Re: Alternate directory for .qmail files
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:01:48PM -0700, Ben Schumacher wrote: > > I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an > > alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw > > somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable > > to find it again. > > You can use the qmail-users mechanism to reach the same goal. I saw something about doing that on the qmail.org page, however, this is really not the ideal solution for what I'm trying to do. My goal is to make a web based management system for this, and I'd prefer to keep most everything out of the users home directory, for the sake of security and simplicity. Basically, I want to setup another directory that will have a subdirectory for each user on the system, with .qmail files that are written by the administrative interface, and the virtual POP boxes for these users. Similar to what vpopmail does, but in a way that doesn't negate the ability to have mail delivered to good old '/var/mail/$USER' boxes for those who would rather use a shell. Thanks, Ben
Re: Alternate directory for .qmail files
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:01:48PM -0700, Ben Schumacher wrote: > I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an > alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw > somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable > to find it again. You can use the qmail-users mechanism to reach the same goal.
Alternate directory for .qmail files
Hello- I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable to find it again. If all else fails, I will just go ahead and hack away at qmail-local myself, but I was hoping somebody out there could make my job easier. Thank you, Ben
Re: Missing To:/From: Fields in Virtual Domain Setup.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:57:59 PST, wrote: > have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server > using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I > supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the > .qmail-default file?? Any help would be greatly appreciated! No, qmail will not modify those headers by default. Exchange pullmail must be removing them or they are not included with the email when it was injected into the queue. Try looking at the mail in the Maildir to see if they are present before they get pop'd. In addition, how are the messages being put into the queue? Are you doing it from a script? Are you sending it from a MUA? And no, you shouldn't have to resupply them in a .qmail-default... :-) Andy
Re: DNS Patch Unavailable
all you need to do to fix the dns problem is change a setting in your dns.c source for qmail change the word "PACKETZ" to "65536" this is according to running Qmail by sams publishing. i have hacked this code a few times with 0 problems on 5 of my servers thanks Jps > For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is > at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com > has not been responding at all. > > Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites? > > -- > John Evans > > >
Re: DNS Patch Unavailable
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:46:06PM -0500, John Evans wrote: > For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is > at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com > has not been responding at all. > > Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites? I have a copy of it at http://flounder.net/qmail/qmail-dns-patch --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes, http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA| connected to a bunch of other wires." 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A| Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_ 9:02pm up 5 days, 48 min, 7 users, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.04
Missing To:/From: Fields in Virtual Domain Setup.
Good evening! It looks like I'm on the last stretch of setting qmail up as a smart host. I do have one - hopefully last - problem. Here's what works: Standard qmail installation that works with SMTP and POP3. qmail-inject test work fine using TEST.deliver . Telnet localhost/IPADDR 25 and manually entering commands works and the message is delivered into Maildir just fine. I have pullmail running on NT machine to POP3 out of domain acct and shove it into Exchange. That works as well... My problem is, when mail arrives for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it is accepted, but the message itself no longer contains any To: or From: fields. When pullmail pops the mail from qmail server, Exchange bounces it all because there is no To: field! What have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the .qmail-default file?? Any help would be greatly appreciated! TIA .mark 1.79x10^12 furlongs per fortnight -- it's not just a good idea, it's the law!! use Disclaimer; my $opinion_only;
DNS Patch Unavailable
For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com has not been responding at all. Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites? -- John Evans
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
Inter7 writes alot of qmail software that is very ontopic for much of this list. I for one dont have a problem with them posting announcements If your opinion differs from his, thats fine. If you dont like his attitude, thats fine. But please dont suggest that his post is off topic and wasting your bandwidth. Your whining is wasting mine. Lesson - delete it, or get off the list if you dont appreciate the discussion. On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Rod... Whitworth wrote: | On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:57:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | >Not | and lots of other stuff requoting in full his promotion which, if it had | anything to do with qmail, was only of peripheral interest to a few. | | If I was ever likely to be interested in such a product this would cause me to | look elsewhere. | | Get off my bandwidth. It costs not you! -- John Gonzalez / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tularosa Communications, Inc. (505) 439-0200 voice / (505) 443-1228 fax http://www.tularosa.net / ASN 11711 / JG6416 [--[ sys info ]---] 5:00pm up 169 days, 23:29, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.16, 0.21
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:57:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Not and lots of other stuff requoting in full his promotion which, if it had anything to do with qmail, was only of peripheral interest to a few. If I was ever likely to be interested in such a product this would cause me to look elsewhere. Get off my bandwidth. It costs not you!
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
Not everyone has a single box devoted to Apache with PHP modules. In fact, many people run a large amount of time consuming processes. Efficiency is always a factor, when it can be taken into account. Web based products should always be concerned with efficiency. Mark Delany wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could > > have been. Exactly what you requested below, > > is the feature we will be adding. > > > > PHP is inefficient BTW. :) > > Totally OT, but one user registration per second adds up to 86,400 new > users per day. > > Can a small web server running PHP handle one registration per second? > Answer: yes. Does hotmail.com do more than 86K registrations per day? > Answer: no. > > Conclusion: One small webserver running PHP can handle all the > registrations for arguable the largest webmail service on the planet. > > Efficiency is not always the most relevant selection criteria. > > Regards. > > > > > Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > > > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php > > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow > > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > > > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > > > > we released early last year. If you're running > > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > > > > taking a look at. > > > > > > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > > > > which will be used to collect demographic, > > > > or any other information administrators might > > > > want during the signup process. This information > > > > might include their cleartext password, a > > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > > > > password over the phone), and other demographic > > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > > > > that whatever information you wish to collect, > > > > is easy to setup. > > > > > > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > > > > take a look at it. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
For debugging purposes you might want to run svscan manually so the errors go to the screen/window you're on. On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:25:11PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log Not unless it's some wierd Unix. svscan writes errors to stderr. You don't need kernel settings to control where that goes. > correctly??? I am on kernel 2.4.1 it's working fine on a RH 6.2 > machine with 2.2.17 (using djbdns). > > The sticky bit seemed to have no effect.. Did you restart svscan? > and nothing is being logged error-wise. Did you check the system console? Regards. > > Paul Farber > Farber Technology > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ph 570-628-5303 > Fax 570-628-5545 > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service > > > > > > and under that > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . > > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. > > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail > > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd > > > > > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude > > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? > > > > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?) > > > > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html: > > > > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, > > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free > > descriptors for each pipe." > > > > Chris > > >
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
Apparently some companies devote more time than others to their releases. Dan Phoenix wrote: > > inefficent? > alot of speed and very easy to code. > Take me 10 lines of c code for one line in php. > + it is built in apache as a module so it runs faster. > > Of course c is faster and for any kind of real software it should be used. > But for a websitephp is generally the choice. > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:30:53 -0600 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could > > have been. Exactly what you requested below, > > is the feature we will be adding. > > > > PHP is inefficient BTW. :) > > > > Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > > > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php > > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow > > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > > > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > > > > we released early last year. If you're running > > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > > > > taking a look at. > > > > > > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > > > > which will be used to collect demographic, > > > > or any other information administrators might > > > > want during the signup process. This information > > > > might include their cleartext password, a > > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > > > > password over the phone), and other demographic > > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > > > > that whatever information you wish to collect, > > > > is easy to setup. > > > > > > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > > > > take a look at it. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log correctly??? I am on kernel 2.4.1 it's working fine on a RH 6.2 machine with 2.2.17 (using djbdns). The sticky bit seemed to have no effect.. and nothing is being logged error-wise. Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service > > > > and under that > > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd > > > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? > > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?) > > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html: > > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free > descriptors for each pipe." > > Chris >
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
inefficent? alot of speed and very easy to code. Take me 10 lines of c code for one line in php. + it is built in apache as a module so it runs faster. Of course c is faster and for any kind of real software it should be used. But for a websitephp is generally the choice. On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:30:53 -0600 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could > have been. Exactly what you requested below, > is the feature we will be adding. > > PHP is inefficient BTW. :) > > Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > > > we released early last year. If you're running > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > > > taking a look at. > > > > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > > > which will be used to collect demographic, > > > or any other information administrators might > > > want during the signup process. This information > > > might include their cleartext password, a > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > > > password over the phone), and other demographic > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > > > that whatever information you wish to collect, > > > is easy to setup. > > > > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > > > take a look at it. > > > > > > -- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html >
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could > have been. Exactly what you requested below, > is the feature we will be adding. > > PHP is inefficient BTW. :) Totally OT, but one user registration per second adds up to 86,400 new users per day. Can a small web server running PHP handle one registration per second? Answer: yes. Does hotmail.com do more than 86K registrations per day? Answer: no. Conclusion: One small webserver running PHP can handle all the registrations for arguable the largest webmail service on the planet. Efficiency is not always the most relevant selection criteria. Regards. > > Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > > > we released early last year. If you're running > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > > > taking a look at. > > > > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > > > which will be used to collect demographic, > > > or any other information administrators might > > > want during the signup process. This information > > > might include their cleartext password, a > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > > > password over the phone), and other demographic > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > > > that whatever information you wish to collect, > > > is easy to setup. > > > > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > > > take a look at it. > > > > > > -- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could have been. Exactly what you requested below, is the feature we will be adding. PHP is inefficient BTW. :) Dan Phoenix wrote: > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. > > Regards, > > Dan > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > > we released early last year. If you're running > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > > taking a look at. > > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > > which will be used to collect demographic, > > or any other information administrators might > > want during the signup process. This information > > might include their cleartext password, a > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > > password over the phone), and other demographic > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > > that whatever information you wish to collect, > > is easy to setup. > > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > > take a look at it. > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it. Regards, Dan On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that > more than replaces the old vQsignup program > we released early last year. If you're running > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth > taking a look at. > > We will be adding a new feature very soon > which will be used to collect demographic, > or any other information administrators might > want during the signup process. This information > might include their cleartext password, a > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext > password over the phone), and other demographic > information such as zip codes, cities, etc. > We intend to make this fully configurable, so > that whatever information you wish to collect, > is easy to setup. > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to > take a look at it. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html >
Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that more than replaces the old vQsignup program we released early last year. If you're running vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing users to signup for free accounts, it's worth taking a look at. We will be adding a new feature very soon which will be used to collect demographic, or any other information administrators might want during the signup process. This information might include their cleartext password, a challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext password over the phone), and other demographic information such as zip codes, cities, etc. We intend to make this fully configurable, so that whatever information you wish to collect, is easy to setup. Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to take a look at it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
OT: AMaVis Help.
Thanks for reading this OT message. I've subed to the Amavis list, but hours later, I've had no confirmation! qmail is working just fine. Installed AMaVis per INSTALL & README.qmail. After making the symlinks to /usr/sbin/scanmails, I get the following error message in syslog: Feb 23 11:33:59 mail qmail: 982928039.242542 delivery 1: success: DSorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_--._(#5.1.2)/ Feb 23 11:35:41 mail qmail: 982928141.394389 delivery 2: success: DSorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_--._(#5.1.2)/ I have checked the rights to scanmails, and the symlinks and that hasn't fixed the problem. This error msg happens via qmail-inject and telnetting into 25. Removing the symlinks and rename the qmail-*-real files back to qmail-* brings the system back online. Any thoughts?? TIA .mark -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS/E/IT/O d- s+ a C$ L$> P+++$> L++ E--- W-- N+ o K- w-- !O M- !V PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t+ !5 X R- tv b+++ DI+ D- G e++ h--- r+++ z --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- 1.79x10^12 furlongs per fortnight -- it's not just a good idea, it's the law!! use Disclaimer; my $opinion_only;
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
Assuminmg you're running this all via svscan, the problem is that
svscan only notices the +t flag when it first sees the directory in
/service.
You need to remove the service and re-add it. I believe the
daemontools page at cr.yp.to has the sequence needed to do this.
Regards.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:05:23PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> Tried that...
>
>
> but it will not fire off a copy of multilog:
>
> 3181 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
> 3182 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -qDHR
> -ladmin.f-tech.net -xt
>
> here is some file info:
>
> drwxr-sr-t 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
>
> ./run=
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec 2>&1 \
> envdir ./env \
> sh -c '
> case "$REMOTENAME" in h) H=;; p) H=p;; *) H=H;; esac
> case "$REMOTEINFO" in r) R=;; [0-9]*) R="t$REMOTEINFO";; *) R=R;; esac
> exec \
> /usr/local/bin/envuidgid qmaild \
> softlimit ${DATALIMIT+"-d$DATALIMIT"} \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
> -qD"$H$R" \
> ${LOCALNAME+"-l$LOCALNAME"} \
> ${BACKLOG+"-b$BACKLOG"} \
> ${CONCURRENCY+"-c$CONCURRENCY"} \
> -xtcp.cdb \
> -- "${IP-0}" "${PORT-25}" \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> '
>
> ./run/log=
>
> [root@admin log]# cat run
> #!/bin/sh
> exec \
> setuidgid qmaill \
> multilog t ./main
>
> ./mail is empty... and there is no multilog process running
>
> Paul Farber
> Farber Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph 570-628-5303
> Fax 570-628-5545
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> > >
> > > and under that
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> > >
> > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
> >
> > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
> >
> > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
> >
> > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> > descriptors for each pipe."
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
Tried that...
but it will not fire off a copy of multilog:
3181 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
3182 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -qDHR
-ladmin.f-tech.net -xt
here is some file info:
drwxr-sr-t 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
./run=
#!/bin/sh
exec 2>&1 \
envdir ./env \
sh -c '
case "$REMOTENAME" in h) H=;; p) H=p;; *) H=H;; esac
case "$REMOTEINFO" in r) R=;; [0-9]*) R="t$REMOTEINFO";; *) R=R;; esac
exec \
/usr/local/bin/envuidgid qmaild \
softlimit ${DATALIMIT+"-d$DATALIMIT"} \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
-qD"$H$R" \
${LOCALNAME+"-l$LOCALNAME"} \
${BACKLOG+"-b$BACKLOG"} \
${CONCURRENCY+"-c$CONCURRENCY"} \
-xtcp.cdb \
-- "${IP-0}" "${PORT-25}" \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
'
./run/log=
[root@admin log]# cat run
#!/bin/sh
exec \
setuidgid qmaill \
multilog t ./main
./mail is empty... and there is no multilog process running
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> >
> > and under that
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> >
> > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
>
> chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
>
> From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
>
> "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> descriptors for each pipe."
>
> Chris
>
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
DOH The manpage I have referneces .70 but nothing about a sticky bit oh well, live and learn.. and learn and learn and learn! Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service > > > > and under that > > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd > > > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? > > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?) > > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html: > > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free > descriptors for each pipe." > > Chris >
Re: cyclog line?
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:02:57PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now according to the man page for cyclog: > > > > cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir > [...] > > Is there a space needed between the -s or not? > > No. You don't believe TFM? And... What happens when you try it both ways? Such an experiment won't create world hunger - give it a try and report and discrepancies with the documentation back to the list. Sometimes a simple experiment is going to give you a more reliable learning experience than just asking a list. Regards.
Re: cyclog line?
Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now according to the man page for cyclog: > > cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir [...] > Is there a space needed between the -s or not? No. You don't believe TFM? Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
cyclog line?
Hi All, I'm looking to make my log files /var/qmail/log hold more info before starting a new file with cyclog: I have modified my startup script line to look like this for cyclog: /usr/local/bin/cyclog -s256000 /var/log/qmail (start and end stuff left off to save space) Now according to the man page for cyclog: cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir where: -ssize (Default: 104000. Minimum: 512.) Maximum file size. After writing this many bytes to one file, cyclog will start a new file. Is there a space needed between the -s or not? I know I have to stop and start qmail for this to take effect as well (right?) -Bill
OK, another question...
No one helped me with my original problems, but I think that's because they thought I was a moron... BUT I still have faith... Here's what happens now when I send a message to myself (attached with one of the banned extensions) failure: 192.168.2.26_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_554_mail_ser ver_permanently_rejected_message_(#5.3.0)/ Here's what I have as my 'qmail-queue' in /var/qmail/bin #!/bin/sh exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qfilter /var/qmail/bin/deny-filetypes If there's no 'banned' attachment, it goes through okay... and I receive a bounce saying 192.168.2.26 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0) How do I get qmail-filter to add something about having a banned extension... ??? Again, I am using the qmail-qfilter program without using QMAILQUEUE ... Thanks!!!
Re: limit size of outbound mail?
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:47:41AM -0800, Bill Parker wrote: > Hi all, > > I know that databyte will limit the size of outbound mail > from qmail-smtpd to bytes, but which file does it go into in > /var/qmail/control? Just put the number of bytes in /var/qmail/control/databytes. The keyword 'databyte' is not used anywhere. Greetz, Peter.
Re: limit size of outbound mail?
Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know that databyte will limit the size of outbound mail > from qmail-smtpd to bytes, but which file does it go into in > /var/qmail/control? Doesn't it only restrict the size of received (incoming) mail? The file you're looking for is /var/qmail/control/databytes, and it should contain only the integer number. > On a unrelated note, I use cyclog to rotate my log files, can I > add a -size parameter to increase the size of the log file, before > it is closed, and a new one is opened? Can't comment on cyclog; it's been too long since I used it. With multilog, it would just be adding "s" to the commandline. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Mail hub for relay and outgoing only - no local
David, Thanks for the tip about the locals file. That seems to have done the trick for stopping the local deliveries. I have another problem now during testing. I have configured the new qmail server (qmail.our_lan.com) to respond as though it is our existing mail server (externalmail.com) by making defaultdomain, me, and rcpthosts contain "externalmail.com". The rcpthosts also contains "our_lan.com" so that it will accept mail from the internal servers for relaying. In order to test that the fastforward aliases I have set-up actually work, I am telnetting into the qmail server on port 25 and manually creating a message as described in the TEST.receive file. I can not just send mail from an external account as the real mail server would grab the message. For testing purposes only, I want to tell qmail *not* to query the DNS. I want it to accept that the local machine is externalmail.com, instead of resolving to the real externalmail.com. I have read in the tcpserver man page that it is apparently possible to tell qmail to ignore the DNS and use the parameters provided, but this does not seem to be working for me. My /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file looks like this: #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -g qmaild` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l externalmail.com \ -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" \ 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 Mail is still getting sent to the existing mail server at externalmail.com. I have tried adding "externalmail.com:[192.168.2.52]" (which is the IP of the qmail server) to smtproutes, but this just causes a loop. I have created ~alias/.qmail-default containing "| /var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" but qmail never seems to get to that point. I have even changed ~control/defaultdelivery to "| /var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" in the hopes that it would help, but it hasn't. I'm sure that I am missing something, but I can not figure out what. I'm sure it will be a "DOH!" when someone points it out to me. Assistance would be appreciated as I am *this* close to finishing, but am stuck on this one detail. TIA Dion Vansevenant Internetwork Administrator MRO.com Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .ornl.gov> cc: Subject: Re: Mail hub for relay and outgoing only - no local 2001/02/20 15:45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1) How do I prevent qmail from trying to deliver locally on the qmail >server? Leave control/locals empty. >2) How can I correctly set-up the group redirects in a way that will >eliminate (if not reduce) duplication due to an error sending to one >address in the group? List the members in the appropriate ~alias/.qmail-* file. >3) What would be a good way of redirecting local names to the appropriate >email address for the local messages from our Sun servers (ie: bobs -> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]): individual /var/qmail/alias files, or some other >method? .qmail files in ~alias. -Dave
limit size of outbound mail?
Hi all, I know that databyte will limit the size of outbound mail from qmail-smtpd to bytes, but which file does it go into in /var/qmail/control? On a unrelated note, I use cyclog to rotate my log files, can I add a -size parameter to increase the size of the log file, before it is closed, and a new one is opened? -Bill
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > I have > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service > > and under that > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? Hmm. Solaris manpage talks about it as does FreeBSD - you must be on Linux, right? In octal it is 1000 or symbolically, +t. Thus: chmod +t /service/qmail Regards. > > > > Paul Farber > Farber Technology > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ph 570-628-5303 > Fax 570-628-5545 > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > > > It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: > > > > > > info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0 > > > starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > > > delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/ > > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > > > end msg 224981 > > > new msg 224981 > > > info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0 > > > starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > > > delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/ > > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > > > end msg 224981 > > > > > > even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page. > > > Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries > > > to multilog using log/run ? > > > > Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory? > > > > Chris > > >
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service > > and under that > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?) From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html: "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free descriptors for each pipe." Chris PGP signature
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
I have drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service and under that drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude to it... what is the 'sticky bit'? Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > > It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: > > > > info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0 > > starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > > delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/ > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > > end msg 224981 > > new msg 224981 > > info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0 > > starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > > delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/ > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > > end msg 224981 > > > > even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page. > > Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries > > to multilog using log/run ? > > Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory? > > Chris >
Re: LWQ & OpenBSD
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > I really should let this die, but I just can't... > > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > > > >> Where does apachectl live? > > > >/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or > >stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper > >program for the sysadmin, not for the system. > > How do you start Apache if not "apachectl start"? /usr/sbin/httpd > >> How is having a simple control interface like: > >[...] > >> against "keep it simple"? > >> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands? > > > >svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send > >them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts. > > "Complex scripts"? You think think the LWQ qmail script is complex? > Give me a break! It's freakin' trivial. The script itself is everything but trivial. One Example why it is bad: you are storing svscans PID (via $!) in /var/run/svscan.pid und use this PID for killing svscan later. What if the admin has killed and started svscan in other ways before "qmail stop"? Given your favorite server prog has this PID when you issue "qmail stop"? You are killing the wrong program. Starting svscan at boottime and never stop it is the much cleaner way and fits well in BSD philosophy. And, btw, works as well on Linux. > Let's look at simplicity and complexity... Let's compare your way and > my way for some simple qmail administration tasks: > > TaskBSD LWQ > > start PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin qmail start > svscan /service & covered by /etc/rc.local, never done by hand. > stopsvc -d /service/qmail-* qmail stop > svc -d /service/qmail-*/log > > restart svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail restart > svc -d /service/qmail-*/log > PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin > svscan /service & no. svc -t /service/qmail-* multilog needs no restart usually. your example is worng, you'd have two svscans running if you do so. > rebuild cdb tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \qmail cdb > /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp right. > check queue qmail-qstat qmail queue > qmail-qread > > hup fire up web browser qmail hup > go to http://cr.yp.to > find daemontools docs > look up svc > locate HUP option > svc -h /service/qmail-send no. I'm familiar with svc as everbody running anything under svscan should be, so it is simply svc -h /service/qmail-send And you forgot "reschedule queue", svc -a /service/qmail-send qmail alrm (?) [..] > Do you > really have a local copy of the daemontools docs? Is it current? of course. But i wish Dan would include manpages... > >[Non-OS specific installation instructions] can't work. The OS > >concepts are to different. > > That's pretty sad, but it's a symptom of the gratuitous > incompatibilities that DJB rails against. And these are due to 20 > different OS packagers each doing things their own way and demanding > that developers accomodate their whims. Yes, thats true. > The LWQ qmail script works the same on all platforms. Can't BSD be > just a little flexible and allow cross-platform compatibility? svscan is the way to cross-platform compatibility. > -Dave > -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Fw: qmail-qfilter ~ Help...
I received NO responses... please help me... - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:25 AM Subject: qmail-qfilter ~ Help... : : : : Okay, I've tried to install qmail-filter and thought : I did everything correctly... but it's not filtering out : anything... : : Here's what I did... : : edited Makefile (added -DQMAIL_QUEUE=\"/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue-old\" ) : so that I didn't have to install QMAILQUEUE patch : : make (looked like it worked ok) : : mv qmail-queue qmail-queue-old : : created qmail-queue with the following: : : #!/bin/sh : exec /path/to/qmai:-qfilter /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -n : : chmod +x qmail-queue : : restarted qmail and qmail-smtpd : : Sent test message to myself with .VBS attachment (went through ok) : : Ran (in the 'samples' directory) ./deny-filetypes : : Sent another message... Still went through... : : : What I am doing wrong??? Please help, thanks!!! : : Jesse : :
Re: Cannot receive mail from some sites
Saso Dundev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can receive mail from almost all sites in the net ( for example yahoo.com), > but there are few that cannot send mail to me ( for example the usa.net > servers). They establish a connection but seize data transmition and qmail > timeouts. This could be an issue with SMTP line endings -- the particular remote sites which are having problems sending to you may be violating the spec by not sending \r\n, particularly at the end of the DATA phase. Use recordio with qmail-smtpd to record an example of the faulty session. If the resulting log doesn't mean anything to you, post it here. See djb's site and www.qmail.org for info on how to set up and use recordio. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Newbies Question [slightly offtopic]
John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Im trying to get tcpserver to work with my simple program written in C. [...] > It does the input first, and then all the output in one shot! > > Any ideas why that is happening or how to get it to work??? You posted this same question yesterday. Someone replied to your question, giving you the answer. You appear to have not read it. Go back and read the response you got -- look at the list archives if you have to. If you don't like the answer you received for some reason, tell us why -- don't just repost your question. That just annoys people, and gets you nowhere. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: How not to queue local deliveries
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:20:32PM +0530, Manvendra Bhangui wrote: > I have installed qmail 1.03. My problem is local deliveries are very slow. > Also on my mail servers most the mails are meant for local domains. > Is there any way that I can make qmail-queue directly dispatch the mail > to the user's maildir without queueing. No. qmail-queue doesn't have the needed privileges. Such a system would also have no good way of dealing with deferrals and partially-failed deliveries (multiple .qmail lines). Greetz, Peter.
microsoft RTFM?
finally! http://www.microsoft.com&[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp ~kurth
binm2
Dear All, I have installed qmail succefully on RH 7.0. it successfully rceievs messages and save it in ~user/Mbox. I wan to change it to /var/spool/mail. For this pupose I used binm2 file as rc. But still it does'nt work and don't send mail to /var/spool/mail as well as in Mbox. Now anybody can help me to configure it in a way that it can send mail to /var/spool/mail. Kashan Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Re: how can i change from inetd to xinetd in Redhat 7.0??
Hello,
* jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010223 05:09] wrote:
> I install with Redhat 7.0, but qmail FAQ only has something in inetd.conf, and
>Redhat 7.0 change the file to xinetd.conf, I don't know how to install with it.
>
> jerry
>
Example rules for xinetd.conf:
service smtp
{
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
user= qmaild
server = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env
server_args = /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
instances = 30
}
service pop-3
{
log_type= SYSLOG daemon
log_on_success = PID HOST EXIT DURATION
log_on_failure = HOST ATTEMPT RECORD
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
user= root
server = /usr/sbin/popa3d
instances = 30
}
service pop3s
{
log_type= SYSLOG daemon
log_on_success = PID HOST EXIT DURATION
log_on_failure = HOST ATTEMPT RECORD
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
user= stunnel
server = /usr/sbin/stunnel
server_args = -r 127.0.0.1:110
instances = 30
}
greets,
--
pawel garbowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How not to queue local deliveries
I have installed qmail 1.03. My problem is local deliveries are very slow. Also on my mail servers most the mails are meant for local domains. Is there any way that I can make qmail-queue directly dispatch the mail to the user's maildir without queueing. my .qmail-default contains the following line | /var/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox Any help on this will help me a lot Regards Manny
Re: qmail-scanner wrapper
On Thursday 22 February 2001 11:20, Brett Randall wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g > > Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl > > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# > > > > Trying the test script gives: > > > > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95/contrib# ./test_installation.sh -doit > > setting QMAILQUEUE to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl for this > > test... > > > > Sending eicar test virus - should be caught by perlscanner module... > > Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl > > qmail-inject: fatal: qq temporary problem (#4.3.0) > > done! > > What is this qq error? I can't use qmail-scanner and I REALLY need > to, but every message that I receive gets lost to this error. Any > body know why/how to fix? It might be that suidperl and qmail-scanner...pl are not suid (4755) or that you're not giving enough memory so qmail can start perl. Take a look at your softlimit. It must be about 4 times the value specified in LWQ []s Davi
Cannot receive mail from some sites
Hi, I am not shure if I posted this question correctly, I am repeting my self, sorry. I am using qmail1.03 with tcpserver. I can receive mail from almost all sites in the net ( for example yahoo.com), but there are few that cannot send mail to me ( for example the usa.net servers). They establish a connection but seize data transmition and qmail timeouts. Here is the session log: Log start Feb 22 23:49:53 gw smtpd: 982878593.400905 tcpserver: pid 2826 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.435991 tcpserver: ok 2826 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59228 Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.454757 2826 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.354098 2826 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.358529 2826 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.361590 2826 250- PIPELINING? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.364295 2826 250 8BITMIME? Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.783361 2826 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.787308 2826 250 ok? Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.563224 2826 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.568568 2826 250 ok? Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.139794 2826 DATA? Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.153254 2826 354 go ahead? Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.895510 2818 451 timeout (#4.4.2)? Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.898664 2818 [EOF] Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.909532 tcpserver: end 2818 status 256 Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.914715 tcpserver: status: 2/40 Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.075360 tcpserver: status: 3/40 Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.080109 tcpserver: pid 2831 from 193.158.192.31 Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.501498 tcpserver: ok 2831 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail- b.hypovereinsbank.de:193.158.192.31::55482 Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.519838 2831 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.885164 2831 EHLO vwmail-b.HypoVereinsbank.de? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.888215 2831 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.890929 2831 250- PIPELINING? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.893633 2831 250 8BITMIME? Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.679537 2831 MAIL From:? Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.683208 2831 250 ok? Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.914208 2831 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.917883 2831 250 ok? Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.464026 2831 DATA? Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.475434 2831 354 go ahead? Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.959661 tcpserver: status: 4/40 Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.964829 tcpserver: pid 2845 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 23 00:01:28 gw smtpd: 982879288.995972 tcpserver: ok 2845 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59740 Feb 23 00:01:29 gw smtpd: 982879289.015136 2845 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.037731 2845 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.040721 2845 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.043457 2845 250- PIPELINING? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.046194 2845 250 8BITMIME? Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.457610 2845 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.461524 2845 250 ok? Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.127466 2845 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.131349 2845 250 ok? Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.897281 2845 DATA? Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.909681 2845 354 go ahead? Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.847132 2823 451 timeout (#4.4.2)? Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.859363 2823 [EOF] Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.862978 tcpserver: end 2823 status 256 Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.865111 tcpserver: status: 3/40 Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.896561 tcpserver: status: 4/40 Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.900966 tcpserver: pid 2848 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.705930 tcpserver: ok 2848 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::60191 Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.725160 2848 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.562845 2848 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.566764 2848 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.569507 2848 250- PIPELINING? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.572209 2848 250 8BITMIME? Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.230800 2848 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
Paul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man >page. Including the sticky bit on the on the qmail-send directory? >Is this a supervise/multilog bug? No. >anyone getting qmail to log deliveries >to multilog using log/run ? Of course. >Any advise would be helpful. Provide more useful information than 'I set it up right and it doesn't work'. For example, the output of: cd [supervise directory] ls -lR cat */run */log/run -Dave
Newbies Question [slightly offtopic]
Hi,
Im trying to get tcpserver to work with my simple
program written in C. However, Im getting unexpected
results. My programm on execution is supposed to print
a welcome message to stdout, then read text from stdin
, then writes into stdout again. The source code looks
something like this.
...
printf("Welcome! Enter your name\n");
scanf("%s",name);
printf("Hello %s",name);
...
I use tcpserver to execute that program when there is
a connection to localhost on port 123 , like so
tcpserver 127.0.0.1 123 programname
however when i try telneting to 127.0.0.1 123
I dont get any "Welcome message" from my program.
upon telneting the programm is waiting for me to input
something... When I enter somthing , only then do I
get
the "Welcome..." then "Hello ".
--
bash-2.04$ telnet 127.0.0.1 555
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Bob
Welcome! Enter your name:
Hello Bob
--
It does the input first, and then all the output in
one shot!
Any ideas why that is happening or how to get it to
work???
Newbie.
___
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca
Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: > It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: > > info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0 > starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/ > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > end msg 224981 > new msg 224981 > info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0 > starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/ > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > end msg 224981 > > even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page. > Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries > to multilog using log/run ? Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory? Chris PGP signature
Re: LWQ & OpenBSD
I really should let this die, but I just can't... Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > >> Where does apachectl live? > >/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or >stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper >program for the sysadmin, not for the system. How do you start Apache if not "apachectl start"? >> How is having a simple control interface like: >[...] >> against "keep it simple"? >> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands? > >svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send >them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts. "Complex scripts"? You think think the LWQ qmail script is complex? Give me a break! It's freakin' trivial. Let's look at simplicity and complexity... Let's compare your way and my way for some simple qmail administration tasks: TaskBSD LWQ start PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin qmail start svscan /service & stopsvc -d /service/qmail-* qmail stop svc -d /service/qmail-*/log restart svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail restart svc -d /service/qmail-*/log PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin svscan /service & rebuild cdb tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \qmail cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp check queue qmail-qstat qmail queue qmail-qread hup fire up web browser qmail hup go to http://cr.yp.to find daemontools docs look up svc locate HUP option svc -h /service/qmail-send The last example is facetious, of course, but illustrative of the fact that not everyone wants to memorize all of svc's options. And when you need to act fast, do you really want to have to research what to do first? What if cr.yp.to's down? What if your net link is down? Do you really have a local copy of the daemontools docs? Is it current? >[Non-OS specific installation instructions] can't work. The OS >concepts are to different. That's pretty sad, but it's a symptom of the gratuitous incompatibilities that DJB rails against. And these are due to 20 different OS packagers each doing things their own way and demanding that developers accomodate their whims. The LWQ qmail script works the same on all platforms. Can't BSD be just a little flexible and allow cross-platform compatibility? -Dave
qmail-conf-054 / multilog
hello all using qmail-1.03 daemontools .70 and ucspi-88 on several RH 6.2 based servers. It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0 starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/ status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 end msg 224981 new msg 224981 info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0 starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/ status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 end msg 224981 even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page. Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries to multilog using log/run ? Any advise would be helpful. Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545
Cannot receive mail from several servers
Hi, I have qmail on RedHat5.1. I can receive mail from almost every server in Internet ( for example www.yahoo.com), but there are some servers I cant receive from. They make connection which timeouts. Here is the logged session: LOG start- Feb 22 23:49:53 gw smtpd: 982878593.400905 tcpserver: pid 2826 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.435991 tcpserver: ok 2826 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59228 Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.454757 2826 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.354098 2826 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.358529 2826 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.361590 2826 250- PIPELINING? Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.364295 2826 250 8BITMIME? Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.783361 2826 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.787308 2826 250 ok? Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.563224 2826 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.568568 2826 250 ok? Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.139794 2826 DATA? Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.153254 2826 354 go ahead? Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.895510 2818 451 timeout (#4.4.2)? Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.898664 2818 [EOF] Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.909532 tcpserver: end 2818 status 256 Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.914715 tcpserver: status: 2/40 Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.075360 tcpserver: status: 3/40 Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.080109 tcpserver: pid 2831 from 193.158.192.31 Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.501498 tcpserver: ok 2831 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail- b.hypovereinsbank.de:193.158.192.31::55482 Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.519838 2831 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.885164 2831 EHLO vwmail-b.HypoVereinsbank.de? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.888215 2831 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.890929 2831 250- PIPELINING? Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.893633 2831 250 8BITMIME? Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.679537 2831 MAIL From:? Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.683208 2831 250 ok? Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.914208 2831 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.917883 2831 250 ok? Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.464026 2831 DATA? Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.475434 2831 354 go ahead? Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.959661 tcpserver: status: 4/40 Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.964829 tcpserver: pid 2845 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 23 00:01:28 gw smtpd: 982879288.995972 tcpserver: ok 2845 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59740 Feb 23 00:01:29 gw smtpd: 982879289.015136 2845 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.037731 2845 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.040721 2845 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.043457 2845 250- PIPELINING? Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.046194 2845 250 8BITMIME? Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.457610 2845 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.461524 2845 250 ok? Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.127466 2845 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.131349 2845 250 ok? Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.897281 2845 DATA? Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.909681 2845 354 go ahead? Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.847132 2823 451 timeout (#4.4.2)? Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.859363 2823 [EOF] Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.862978 tcpserver: end 2823 status 256 Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.865111 tcpserver: status: 3/40 Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.896561 tcpserver: status: 4/40 Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.900966 tcpserver: pid 2848 from 194.221.211.145 Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.705930 tcpserver: ok 2848 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::60191 Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.725160 2848 220 ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.562845 2848 EHLO vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.566764 2848 250- ms.eurorisksystems.com? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.569507 2848 250- PIPELINING? Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.572209 2848 250 8BITMIME? Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.230800 2848 MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.233885 2848 250 ok? Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 982879740.906551 2848 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 9828797
Re: LWQ & OpenBSD
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > >> > >> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V > >> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and > >> generally useful on all UNIX flavors as a qmail control > >> interface. Maybe I should rename it qmailctl a la apachectl or > >> ctlqmail a la ctlinnd... > > > >No. I'd go with Robin to say that init scripts shouldn't live in > >/usr/local/whatever, > > Where should they live? Nowhere. We have exactly two (2) init scripts, /etc/rc and /etc/rc.local > Where does apachectl live? /usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper program for the sysadmin, not for the system. > >and your qmail script, perfect for linux and other > >sysv-init systems, is not adequate for *BSD. > Does "qmail start" not work on *BSD? Of course it does. It may be more > than you want, but that doesn't make it inadequate. maybe inadequate wasn't the right word, bit it doesn't fit in BSd philosophy. > >It's totally against the "keep it simple"-approach. > > How is having a simple control interface like: [...] > against "keep it simple"? > What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands? svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts. svscan/supervise fits good in BSD world as these are simple approaches working very very fine. > >> Granted, I should add a note about adding: > >> if [ -x /usr/local/sbin/qmail ]; then > >> /usr/local/sbin/qmail start > >> fi > >> to rc.local for BSD variants, > > > >No, see above. > > I just don't get it. > > >... I believe that you don't have a linux > >bias, and in fact i'd guess most qmail-installations _are_ on linux. I'd > >just separate basic instructions from os specifica as we have done it in > >http://www.lifewithdjbdns.org/ and http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/. > > My goal with LWQ--and it was obviously less than 100% successful--was > to keep the installation instructions as portable as possible. I > wanted to avoid having constant interruptions for OS-specific > details. It can't work. The OS concepts are to different. > -Dave > -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Re: Mysterious error message
Tim Hassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed > [some.ip.add.ress] Doesn't look like a qmail error message to me either. > Now, I telnet to the qmail box (from the server that runs his code that > connects to the qmail box to send emails) on port 25 and helo my.host.com, > mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> data, body, and > "." and qmail queues the message with no errors, I get the email at the > other end. Hrmm But were you trying to send the message to the same address(es) his web stuff is using? Is it possible that this bounce is actually coming froma machine one hop past your qmail box? Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. > >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either > >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Yes! It's really our DNS problem. [...] > But I have not fix the queue yet, because I don't know how to Shut down the > qmail-send. I have seen many documents,some use "svc" command, there isn't > "svc" command in our server, also I cann't find qmail-send.pid file in > /var/run like some articles said. How could I do? I take it that you are not the one that installed qmail on this system. There's a thousand ways to start/stop qmail. You don't have a svc command, so it's probably not running under svscan. If it's installed with a SysV-like startup script, try /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail stop or /etc/init.d/qmail stop or possibly (some Lwq installs): /usr/local/bin/qmail stop If none of those work, see if you have /var/qmail/bin/rc -- that tells you how qmail starts, and perhaps then you'll know how to stop it. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Return address for autoresponder
Hello I am writing an auto-responder in Perl. I have been looking for the ones publicly available, but I was wondering to what address I have to respond to, namely: Do you need to look for Reply-To: first and if that header is unavailable look for From:? Or has qmail a mechanism for itself to determine it (I think their is nothing useful in $ENV[]. Regards Leander
Re: CNAME problem with qmail and djbdns
Marcus Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have setup a qmail server with the patched dns.c file (PACKETSZ increased >to 65536). You shouldn't do that if you're using dnscache. >Also a local dnscache based on djbdns-1.05 is setup according to the FAQs. >Normal lookups are working fine, but qmail together with dnscache running >connecting to the localhost as server (127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf) I got the >following messages in the qmail/current log for any mail message. > >2001-02-22 17:19:07.687368500 status: local 0/10 remote 2/20 >2001-02-22 17:19:07.690907500 delivery 3: deferral: >CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ For what domain? Were you able to look up that domain via dnscache on the same system at the same time? -Dave
Re: qmail-smtpd logging
"Chris Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > have it logged for remote-to-local x-fers, for say finding out the address > of an open spam relay that keeps sending me junk, that is my end-goal. qmail's approach is that you look in the message that you have. As someone else has pointed out - it's in the Received: headers... > Perhaps I'm going about this the wrong way, but in the past with sendmail I > have always been able to get this information from my logs. ...which is great, except when you don't have the message because you're trying to analyse it passing through your system. Markus Stumpf has been working on some improved qmail-smtpd logging. James.
Re: LWQ & OpenBSD
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> man hier should be a lot older than OpenBSD or whatever. I mean, really.
Unix-88 said that this sort of non-vendor provided stuff should go in
/opt/{vendor}/, but SunOS 4.1.x chose not to do that and few others do
even now. (SunOS 4's HIER(7) suggested /usr/local/ was for "locally
maintained software", and /var/ was "directory of files that tend to
grow or vary in size". The BSD4.4-derived OS's go further and suggest
that /var/ should be solely transient stuff)
Nowadays, I'm tending to build things self contained in
/opt/{product}/ and symlink appropriate things into /usr/local/*/.
For qmail on Solaris, I've been going for:
/opt/qmail/
alias/
bin/
boot/
control/
doc/
log -> var/log/qmail
man/
queue -> var/queue
sbin/
supervise/
users/
var -> /var/qmail
/var/qmail/queue/
/var/log/qmail/
/usr/local/man/*/* -> /opt/qmail/man/*/* (to aid use of man)
(as I consider my qmail configurations and binaries non-transient!)
supervise/ is a tricky one though - some bits in there are
configuration and some bits are transient status info. How would
supervise cope if the .../{process}/supervise/ subdirectories were
symlinks into /var/run/supervise/ ?
(control/ should arguably be in /etc/opt/qmail/..., as should alias/.)
Dan's right that it's a mess, for sure.
James.
Re: djbcron
"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A few years ago i had a gig teaching use of Tivoli Maestro, which is best > described to Unixheads as "cron on steroids". It's a port of a mainframe Yes! Many of us will have encountered this functionality in similar tools such as Autosys and Control-M - and it is functionality that would be worth having. > The neatest feature it has, however, is a very sophisticated dependency > relationship, so you can say things like: > > Run job A on work days > Run job B on holidays and weekends > Run job C after either job A or job B has completed. (but don't run job C if > A or B did not run). plus: - including the ability to restart at any job once a problem has been fixed. - conditional execution depending upon the result of a previous job. - maximum number of simulataneous jobs on a system, or across systems. (and the ability to have user interfaces sat atop, to indicate how far a batch-run has got.) James.
qmail Digest 23 Feb 2001 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1284
qmail Digest 23 Feb 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1284 Topics (messages 57766 through 57824): about qmailadmin 57766 by: Someone about quota for qmail 57767 by: Someone Re: LWQ & OpenBSD 57768 by: Henning Brauer 57773 by: Dave Sill 57774 by: Henning Brauer 57780 by: Robin S. Socha 57781 by: Dave Sill 57784 by: Dave Sill 57788 by: Robin S. Socha 57789 by: Henning Brauer 57803 by: Dave Sill 57806 by: Dave Sill Patching error with qmail-smtpd 57769 by: John P 57778 by: Charles Cazabon SMTP-AUTH problems 57770 by: John P 57790 by: Kris Kelley 57792 by: John P 57794 by: Kris Kelley 57808 by: listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski Re: qmail-scanner wrapper 57771 by: Brett Randall 57772 by: John P 57796 by: Jason Haar Re: Slow connection on send & Server connection closed 57775 by: Dave Sill Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r 57776 by: Charles Cazabon 57819 by: flint 57820 by: flint Re: mail queue problem. 5 by: Charles Cazabon 57816 by: Manvendra Bhangui long delay in receiving from HOTMAIL, routing problem? 57779 by: Chrisanthy Chrisanthy 57782 by: Jonathan D. Poole qmail-qfilter ~ Help... 57783 by: jsunday.parview.com Where to ask ezmlm-idx questions? 57785 by: nolan.celery.tssi.com 57787 by: Jonathan D. Poole Re: qmail test scripts 57786 by: Dave Sill autorespond 57791 by: Mark Lane yay 57793 by: Carl qmail-pop3d: tcpserver: unable to bind: address in use problem 57795 by: schoon.amgt.com 57798 by: Charles Cazabon 57799 by: schoon.amgt.com 57801 by: Greg White Qmail-Scanner for each user 57797 by: Alan R. thinko 57800 by: Charles Cazabon newbie question on forwarding email 57802 by: Virginia Chism 57804 by: Charles Cazabon forward and keep mail 57805 by: Javier Morquecho Morquecho 57807 by: Charles Cazabon Newbies tcpserver question [slightly offtopic] 57809 by: John Peterson 57810 by: Kris Kelley unsubsribe 57811 by: wheatly LWQ & qmail-smtp-auth 57812 by: dennis how can i change from inetd to xinetd in Redhat 7.0?? 57813 by: jerry 57814 by: Peter Cavender pam-checkpassword .diff ? 57815 by: dennis qmailadmin compile question 57817 by: sberg.white.pangaealink.com CNAME problem with qmail and djbdns 57818 by: Marcus Korte Mysterious error message 57821 by: Tim Hassan Virtual Domain Quota 57822 by: Eko Yulianto 57823 by: Frank Tegtmeyer About qmail & sendmail. 57824 by: Someone Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hi all If i use qmailadmin but not use vpopmail. Can i do it ? How? Thank you someone Hi, all If i not use vpopmail. Can i set quota for user in /etc/passwd ? How ? Thank you someone On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote: > Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is > started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ? The lack of the complicated sysv-style init and its dependencies is a big advantage for OpenBSD ;-)) Just enter PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin svscan /service & in your /etc/rc.local Greetings Henning -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just enter > >PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin >svscan /service & > >in your /etc/rc.local Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan /var/qmail/supervise &". But putting: /usr/local/sbin/qmail start in rc.local is the correct approach. -Dave On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Just enter > > > >PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin > >svscan /service & > > > >in your /etc/rc.local > > Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan > /var/qmail/supervise &". But putting: > > /usr/local/sbin/qmail start > > in rc.local is the correct approach. Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD concept, especially the OpenBSD concept. Just (soft-)link you stuff from /var/qmail/supervise to /service and use the lines as I typed them. For my taste lwq is a bit too linux-specific. Don't tell people to use sysv-sytle init
About qmail & sendmail.
Hi all, I want infomations about qmail compares with sendmail. Can you help me? Where www talk about them? Such as efficiency, speedy, security, why?, ...etc. Thank you someone...
Re: Virtual Domain Quota
> But, How to make user quota in virtual domain, because I try to use > vsetuserquota in Vpopmail and cannot blok the user space. Please ask such questions at the vpopmail mailinglist. Regards, Frank
Virtual Domain Quota
Hello, I 've installed Qmail 1.03 on FreeBSD 4.2. I install Vpopmail for virtual domain. But, How to make user quota in virtual domain, because I try to use vsetuserquota in Vpopmail and cannot blok the user space. Can any one explain to me Thanks Regards, eko _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Mysterious error message
Hello, This might be a little off topic but it is pretty much about qmail. I have a very mysterious problem. I had setup a qmail server (and a local dnscache running on 127.0.0.1 for faster nslookups) for a customer of mine, and it has been working absolutely fine. He also had some weird crappy ms asp code, vbscript, and something to do with MS SQL and odbc connections. This code basically stores e-mail addresses on the MS SQL server, divided in tables by categories, and at a later time, you could use the asp web interface to send emails to email addresses listed under certain categories. He had it working against his sendmail or Imail box or something. His code just uses the basic RFC compliant commands like HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, data, etc. He liked the performance and reliability and thus wanted to do more migration. Now he changed his "asp code" or "stuff" (I am not exactly sure what exactly) to relay the mail through this qmail server and not through the sendmail/Imail box as it used to. All the emails to be sent are sent to remote addresses and not local of course. I also made sure I allow relaying for that entire Class C Subnet like 1.2.3.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" in /etc/tcp.smtp and compiled it with tcprules to tcp.smtp which the mentioned in the tcpserver -x command to start qmail. Now he tests his code, and he keeps getting the following error (on his nt box that is sending the emails to the qmail server to actually deliver them): 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed [some.ip.add.ress] At a first glance, I could swear on anything that this looks nothing to me like a qmail error. 1. I am not running tcpserver with -p and -P 2. The error message is not in a recognized message format like for example the unimplemented qmail error message: 502 unimplemented (#5.5.1) First, the error code is mentioned *always* last! Second, the error code is *always* prefixed with a hash mark "#" Third, the error code is enclosed in paranthesis Now, I telnet to the qmail box (from the server that runs his code that connects to the qmail box to send emails) on port 25 and helo my.host.com, mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> data, body, and "." and qmail queues the message with no errors, I get the email at the other end. Hrmm Does this error message look familiar? I also connected to that qmail box from an ip that doesn't resolve and relayed mail through it fine (after putting the ip address in tcp.smtp and compiling it's .cdb) So I really believe that is not a qmail error! What is it then? I'd really appreciate any ideas (Please cc me a copy of your reply) Best Regards, Tamer Hassan
Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r
Dear Charles Cazabon >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Charles Yes! It's really our DNS problem. Several days ago,we have changed DNS server. Today i check the DNS server carefully, I found it can resolve the names in our domain,but it doen't use it's own data,it always say:"Non-authoritative answer: ..". I have configure the Named again. It's ok now. But I have not fix the queue yet, because I don't know how to Shut down the qmail-send. I know it is really a very stupid question. I have seen many documents,some use "svc" command, there isn't "svc" command in our server, also I cann't find qmail-send.pid file in /var/run like some articles said. How could I do? I'm appreaciate for your warmheartedness and patience. flint
Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r
Dear Charles Cazabon >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Charles Yes! It's really our DNS problem. Several days ago,we have changed DNS server. Today i check the DNS server carefully, I found it can resolve the names in our domain,but it doen't use it's own data,it always say:"Non-authoritative answer: ..". I have configure the Named again. It's ok now. But I have not fix the queue yet, because I don't know how to Shut down the qmail-send. I know it is really a very stupid question. I have seen many documents,some use "svc" command, there isn't "svc" command in our server, also I cann't find qmail-send.pid file in /var/run like some articles said. How could I do? I'm appreaciate for your warmheartedness and patience. flint
CNAME problem with qmail and djbdns
Hi, I have setup a qmail server with the patched dns.c file (PACKETSZ increased to 65536). Also a local dnscache based on djbdns-1.05 is setup according to the FAQs. Normal lookups are working fine, but qmail together with dnscache running connecting to the localhost as server (127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf) I got the following messages in the qmail/current log for any mail message. 2001-02-22 17:19:07.687368500 status: local 0/10 remote 2/20 2001-02-22 17:19:07.690907500 delivery 3: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ 2001-02-22 17:19:07.690914500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 2001-02-22 17:19:07.690996500 delivery 4: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ 2001-02-22 17:19:07.691000500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 With the resolv.conf containing our nameservers there are no problems. Has anybody experienced a similar problem? Is my dnscache setup wrong? Any ideas? Regards, Marcus -- Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
