[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]
Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dag issue?

If it's multi-site yep

Steve

From: Paul Cookman 
[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dag issue?

This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one 
test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases.

Would you still go with having DAC mode on?

From: Steve Goodman 
[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]
Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: dag issue?

As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout 
settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly 
nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site 
about the issue.

Steve

Sent from my iPhone

On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman 
paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote:
I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a 
two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am 
testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are 
Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the 
primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) 
databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the 
Dag to get users working again.

I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got 
quorum of the witness and then it believed that the databases were up on the 
remote site (set to Activate only and not automatic by the way). Possibly if I 
had rebooted the remote server the primary would of got quorum again and 
allowed me to mount databases?

Any thoughts on this as I need to be able to reboot the primary server if 
needed without the databases not being able to mount. I don't mind my failover 
being completely a manual process.

What do you think on what happened and a solution to my problem?

Kindest regards,

Paul.



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an 

RE: PowerShell and DC's

2012-03-07 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Get-ExchangeServer | fl Identity, currentdomaincontrollers

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com 
www.emc.com/consulting
 
Transforming Information Into Business Results

-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: PowerShell and DC's

Does any know the PS command to find out what DC's Exchange is using?  Ex 2007, 
PowerShell 2.0. 

Not much showing much on google unless I am doing something wrong.

thanks
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.  
This email transmission may contain confidential information.  This information 
is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is 
intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it from your files if 
you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for your compliance.  Copyright 
(c) 2012 Cigna 
==


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist



RE: Collecting Outlook profile information

2012-02-15 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Did you look at PST Capture?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/01/30/pst-time-to-walk-the-plank.aspx



Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010
MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008

EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Shih, Henry [mailto:hms...@ci.livermore.ca.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Collecting Outlook profile information


Is there any tool (running at a single server and scan the PC remotely) I can 
use to create a report of every user's Outlook setting at their local PCs.

Our .pst files are everywhere and we want to find out where these files are 
located and who are accessing these pst files when they open their Outlook 2007.

We are running Exchange 2003 and Outlook2007. We are in the process of 
migrating to Exchange 2010 and .pst file is a big headache to us. What should 
we do about those .pst files? We don't know where those files are located and 
how the users are connecting to those files.

What is the best strategy to handle those pst files during the migration?

Thanks.

Henry Shih
System Administrator

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2007 Autodiscovery

2012-02-09 Thread Robinson, Chuck
You might want to take a look at this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996849.aspx


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging 2010
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Autodiscovery

Greetings Gurus,

Our company was recently acquired by another company.  We are in the process of 
migrating our email from our domain to theirs.  The problem is, once a mailbox 
is moved from Domain 1 to Domain 2, if you try to login to a different computer 
(in Domain 1) than your primary computer, the local autodiscover service points 
you to Domain 1 rather than Domain 2.  S, we need to turn off the 
autodiscover service on Domain 1.  Is that easily done?

Thanks all,

Rob



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Using Search-Mailbox?

2011-09-23 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Try something like this

get-mailbox | search-mailbox -SearchQuery Received: $('1/01/2010') and 
Received: $('12/31/2011') and subject:RE: Fake Message

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging 2010
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Using Search-Mailbox?

I'm trying to pull a message from everyone's mailbox.  The following PowerShell 
command seems to work but I would like to narrow down the search by adding date 
sent, sender etc...

Get-mailbox | Search-Mailbox  -SearchQuery 'subject:RE: Fake Message' 
-DeleteContent

My question is, how do you add more than one parameter to -SearchQuery?

Thanks,
Andy


**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information transmitted in this message is 
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.

Butler Schein Animal Health

**

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Dr Site OWA

2011-07-11 Thread Robinson, Chuck
The term Client Access server array or CAS array does not apply to OWA. It 
only applies to RPC / MAPI Access.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332317.aspx

For OWA, it depends on your Active Directory topology. There a many ways to do 
this, but the simplest is to create a Network Load Balanced (NLB) array (either 
hardware of software) for each  set of CAS servers in an AD site.

For a DR only site, you could create a NLB array ahead of time and simply 
update your DNS A  record (i.e. webmail.company.com) to that IP address as part 
of your DR procedures.

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dr Site OWA

Has anyone deployed Exchange 2010 OWA at a DR site? Did you make those 
front-ends part of the same CAS Array at the primary site or did you create a 
second CAS Array?

Are there any docs/guidelines on deploying Exchange 2010 front-end services at 
a DR site?

Darren Young
Systems  Security Architect
Computing Services
University of Chicago
Booth School of Business
5807 South Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
Voice 773.702.0331 | Fax 773.702.0233


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2003 DB Not Mounting

2011-06-14 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Have you run out of Exchange Log sequence numbers?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;830408


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:cpohlschnei...@smsprotech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Exchange 2003 DB Not Mounting

Failed to mention that when trying to mount the store, I get the ID no: 
c1041724 error. I have tried following some articles that I found online to 
fix, but no luck.

From: Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 DB Not Mounting
Hello List,

I have an Exchange 2003 SP2 Enterprise DB that is not mounting. This is running 
on Windows Server 2003 Standard with SP2. Running the eseutil /mh states that 
the database is in a clean shutdown state. In the event viewer, I am getting 
errors for Event ID 494 and 454. Tried googling all of this and not really 
getting anywhere. We are basically running through a recovery server build on 
another piece of hardware to test out our procedures in case the production 
server fails. Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Chris

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Stop CAS from being used

2011-06-09 Thread Robinson, Chuck
I believe the following will do what you want.

Get-ClientAccessServer CAS01 | Set-ClientAccessServer 
-AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri $null

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Rimmel, Carl [mailto:crimm...@hfhs.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stop CAS from being used

We are running Exchange 2007 and have recently stood up a new CAS server that 
we are using for testing a 3rd party product.  We would like to stop users from 
hitting this new CAS server via autodiscover but I can't find anything that 
definitively states a way to do this.

I realize that the Service-Connection-Point that is published in AD is probably 
the primary reason that this server is being hit.

Can I just delete the SCP from AD to stop our clients from hitting this new CAS 
server?

Will removing the SCP cause anything else to fail?

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks

==

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that

may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected

from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity

to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,

disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance

on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this

email in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the

email from your computer system and shred any paper copies.



Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using

e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health

at www.henryford.comhttp://www.henryford.com for more detailed information. 
If you do not believe that

our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send

e-mail or Internet communications to us.

==

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Email Archiving Solutions

2011-06-07 Thread Robinson, Chuck
No they are not. Exchange 2010 Online Archive does not provide mobile access 
either.
These may not be an issue in your environment, but this is why you should 
define your requirements prior to looking at products.

Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Archiving Solutions

Are Exchange online archives accessible offline, if Cached Exchange Mode is 
implemented?

From: bounce-9350310-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-9350310-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Simon 
Butler
Sent: 07 June 2011 13:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Archiving Solutions

You appeared to overlooked another product - and that is the native archiving 
feature of Exchange. Was there are reason why that was overlooked?

Most third party archiving solutions require SQL server, so you should look at 
the licencing costs for that, compared to Enterprise CALs and perhaps an 
additional Exchange licence.
You can use cheaper storage for the archive and it is all integrated.

Simon.


--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.

e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://exchange.sembee.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for 
certificates from just $26.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? 
http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/

Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/



From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:kevan.dickin...@nsf-cmi.com]
Sent: 07 June 2011 11:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Archiving Solutions

All

I am currently looking into Email Archive solutions. We are running Exchange 
2010 with about 300 mailboxes. One of the main aims of this project is to 
eliminate PST files and to keep the exchange database at a reasonable size. The 
product must integrate with Outlook seamlessly, archived email must be 
available off line (cached) and available through OWA and Outlook anywhere.

I have identified 2 products that would seem to fit our criteria and would like 
to know whether anyone has experience of either product or any feedback they 
can offer about usability, features and support.

The products are Metalogix Archive Manager and MessageSolutions Enterprise 
Email Archive

Thank you in advance for any opinions that you can offer.

Regards

Kevan Dickinson
Network Manager
NSF-CMi Ltd
23 Hanborough Business Park
Long Hanborough
Oxfordshire, OX29 8SJ
Tel: 01993 885661
Fax: 01993 885603

Email: kevan.dickin...@nsf-cmi.commailto:kevan.dickin...@nsf-cmi.com
Website: www.nsf-cmi.comhttp://www.nsf-cmi.com
[Description: NSF-CMi logo]




***Disclaimer***

The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action 
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be 
unlawful.

Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, NSF-CMi Ltd and its 
subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of 
our own computer systems.

This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by 
MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run anti-virus 
software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any Email or attachment 
you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer 
as a consequence of receiving any virus.

NSF-CMi Ltd
Registered in England No: 1899857
Registered Office : Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR.

**



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 

RE: CAS array question

2010-09-16 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Use two different CAS Array FQDN's, one for each site.
In DR, you would change the DNS record to point to the surviving site. Also be 
sure you set the database property RPCClientAccessServer depending on where the 
active database is.



Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: CAS array question

I am working on my Exchange 2010 upgrade project and having a issue with the 
whole multiple site CAS array naming.

Primary Site:
Redundant CAS, HT, Mailbox servers
Split DAG to replicate to DR site
All users mailbox will be active at this site
DR site:
CAS, HT, Mailbox servers
DAG copy of mailbox databases

So I create a CAS array at each site, CASA-Primary and CASA-DR. What do I use 
for the FQDN for each CAS array?  Can I use the same FQDN in each array, say 
Outlook.company.com, and the DNS entry would point the VIP for primary site and 
in the event of site failure I would update the DNS entry to point to the VIP 
at the DR site?

How does this change if we decided to have active mailbox databases at each 
site, and to make it simple we keep on the 1 DAG?


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: What came first, the chicken or the egg????

2010-09-08 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Did you install Exchange server as a passive node? That installs Exchange but 
doesn't create a cluster.
When you run /RecoverCMS from the \Bin directory, it creates the cluster from 
the information in AD.



Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: What came first, the chicken or the egg

We are trying to do a disaster recovery test by rebuilding our Exchange 2007 
lab from the ground up.  We have recovered the Exchange 2007 Hub Transport 
Server.  Now, we are trying to recover our Exchange 2007 Clustered Mailbox 
Servers.

We have setup the Windows 2003 Cluster.  Now, we are going to the first node of 
the cluster and typing in

Exsetup.exe /RecoverCMS /CMSName:clustered_server /CMSIPAddress:x.x.x.x

It starts to run the setup, but then displays this message.

Cannot specify installation mode sine no Exchange Server is installed on this 
machine.  Try to install Exchange first.  To run the requested installation 
mode, you must specify the SourceDir parameter.  (I did an exsetup.exe /? But I 
did not found a SourceDir parameter???)

If we try to just run the.

Setup.com /M:RecoverServer

To install Exchange first, we get this message.

Cannot specify installation mode since no Exchange Server is installed on this 
machine.  Try to Install Exchange first.  The requested clustered mailbox 
server (CMS) name is not found in Active Directory.  CMS should pe present in 
the Active Directory to recover.  (I have checked Active Directory, and the CMS 
name is indeed present).

I'm perplexed.  Can anybody help?

Thanks,

Rob




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: What came first, the chicken or the egg????

2010-09-08 Thread Robinson, Chuck
It depends on whether you are trying to recover a clustered server or a 
non-clustered server.
If you are trying to recover a cluster you want to install as a passive node 
and then run /RecoverCMS.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124095(EXCHG.80).aspx



Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What came first, the chicken or the egg

I did not.  From the articles I've been looking at, they mention using the..

 Setup.com /M:RecoverServer

Command, but I don't see a switch for passive node?  What syntax should I use 
to recover Exchange AND install it as a passive node?

Thanks!


From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What came first, the chicken or the egg

Did you install Exchange server as a passive node? That installs Exchange but 
doesn't create a cluster.
When you run /RecoverCMS from the \Bin directory, it creates the cluster from 
the information in AD.



Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: What came first, the chicken or the egg

We are trying to do a disaster recovery test by rebuilding our Exchange 2007 
lab from the ground up.  We have recovered the Exchange 2007 Hub Transport 
Server.  Now, we are trying to recover our Exchange 2007 Clustered Mailbox 
Servers.

We have setup the Windows 2003 Cluster.  Now, we are going to the first node of 
the cluster and typing in

Exsetup.exe /RecoverCMS /CMSName:clustered_server /CMSIPAddress:x.x.x.x

It starts to run the setup, but then displays this message.

Cannot specify installation mode sine no Exchange Server is installed on this 
machine.  Try to install Exchange first.  To run the requested installation 
mode, you must specify the SourceDir parameter.  (I did an exsetup.exe /? But I 
did not found a SourceDir parameter???)

If we try to just run the.

Setup.com /M:RecoverServer

To install Exchange first, we get this message.

Cannot specify installation mode since no Exchange Server is installed on this 
machine.  Try to Install Exchange first.  The requested clustered mailbox 
server (CMS) name is not found in Active Directory.  CMS should pe present in 
the Active Directory to recover.  (I have checked Active Directory, and the CMS 
name is indeed present).

I'm perplexed.  Can anybody help?

Thanks,

Rob




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?

2010-09-07 Thread Robinson, Chuck
FT only supports single CPU VMs. Probably not a good fit for Exchange 2010.
HA with DAG works, but not supported by Microsoft. Ask your VMware reps about 
benefits and case studies.

If you're licensed for and using SRM, there are some pretty compelling DR 
solutions available.


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?

+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a customer.  What 
I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed on separate vSphere4 servers 
and all HA\DRS\Vmotion features turned OFF for those two virtual instances.  
Created a DAG between the two and allocated appropriate disk space per VM and 
we are rocking and rolling.  I would *love* to test VMotion win this setup, as 
I don't think the virtual instance cares where it lives... just to *see*.

Shook

Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?

Not supported.

You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?

We're currently using Exchange 2003 but should be going to 2010 in the next few 
months.

In terms of performance, a single server should do the job, so that leaves 
redundancy.

I'm interested in peoples experiences of things like vSphere Fault Tolerance 
combined with things like DAG groups?

Ultimately we're not a 24/7/365 operation but within sensible limits I want to 
make our email system as robust as I can.

Thanks.

MIRA Ltd

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration  GB 114 5409 96

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the 
intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and 
notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited.

---

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Guidance on disks for Exchange 2010

2010-07-22 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Thin provisioning is different than Virtual disks that dynamically expand.

There are many storage vendors that have specific solutions that are allow  
Exchange to be supported. 
Check out the ESRP: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/bb412164.aspx


Chuck Robinson
___
Sr. Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com 
www.emc.com/consulting
 
Transforming Information Into Business Results

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Guidance on disks for Exchange 2010

Microsoft is not in the business of supporting third party storage systems. :-P

If you call PSS and complain Exchange is slow and it's because every time a 
new block is written to the database and this causes the database to expand, 
the thinly-provisioned disk institutes a 100 ms delay to allocate that 
additional storage, why would you expect Microsoft to support that?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Guidance on disks for Exchange 2010

So, if I host my Exchange DB on a Lefthand that is thin provisioned, that's 
unsupported?

Or, continuing on my Lefthand example, I've shut down the VM, expanded the 
space allocated to the drive on which the DB resides, then use diskpart to 
expand the partition to the size of the allocated disk - this isn't supported?

It's so very vague...

Kurt

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:01, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
 Note: I am not recommending you go against published guidance from MSFT.



 That being said – that recommendation is primarily against the 
 original Hyper-V. VHDs created by the original version of Hyper-V, or 
 disks that have been upgraded from Virtual Server or Virtual PC, expand quite 
 slowly.



 Disks that are created by Hyper-V R2 are only a couple of percentage 
 points slower than fixed size VHDs. Negligible.



 I know a number of companies that are running Hyper-V R2 installations 
 with variable disks. So far, at least, it hasn’t been an issue.



 I don’t know how (or even if) this impacts VMware or XenServer.



 So….to tie this back to your question, if the storage virtualization 
 causes Exchange to notice whenever the disk expands, it’s not a good fit.



 Regards,



 Michael B. Smith

 Consultant and Exchange MVP

 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
 Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:35 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Guidance on disks for Exchange 2010



 In the virtualisation guide for Exchange 2010, in the section on 
 storage this is written:



 Virtual disks that dynamically expand aren't supported by Exchange.



 Does anyone know if this also applies to a disk presented to a 
 physical server via some form of storage virtualisation appliance?
 Said disk would be presented as 100GB, for example, and the OS would 
 see 100GB, but would grow to reach this size at the storage level.



 Thanks



 Richard






Free Busy

2010-06-24 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Anyone see this before:


* Exchange 2007 SP2

* OWA and Outlook 2007 can see userA and userB free Busy 12 months out

* Outlook 2003 can see userA Free Busy out 12 months while  userB Free 
Busy only shows to end of August 2010




Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


RE: Free Busy

2010-06-24 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Yes I did.

Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Oz Casey Dedeal [mailto:telne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Free Busy

Did you run  outllok with  /CleanFreeBusy  switch on the problems user profile? 
if not give it a try.

/CleanFreeBusy (this one clean all kinds of weird calendaring issues)


http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2007/04/collection-of-some-random-useful.html

Good luck
ocd




On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Robinson, Chuck 
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com wrote:
Anyone see this before:


• Exchange 2007 SP2

• OWA and Outlook 2007 can see userA and userB free Busy 12 months out

• Outlook 2003 can see userA Free Busy out 12 months while  userB Free 
Busy only shows to end of August 2010




Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results



--
Oz Casey Dedeal
Systems Engineer
MVP (exchange)
MCITP (EMA), MCITP (EA), MCITP (SA), MCSE 2003| M+| S+ | MCDST | 
Security+|Project+| Server+|
http://smtp25.blogspot.com (Blog)
http://telnet25.wordpress.com (Blog)
http://telnet25.spaces.live.com  (Blog)
telne...@gmail.commailto:telne...@gmail.com
https://www.mcpvirtualbusinesscard.com/VBCServer/Odedeal/interactivecard



RE: Free Busy

2010-06-24 Thread Robinson, Chuck
UserA and UserB both publish 12 months of Free/Busy.

It turns out that the previous Outlook /CleanFreeBusy for UserB was done 
using Outlook 2007. I just ran Outlook /CleanFreeBusy for UserB using Outlook 
2003 and now free busy is available using Outlook 2003 for that user.


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Free Busy

PF vs. web service issue, I'm sure. Outlook 2003 doesn't know about the 
availability web service.

userB Free/Busy options publication timeframe vs. userA's?

I don't have OL 2003 anymore anywhere, so I can't hunt that down in the 
interface. Probably something like Tools - Options, Calendar tab, Free/Busy 
Options button.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Free Busy

Anyone see this before:


* Exchange 2007 SP2

* OWA and Outlook 2007 can see userA and userB free Busy 12 months out

* Outlook 2003 can see userA Free Busy out 12 months while  userB Free 
Busy only shows to end of August 2010




Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


RE: Store brought down by a user today

2010-06-17 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Mailbox Quotas, active monitoring and proper amount of disk capacity for 
overhead is a good start.




RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

2010-06-15 Thread Robinson, Chuck
The Quest tools are Feature Rich but they have their fair share of technical 
issues.

Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

Went through this at my former employer, only we were going from our Ex 2007 
environment to their Ex 2003.
We did a pretty thorough evaluation of the Quest tools - they are VERY nice and 
don't seem to miss anything.  Not cheap, but money was not the primary concern 
in this case.

Our problem was time-to-implementation.  When a vacant suit says do it now 
because he/she can't see another vacant suit's calendar - you don't get a lot 
of time to work with scheduling professional services from Quest.  Our sales 
rep told me that they will not sell the product without Prof Services, and they 
needed 2-3 weeks to get someone on site, so

We went with Plan B which is not as elegant and involves the users more 
heavily, but still works.  In the end, it probably took the same amount of 
time, but a whole lot more work to do it the way we did, but we had to give the 
empty suits some warm fuzzy feelings that we were getting on it right away.

sigh  Good times...good times.

Jim

Jim Holmgren
Manager of Server Engineering
XLHealth Corporation
The Warehouse at Camden Yards
351 West Camden Street, Suite 100
Baltimore, MD 21201
410.625.2200 (main)
443.524.8573 (direct)
443-506.2400 (cell)
www.xlhealth.com



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

Well, if you want it to be perfect, you should look at the quest tool.

If you just are concerned about the data, use Outlook 2007+ and export the PFs 
to a PST on the far side and import them on the near side.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

We have an all Exchange 2007SP2 environment. We are acquiring a company with an 
Exchange 2003 (unknown SP) environment. My plan is to create user accounts in 
our domain for all the users and use exmerge/powershell to move their mailboxes 
into our domain. My problem is that they have a bunch of public folders with 
data that we need to bring over. So far, I've found that exmerge won't work on 
public folders. It looks like the inter-org replication tool may do what I need.

Does anyone have any comments/suggestions on the best way to handle this? Is 
there anything else I need to think about to migrate this properly? Will their 
free/busy info propagate in our organization when I import their calendar data?

Thanks for any ideas.

...Tim


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected 
health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is 
obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to 
third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is 
prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este mensaje incluyendo cualquier anejo es para uso 
exclusivo del (los) destinatario (s) y puede incluir informaci?n confidencial 
y/o informaci?n de salud protegida. La Ley Federal (HIPAA) establece que el 
destinatario est? obligado a mantener la informaci?n confidencial y sequra. 
HIPAA proh?be y castiga cualquier divulgaci?n a terceras personas sin 
autorizaci?n del afiliado o permitido por ley. Si usted no es el destinatario, 
redirija esta mensaje al remitente, y destruye cualquier copia existente del 
mensaje original.


RE: Coexistence 2007 and 2010 - introducing the first 2010 server - schema

2010-05-28 Thread Robinson, Chuck
All your Exchange 2007 servers should be upgraded to SP2 first, which requires 
the SP2 Schema extensions.

You'll want to run the Exchange Pre-Deployment Analyzer prior to trying to 
upgrade:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=88b304e7-9912-4cb0-8ead-7479dab1abf2displaylang=en


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Coexistence 2007 and 2010 - introducing the first 2010 server - schema

Hi all,

My company is currently running a mix of MS Exchange 2003 and 2007. The first 
E2k7 servers have been installed from the first Exchange 2007 version release 
media (No SP1 or SP2 at that time), so the schema was upgraded without SP2 and 
therefore I would like to get confirmation from you whether or not a schema 
upgrade is needed to install the first Exchange 2010 server.

Thanks in advance.

Al.


RE: Silly sigs - was DPM 2007 (no SP1)

2010-03-24 Thread Robinson, Chuck
And if we don't cut some of the big trees, little baby trees and bushes won't 
have a chance to sprout and grow to become adolescent trees, and then mommy and 
daddy big trees.


From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Silly sigs - was DPM 2007 (no SP1)

I laughed like a maniac while printing 10,000 copies of this email and 
distributing it to staff across the world via FedEx.

Had to do something to encourage carbon spewing, to prevent global cooling, and 
to release the confidential information contained in your missive..

Because, of course, information wants to be free.

Kurt

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:05, Paul Cookman 
paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote:



Paul Cookman • Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CACB57.B31CE8D0]+44(0) 844 874 1000 • 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CACB57.B31CE8D0] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CACB57.B31CE8D0]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk
 • www.selection.co.ukhttp://www.selection.co.uk/



[cid:image004.jpg@01CACB57.B31CE8D0]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Ltd accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.ukmailto:em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ



inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpg

RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007

2009-12-15 Thread Robinson, Chuck
If you are upgrading a CCR cluster, be sure to follow the following article to 
a T.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb676320(EXCHG.80).aspx

I recently had some issues where the Transport Service (Hub) and the Mail 
Submission Service (Mailbox) would not start after upgrading to SP2. Installing 
the Rollup 1 for SP2 fixed the issue.

Good luck!

Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007

I did.

I highly recommend that you NOT enable the mailbox auditing feature.  Other 
than that, no problems.


From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SP2 for Exchange 2007

I know it became available a few months ago, did you guys upgrade?
Should I?

--
Stefan Jafs

**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

**


RE: Senders SMTP address showing instead of Display Name

2009-07-31 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Sounds like you need to set your Receive Connector Authentication Mechanism 
setting to ExternalAuthoritative.

Set-Receiveconnector RC_Name -AuthMechanism TLS,ExternalAuthoritative

See the following information:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395.aspx

ExternalAuthoritative

The connection is considered externally secured by using a security mechanism 
that is external to Exchange. The connection may be an Internet Protocol 
security (IPsec) association or a virtual private network (VPN). Alternatively, 
the servers may reside in a trusted physically controlled network. The 
ExternalAuthoritative authentication method requires the ExchangeServers 
permission group. This combination of authentication method and security group 
permits the resolution of anonymous sender e-mail addresses for messages that 
are received through this connector. This replaces the Resolve anonymous 
senders function in Exchange Server 2003.




Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Senders SMTP address showing instead of Display Name

Completed a Migration within the same forest, Domain and Exchange Org form e2k 
to e2k7 and all is good.

However, anonymous smtp mail from e2k to e2k7 such as script notifications etc 
come through to Outlook showing with the smtp address in the display name 
rather than the Display Name. i.e. FirstName LastName

I have checked the Global settings - Internet Message format for that Domain 
and made sure that the Preserve Senders Display Name on Messages is checked 
which it is.

Global settings
Internet message formats
Properties of relevant domain
Advanced

Does anyone have any other suggestions of others things to look for?


Regards

John Stevens
Messaging Consultant



RE: MRM and summary report

2009-07-29 Thread Robinson, Chuck
That has been removed by design in 2007.

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/06/18/442809.aspx


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCITP:EA, Messaging / MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MRM and summary report

In Exchange 2003 when you did a mailbox policy to removed items x days old 
there was a option to send a summary report to the user or administrator.  Is 
there any way to do that in Exchange 2007 under the Messaging Records 
Management piece?  I have the policy setup and working but we liked getting the 
report for this one mailbox to validate that it was happening every week as not 
to cause the mailbox to hit its limits.

Thanks



RE: Virtual vs Physical for E2K7 Mailbox Server

2009-03-12 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Virtualized Scenario :
In a failover situation, you would be hosting all 12000 users on 2 virtual 
servers running on 1 physical host.
If utilizing CCR, that would assume you are running the two CCR passive nodes 
on the remaining physical server as well.

There is a lot more information to consider when sizing MBX servers, however my 
initial calculations says you are going to be over utilized.

In a virtual environment, consider N+1 when planning capacity.


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


-Original Message-
From: Brian Dwyer [mailto:bdw...@bne.catholic.edu.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtual vs Physical for E2K7 Mailbox Server

12000 mailboxes, 14 DB all around 100gb each currently running E2K3 2 x
FE 3 xBE - 70% of clients connect via OWA
NetApps storage tier1 allocated to Exchange
Storage and Servers located in DataCentre - with second storage unit
located on-site -opportunity to CCR passive node and DB's - have had 2
instances of loss of connectivity to data centre due to connection
failure which results in loss of email.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Thursday, 12 March 2009 10:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtual vs Physical for E2K7 Mailbox Server

How many mailboxes? What's the storage backend? How big are the stores?
What's the front-end look like?

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dwyer [mailto:bdw...@bne.catholic.edu.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Virtual vs Physical for E2K7 Mailbox Server


I have 2 x HP BL680 G5 E7450 2P 8G Servers to use as either -

Clustered mailbox server using CCR

or configure as

ESX virtual hosts to support virtual mail box server/s

Looking for a recommendation on which way to go...


thanks in advance

Brian


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the
BCEC Security Gateway, and is believed to be clean. Brisbane Catholic
Education however gives no warranties that this e-mail is free from
computer viruses or other defects. Except for responsibilities implied
by law that cannot be excluded, Brisbane Catholic Education, its
employees and agents will not be responsible for any loss, damage or
consequence arising from this e-mail.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the BCEC 
Security Gateway, and is believed to be clean. Brisbane Catholic Education 
however gives no warranties that this e-mail is free from computer viruses or 
other defects. Except for responsibilities implied by law that cannot be 
excluded, Brisbane Catholic Education, its employees and agents will not be 
responsible for any loss, damage or consequence arising from this e-mail.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



RE: Help with powershell syntax

2009-01-14 Thread Robinson, Chuck
I quite certain the ouput is an object, so you need to replace the | format 
table with a select statement.

get-mailboxstatistics -database 'servername\storage group name\database name' | 
where-object {$_.LastLogonTime -lt '01/07/2009'} | sort-object LastLogonTime | 
select Displayname,LastLogonTime


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with powershell syntax

You could pipe it to HTML, don't have access to it right now but Google is your 
friend.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Rausch, Michael D michael.rau...@nwa.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Jan 14 15:56:33 2009
Subject: Help with powershell syntax

Ok, I am trying to get a report on the number of users we have that have not 
logged into their mailbox in X amount of days.

So in my experimentation I was going for all users on a specific database that 
had no logged in since Jan 7:

get-mailboxstatistics -database 'servername\storage group name\database name' | 
where-object {$_.LastLogonTime -lt '01/07/2009'} | sort-object LastLogonTime | 
format-table Displayname,LastLogonTime



And it works just fine.

Now the part I am struggling with.  How do I get this output outside of the 
shell?  I tried adding | export-csv d:\testoneweek.csv to the end of it all, 
and it created testoneweek.csv, but inside was all garbled.  Not useable at all.

Any other commands I may be missing that might work?


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Help with powershell syntax

2009-01-14 Thread Robinson, Chuck
It is definitely possible and I'm sure there are many ways to do this.

One way I believe will work is to make the displayname output of your first 
command a variable. Then do a for-each loop and concatenate multiple get- and 
select queries in a single command.


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


-Original Message-
From: Rausch, Michael D [mailto:michael.rau...@nwa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with powershell syntax

Ok, one more question.

Get-mailboxstatistics only pulls specific mailbox information (duh).

Is there any way I can get other information into the table I am creating (like 
Alias, Department, etc) or will that prove to be un-doable in this situation?

If I add Alias to the select Displayname,lastlogontime section, it adds it as 
a header, but the field is left blank.  I understand why it doesn't pull that 
information.. Just wondering if there is a way I could perhaps merge a 
get-mailbox cmdlet in there somehow.. :)



-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with powershell syntax

I quite certain the ouput is an object, so you need to replace the | format 
table with a select statement.

get-mailboxstatistics -database 'servername\storage group name\database name' | 
where-object {$_.LastLogonTime -lt '01/07/2009'} | sort-object LastLogonTime | 
select Displayname,LastLogonTime


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.com 
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with powershell syntax

You could pipe it to HTML, don't have access to it right now but Google is your 
friend.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Rausch, Michael D michael.rau...@nwa.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Jan 14 15:56:33 2009
Subject: Help with powershell syntax

Ok, I am trying to get a report on the number of users we have that have not 
logged into their mailbox in X amount of days.

So in my experimentation I was going for all users on a specific database that 
had no logged in since Jan 7:

get-mailboxstatistics -database 'servername\storage group name\database name' | 
where-object {$_.LastLogonTime -lt '01/07/2009'} | sort-object LastLogonTime | 
format-table Displayname,LastLogonTime



And it works just fine.

Now the part I am struggling with.  How do I get this output outside of the 
shell?  I tried adding | export-csv d:\testoneweek.csv to the end of it all, 
and it created testoneweek.csv, but inside was all garbled.  Not useable at all.

Any other commands I may be missing that might work?


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Managed Default folders

2009-01-02 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Formatting got messed up, it should be the following:


Using the EMS:

get-mailboxserver | ft -property Identity, managedfolderassistantschedule

Set-mailboxserver -managedfolderassistantschedule

Or you can run it once by
Start-managedfolderassistant


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 3:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

Using the EMS:

get-mailboxserver | ft -property Identity, managedfolderassistantschedule
Set-mailboxserver -managedfolderassistantschedule

Or you can run it once by
Start-managedfolderassistant


Chuck Robinson
___
Solutions Architect
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
chuck.robin...@emc.com
www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

So how does one start the MRM process???

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

Managed Default Folders do not require Enterprise CALs. Managed Custom Folders 
do.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

Does the Managed Default Folders require Enterprise Cals? We only have 
standards.

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

Have you configured the MRM process to run? By default I believe it's 
configured to never run.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

And yes I do have it assign to myself and a few others but it's not working, I 
still have to empty my Deleted items manually.

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Default folders

Sure. You don't have it set up properly.

D'oh!

More information is required.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Managed Default folders

Anyone know why a managed default folder policy (in this case deleted items) 
wouldn't be working. E2007 SP1
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance

RE: Moving Mailboxes

2008-07-29 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Do frequent Full Backups
Move only the # of users between backups that the Log drive has space for.


Chuck Robinson
___
Senior Practice Consultant
MCSE: Messaging
EMC Consulting
Phone: 732-321-3644 | Mobile: 973-865-0394
[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting

Transforming Information Into Business Results

From: Karsten, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes

I think I got plenty of space for the logs on the server (currently 80GB free 
out of 120GB total on that particular drive).  I just verified that the log 
files are being written to the drive I thought they were.

The processor is barely being used on the box so compression wouldn't be bad.

Matt

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes

IMHO - the answer to that depends on your backup and SLA for recoverability.

Moving large mailboxes creates a lot of transaction logs.

You might want to consider increasing the amount of space you have allocated 
for the transaction logs temporarily while you're doing the mailbox moves, then 
cut it back when you're finished.

Transaction logs also compress pretty well, so you might consider enabling 
compression on the transaction log directories if you can afford the processor 
load without it hurting your performance too much.




From: Karsten, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Moving Mailboxes

Exchange Server 2003 SP2.

We have always had all of our users (around 1200) in one large store.  This 
single store had grown to be around 400GB.

A while ago we decided to start moving all of our users out of this store and 
into several different stores organized based on desired configuration.  We 
then began moving mailboxes out of the large store in groups into the other 
stores.  This has been going fine for our smaller users.  We now have hit a 
point where we are at our users that have larger mailboxes (200mb - 2gb).  As I 
am moving them in groups, the stores keep dismounting.  Looking at the event 
logs it appears that they are dismounting because the logs are filling up.

I did more looking and it appears that the easiest way to fix this is to enable 
circular logging.  Reading more on circular logging, there seem to be mixed 
opinions on whether it should be enabled or not.

So I guess I have 2 questions.
1.  Is circular logging the way to go to deal with this?
2.  If so, is there anything I need to watch out for?

I had been planning just to enable it to finish the mailbox moves and then just 
turn it off.

Matt Karsten




**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

**







~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest

2008-06-11 Thread Robinson, Chuck
If you install Exchange 2007 into a forest that did not have Exchange 2000 / 
2003 then no.

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest

Hi all,

Is it possible to add in an Exchange 2003 server to a Forest which has a 
running Exchange 2007 server?

Thanks
Rob




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Email address policies - ex2007

2008-05-30 Thread Robinson, Chuck
The use object may not be set to automatically update based on the policy.
You can run the following powershell to set all users to be updated via the 
policies.

Get-Mailbox | Set-Mailbox -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled $True

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email address policies - ex2007

I have made some config changes to the 'Default Policy' on our exchange server, 
removing one email address scheme and setting another as the default.

The two that I had in there before were

@sd.univ.edu  @ exchange.sd.univ.edu

The first one was the default

I made the second one the default and removed the first one along with the 
associated accepted domain.

The policy seems to have changed the default on every account but when I look 
at the email addresses of each user some still have the one I removed.  It 
looks like sometimes accounts aren't minding the policy.  Is there a way to 
force the policy to be reapplied to mailboxes or to verify that it is indeed 
updating them?

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan State University
1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email address policies - ex2007

2008-05-30 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Being the default policy should be fine.

You can run Get-EmailAddressPolicy | fl to get the details of the policy. 
Perhaps it is not applied

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email address policies - ex2007

The checkbox on the email addresses tab of each users account that says 
automatically update e-mail addresses based on e-mail address policy is 
checked.

I'm curious also the 'default policy' in the exchange console is listed as 
having the lowest priority...which assumedly is fine since it's the ONLY policy 
but could that make a difference?

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469

From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email address policies - ex2007

The use object may not be set to automatically update based on the policy.
You can run the following powershell to set all users to be updated via the 
policies.

Get-Mailbox | Set-Mailbox -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled $True

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email address policies - ex2007

I have made some config changes to the 'Default Policy' on our exchange server, 
removing one email address scheme and setting another as the default.

The two that I had in there before were

@sd.univ.edu  @ exchange.sd.univ.edu

The first one was the default

I made the second one the default and removed the first one along with the 
associated accepted domain.

The policy seems to have changed the default on every account but when I look 
at the email addresses of each user some still have the one I removed.  It 
looks like sometimes accounts aren't minding the policy.  Is there a way to 
force the policy to be reapplied to mailboxes or to verify that it is indeed 
updating them?

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan State University
1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: logging for edge synchronization?

2008-04-02 Thread Robinson, Chuck
You can turn up logging on that process.
In the EMS type Set-eventloglevel MSExchange EdgeSync\Synchronization -Level 
Expert

For a list of all Processes with Configurable Event Logging Levels see the 
following link.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb201661(EXCHG.80).aspx

Typically you can do a Set-eventloglevel and it will give you all the current 
logging levels of all processes.


Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: logging for edge synchronization?

Is there such a thing as a log file or some way for me to get more information 
on why my edge synchronization is not staying synched?  I thought it might show 
up in the App log, but no such luck.  Ops Mgr is alerting on it, so that's how 
I know it isn't working as expected.  I can start the synch manually, but I'd 
rather find the source of the problem.  Not having much luck with The Google.

Name: gatewayServer
LeaseHolder : transportServer
LeaseType   : Option
ConnectionResult: Succeeded
FailureDetail   :
LeaseExpiry : 4/2/2008 2:10:34 PM
LastSynchronized: 4/2/2008 1:10:34 PM
CredentialStatus: Synchronized
TransportServerStatus   : Synchronized
TransportConfigStatus   : Synchronized
AcceptedDomainStatus: Synchronized
SendConnectorStatus : Synchronized
MessageClassificationStatus : Synchronized
RecipientStatus : NotSynchronized

I don't know if this is a new occurrence or if it has always been the case.

Thanks,
Angie



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 TLS Encryption

2008-03-19 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Check out the Data Path Security Reference at 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb331973(EXCHG.80).aspx


Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 TLS Encryption

Can somebody tell me what port Exchange 2007 uses for TLS encryption to talk 
between two different domains???  Does it just use SMTP port 25 or something 
else?

Thanks.

Robert




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3

2008-03-18 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Yes.

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Gabe Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3
Importance: High

Currently the user receives a 0X8004010F error, an object cannot be found when 
trying to download the offline address book. Outlook 2007 clients work fine. 
Only web distribution is enabled, using ADSIEDIT the user account is pointing 
to the appropriate OAB. Do I have to enable public folder distribution of the 
OAB for Outlook 2003 SP3 clients to work?




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3

2008-03-18 Thread Robinson, Chuck
The issue is that only Outlook 2007 can get OAB from the web services.
Check out the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397221(EXCHG.80).aspx


Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Gabe Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3

Isn't SP2 for office supposed to allow Outlook to use v4 for the OAB? I know it 
will work with the public folder, but I am trying to stay away from that. Any 
other ideas? Thanks.

From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3

Yes.

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Gabe Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 - Outlook 2003 SP3
Importance: High

Currently the user receives a 0X8004010F error, an object cannot be found when 
trying to download the offline address book. Outlook 2007 clients work fine. 
Only web distribution is enabled, using ADSIEDIT the user account is pointing 
to the appropriate OAB. Do I have to enable public folder distribution of the 
OAB for Outlook 2003 SP3 clients to work?










~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

2008-01-23 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Neil, I guess that eliminates Dell hardware. J

Seriously though, according to a recent MS webcast: How Microsoft IT 
Implemented New Storage Designs for Exchange Server 2007, MS claims they are 
running 99% of the environment using CCR and DAS.

Anyone see that? I for one would like to hear some thoughts on that as well as 
CCR backup/recovery good, bad and the ugly.

 Chuck

From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?


I saw one of our customers last year who is running Exchange 2000 and wants to 
go to Exchange 2007.  No clustering is used in Exchange 2000 and no clustering 
is required for Exchange 2007 because, as far as I can remember, they said they 
had only had 1 unscheduled outage in the last 5 years.  It's amazing what can 
be done with well-redundant single servers.  J

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2008 18:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?


I would say that clustering is falling out of favor, not CCR specifically. 
Clustering adds a lot of cost and a fair bit of maintenance complexity to get a 
very small up-time improvement. And if your operations folks aren't good - it 
can lead to worse up-time instead of improved up-time.

I'm of the opinion (and it is just that - my opinion) that if you buy good 
hardware to start with (redundant fans, redundant power supplies, name-brand 
memory, etc.), that clustering isn't worth the cost.

I haven't played with Windows 2008 dispersed clusters yet. They may make it 
easier and more worthwhile. I dunno yet.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Pete Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using CCR in production?


Ive had a CCR implementation with 10 storage groups and about 200gb of data 
running on RTM code since last August with no issues. Works great, smooth and 
reliable failover ..so far. Why is CCR falling out of favor ? I can see where 
it adds some complexity in setup but the MNS style clustering makes that a lot 
easier. It does make patching more difficult .. I still need to do SP1 when I 
have a spare minute.


Pete Howard | Systems Engineer
MCSE 3.51-2003 | ESX VCP
* EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message 
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:43:00 AM
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
The first two lines are about a particular client using CCR, sorry.

The last line is a generic statement. I wasn't clear...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?


So you guys aren't using CCR or SCC Michael?

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?


30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.

Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LCR to cheap disk.

I'm seeing more folks moving away from clustering with LCR and SCR. Good 
riddance, in my opinion.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone using CCR in production?

Curious to know what folks have seen in the field when using CCR.  How many 
users, how large are your databases, any issues you've encountered.  Any 
geo-dispersed clusters, special quorum configs, and how are you backing all of 
it up?

thanks!
-alex




























~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer

2008-01-18 Thread Robinson, Chuck
The question is Would it stop this thread?
If so, I like it


Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer


Wouldn't have taken too many words to say something like A friendlier, faster, 
more cost effective alternative to Barracuda, would it? (assuming all those 
were true of course)


From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer


Whatever, it's marketing. Many may hate the tagline, but everyone will 
immediately understand what Sunbelt just released.
Alex


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer
Be wary of any product that claims to be a 'killer' of other products. It reeks 
of mediocrity or an inferiority complex.

From: Alex Eckelberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer

good point, thanks, keep it all coming.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sunbelt Announces Ninja Blade - The Barracuda Killer

 Yes there are three preconfigured levels, but you can add or delete
 any attachment rule within any of those levels.

Excellent, maybe a UI improvement is in order for a future release, this
should be an obvious and easy to change feature (like right there on
that page with the three levels as a 4th option with a customize...
button).

Thanks for the quick replies, that's a good sign. :)

~JasonG

--











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Different Disclaimers Per Domain

2008-01-15 Thread Robinson, Chuck
What version of Exchange?
For 2003, take a look at Ninja Disclaimers. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/ 
I've helped clients implement it, and for the price it is very good. You may 
have to create a Dynamic Distribution Group and configure ND for each DDG. The 
last time I used the product, it didn't dynamically update the users in a 
group. Hopefully that has changed.

For 2007, you can use Transport Rules. You'll have to do some work with the 
rule conditions, but it should be trivial.

HTH

Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspractice


-Original Message-
From: John Shaw-Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Different Disclaimers Per Domain

Hi there,

I currently have about five or six domains on an exchange server farm,
we now need to add a disclaimer to some domains - but not others, and
also different disclaimers depending on domains, anyone got any pointers
on how to do this?  Any software that's needed should be set and
forget.

Cheers

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Anybody want to save my sanity?

2008-01-15 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Did you try to manage through Exchange Management Console?


Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP
Senior Practice Consultant
EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice
tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/

From: Rausch, Michael D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anybody want to save my sanity?





So, we are beginning our transition to Exchange 2007.  So we currently have 
Exchange 2003 SP2 mailbox servers and Exchange 2007 SP1 CAS boxes.

We are having issues with Active-Sync.

Basically, active-sync needs Integrated Windows Authentication enabled on the 
2003 Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync virtual directory.  I understand this.

And according to this:

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/09/04/446918.aspxblocked::http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/09/04/446918.aspx

Note: Integrated Windows authentication for /Exchange and 
/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync virtual directories must be enabled via Exchange 
System Manager on Exchange 2003 back-end server.



And here is where I start feeling like I am going to go insane.  If I go into 
Exchange System Manager, and expand the server, expand protocols, expand HTTP 
and right click on Microsoft-Server-Activesync and go to the Access tab I see 
this:

[cid:image001.jpg@01C85772.6AD1ED10]


So needless to say I can't seem to set it there.  But if I set it using the IIS 
manager, the setting falls off after a few hours and everything breaks again.

Basically it is driving me crazy.  I am using the Exchange System Manager 
actually on the server in question, so they are at the same version level.

So what silly stupid thing am I missing here?

Thanks all

Mike Rausch





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~inline: image001.jpg