Re: [biofuel] FW: [Distillers] Continuous still ?

2001-05-29 Thread terry calmes

Sir, have you worked any more on you thoughts of a continuous still? If so I 
would love to know where you are at on the idea and if it would work on a 
small scale. Thank you ... terry calmes


From: Ackland, Tony (CALNZAS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
To: 'biofuel@yahoogroups.com' biofuel@yahoogroups.com
CC: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [biofuel] FW: [Distillers] Continuous still ?
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:21:30 -


-Original Message-
From: Ackland, Tony (CALNZAS)
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Distillers] Continuous still ?


First point to note ...I've mixed up my terms ... the new section below the
feed point is actually a stripping section; the standard column above 
this
is the rectifying section (not the other way round!) - thanks Mike

Tim,

I'd considered some sort of bleed-off for the other fractions, but the
sticking point was knowing what sort of flowrate you'd get of each of them.
e.g. off a 20L wash, I'd be surprised if there were more than a few mL of
the tails present (in concentrated form). So, even if they were being
carried in a mostly ethanol stream at the different heights, you'd still
only want to limit their collection to a VERY slow drip.  But I couldn't 
see
how to do this accurately.  Then I got to thinking, that if the total 
volume
of wash was still say less than 100-200L (plenty for personal consumption
!), then there would still only be a small total amount of tails, and it
might be likely that they could either be fully retained within the column
(at their own level), or likely to find their way out with the continuously
discarded bottoms.  I'm figuring that even as a continuous still, it is
limited to batch running, and doesn't have quite the same concerns as
something designed to run continuously for months at a time ?  Its hard to
know, given we don't know the relevant concentrations of them in the
incoming wash.  But what you suggest is an easy enough modification to 
make,
should my guessing be wrong.

Ted,

Good thinking... my plan was to try and keep it as simple as possible,
without using anything fancy (not even a pump) or extra - see if I could do
it as a simple add-on to a normal column...but you got me thinking more
about trying to use the condenser, rather than the boiler.

I originally had problems with seeing how to pass the wash through the
condenser coil (as my present one has quite a large pressure drop - 
doubtful
that a simple gravity feed system would push through it).  But - how about 
a
cold finger design ?  It doesn't have to be perfect - just as long as the
feed does a fair chunk of its heating up there, it is freeing up the boiler
to make the vapour.  And keep the water cooled coil above it, for backup in
times of low wash feedrate.  The coldfinger could be a large diameter, with
little pressure drop.  The way I have my condenser at present, this could
easily be added as a separate unit between the condenser and the metering
valve - no modifications required.  The only downside of not perfectly
heating (or superheating) the feed is that it will use a bit more of the
column to heat up - so get a small dead zone not doing much below the feed
point, other than transferring heat - no dramas - just make the stripping
section a little bit longer.

I've included a second diagram - not to scale, but to show the layout

By taking the coil out of the boiler, the boiler could be made even 
smaller.
The new problem that this introduces is that the wash barrel now has to be
higher than the top of everything - probably a couple of meters up.  Need
someway of getting it on top of a ladder, or using a header tank (and pump,
damm !)

I'll do the maths this evening and see how using the condenser for some
preheating changes the flowrates etc.

thanks for the input.

Tony







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread dabbs

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 the only thing going on is the begining of a scam. these numbers 
look like
 an outright fabrication.
 
 Steve Spence
 Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
 http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm
 
 Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
 Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
 X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
 We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
 we borrow it from our children.

Scuze me folks, like I said, EPA is not God.
Spence IS!!!
};^)


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread ellisd

In some of the test that claim they got better milage and such, some 
investigations found out that the people tuned the engine up after 
the put the magnets on then ran the 2nd part of the test.. 
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It's amazing that the people still buy into the magnet stuff. The 
 EPA 
  has test all the magic magnet devices and even some of 
  those magicals metal ionizing pipes (just an aluminum pipe and 
  other means of boosting you ecomony. The EPA only found one 
device 
  based on magnets that show any difference, but it was small boost 
  like maybe 1%, which I think was a fluke. Remember, if the 
company 
  say it's EPA certified, it's BS.  
  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], beeteljeuse beelzebub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 EPA tests are the biggest jokes known in history. I was 
involuntarily 
 detained once via highway patrol by an EPA test. They were checking 
 emissions on early and late model vehicles. When they got to mine, 
 they checked it once, scratched their heads and did it again. 
 They ran the test a third time and asked me to pop open my hood. 
They 
 feverishly checked everything under the sun to find out what I had 
 altered to get such low readings, but could not find anything out 
of 
 the ordinary. It was a stone-cold stock '68 Plymouth Valient that 
 with absolutely no emissions controls, that was getting extremely 
 lower emissions than that of brand new cars that were being checked.
 There are many things on the EPA lists of things that do not work 
 that we have found benifits.
 You say that they have tested all the magic magnet devices. 
 I say impossible. There are some that a select few people even 
know 
 about that are in the trial stages now. How does EPA test those??
 EPA is not God. Trust them like you would the oil and gas crooks.
 
 The man that did the magnet test on the gen set paid over $10,000 
on 
 a professional gas analyser to test emissions and air/fuel ratios.
 
 Here is a quote from my previous post that no one seemed to comment 
 about.
 
 The AFR was adjusted and a further 
   test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The 
AFR 
  was 
   meassured as being 21.5/1. 
   When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running, 
 the  HC 
   reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is 
 
 going 
   on for there sure.
 
 As for the air/fuel ratio, it was obtained by his own invention. A 
 vaporizing carburetor that he plans to market in the near future. 
 Also note the HC readings measured in parts per million goes down 
 after removing the magnets. It does not take a rocket scientist or 
an 
 EPA goon to notice that, like the man said, Something is going on 
 for sure.
 Driving conditions did not come into play with this test and the 
 generator was under the same load in all the testing.
 
 Have Fun,
 Sam


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread steve spence

extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence. notice how they get
all upset when you ask them to prove it. especially when it's not evidence
that they themselves have seen, but are parroting from someone else.

so and so told me, or I saw a video doesn't cut it. show me peer
reviewed science that proves the claims, explains the science, or shut up
about this crap.

It's heartening to see that some folks can still think logically, and not
get caught up in the religious fervor.


Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children.
--

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:42 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


 In some of the test that claim they got better milage and such, some
 investigations found out that the people tuned the engine up after
 the put the magnets on then ran the 2nd part of the test..
 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It's amazing that the people still buy into the magnet stuff. The
  EPA
   has test all the magic magnet devices and even some of
   those magicals metal ionizing pipes (just an aluminum pipe and
   other means of boosting you ecomony. The EPA only found one
 device
   based on magnets that show any difference, but it was small boost
   like maybe 1%, which I think was a fluke. Remember, if the
 company
   say it's EPA certified, it's BS.
   --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], beeteljeuse beelzebub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 
  EPA tests are the biggest jokes known in history. I was
 involuntarily
  detained once via highway patrol by an EPA test. They were checking
  emissions on early and late model vehicles. When they got to mine,
  they checked it once, scratched their heads and did it again.
  They ran the test a third time and asked me to pop open my hood.
 They
  feverishly checked everything under the sun to find out what I had
  altered to get such low readings, but could not find anything out
 of
  the ordinary. It was a stone-cold stock '68 Plymouth Valient that
  with absolutely no emissions controls, that was getting extremely
  lower emissions than that of brand new cars that were being checked.
  There are many things on the EPA lists of things that do not work
  that we have found benifits.
  You say that they have tested all the magic magnet devices.
  I say impossible. There are some that a select few people even
 know
  about that are in the trial stages now. How does EPA test those??
  EPA is not God. Trust them like you would the oil and gas crooks.
 
  The man that did the magnet test on the gen set paid over $10,000
 on
  a professional gas analyser to test emissions and air/fuel ratios.
 
  Here is a quote from my previous post that no one seemed to comment
  about.
 
  The AFR was adjusted and a further
test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The
 AFR
   was
meassured as being 21.5/1.
When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running,
  the  HC
reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is
 
  going
on for there sure.
 
  As for the air/fuel ratio, it was obtained by his own invention. A
  vaporizing carburetor that he plans to market in the near future.
  Also note the HC readings measured in parts per million goes down
  after removing the magnets. It does not take a rocket scientist or
 an
  EPA goon to notice that, like the man said, Something is going on
  for sure.
  Driving conditions did not come into play with this test and the
  generator was under the same load in all the testing.
 
  Have Fun,
  Sam


 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] costs of ingredeints to produce biodiesel from rapeseed oil

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

No - other way round
Caustic soda - lye - is 99.5% dehydrated and cheap
KOH is usually 85% and not so cheap 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

Can't do much more than put it on my site

Try www.biofuels.fsnet.co.uk/din51606.htm 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] I want to brew my first batch of biodiesel

2001-05-29 Thread eric almanzan


I want to brew some biodiesel, im not a chemist, but i
have read mike pelleys recipe several times, and i
understand most of it.  Im going to have to start by
buying the pieces like the big pot to heat it in, i
can make a jig for the stirring pretty easily, but
after that i get kind of confused.  Is the pot i cook
it in supposed to have a spout at the bottom to drain
out the biodiesel?? and after its seperated from
cooking and then drained I will have to wash it, will
i need another special pot for that??  I will ask my
questions piece by piece so i can understand them
better.   where do i get methanol and lye??

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

Sorry - link not working
Must learn how to drive this thing!
Try www.biodiesel.de and look for the biodiesel2000 section - I think I
found it there


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] REMOME NAME PLEASE

2001-05-29 Thread jmcdan3373

 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] More on Jerusalem artichokes

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Hi Harry

Thanks for those references Keith, they will be very useful.

You're most welcome, I'm glad you can use them.

produce enough food to go around. Until I observe a change in the way
wealth, and food, are distributed I must insist that we do all we can to
increase the total production of food and services to humans. When so many

Well, you see, the last time this came up, quite recently (it comes 
up every so often), I caused a furore by saying that hungry people 
don't starve because of a shortage of food but because of an 
inequitable economic system. It's all in the message archives, quite 
interesting. So this time I thought I'd refrain. :-)

Of course I agree with you, but I think increasing production has got 
a bad record. Too often it's tended to increase the rich-poor gap, 
exclude the poor even further, and cause yet more environmental 
degradation. The Green Revolution is a classic case, though far from 
the only one. It helped all the wrong people.

It might make more sense instead to remove some of the constraints on 
production at the small farms level. These programs always purport to 
be helping small farmers, yet they invariably have a minimum size 
cut-off point, confining the assistance to big farmers. 
Trickle-down will do the rest, we're told. Removing such 
constraints often means confronting the inequities which hold these 
people down and which are the real cause of their parlous situation, 
not any lack of productive capability. There are plenty of success 
stories along these lines, but you don't hear of them much.

I am in an unstable phase in regards to my position on Ecological
Sustainability and population.

That sounds healthy! It's no place for comfortable certitudes.

If we are in fact in denial and
consequentially get it wrong we and the rest of biodiversity may only
survive in pockets, despite what WE do the poor may destroy the biosphere in
THEIR attempt to survive. Even the references you gave in regards to food
production (and they are amongst the best) leave an after taste of closure,
of hope rather than reason.

I think they're quite positive, really. They're activists and 
campaigners, quite effective. They don't see it as hopeless. Nor do 
I.

The food import figures you quote may indicate
the capacity of the populations concerned to pay for imports including food
and I'm sure that you are aware of this aspect, indeed that is my real
concern. If we were right why did we go to such convolutions to justify our
position.

Various prime growing areas in Third World countries, together 
totalling an area five times the size of Holland, are devoted to 
growing cattle feed for Dutch cattle, at preferential rates. They 
should be growing food for their own people, or at least commodities 
they got a fair price for or could add their own value to. The Dutch 
turn it into various surpluses - beef mountains, dairy lakes. And use 
a lot of their own land to grow tulips, which they get a good price 
for. And of course their farmers are subsidized. I'm not picking on 
the Dutch. It's not an isolated case, just the one that springs to 
mind.

Doesn't have much to do with feeding people, does it?

Market forces inevitably move money, commodities, goods, resources, 
towards those with surplus resources, away from those with inadequate 
resources. The winds of free trade favour the ships with the big 
sails. A truly free market would require a lot of regulation and 
intervention, rather than less and less, the recipe currently 
promoted with increasing success by the free marketeers (read 
corporate interests). We are rewarded for our silence and inaction 
via enhanced opportunities for conspicuous consumption. Growing 
numbers are rejecting this with increasing vehemence.

One could argue that the world never was sustainable simply because
starvation related disease always existed. As it stands the fat or greedy
fail to leave enough to feed the poor and that means that the world does NOT
produce enough food to go around.

It does, but for the fat and greedy. So which is the better solution, 
to produce more food or rein in the fat and greedy? Greed knows no 
limits, is never satisfied.

There have been many traditional societies and traditional systems 
which proved sustainable, some still are.

Until I observe a change in the way
wealth, and food, are distributed I must insist that we do all we can to
increase the total production of food and services to humans. When so many
depend on the scraps from a rich man's table the apparent solution is more
food for the rich resulting in more scraps for the poor.

But it doesn't work that way. The position of the poor doesn't 
improve via some sort of upward suction effect, it gets worse. The 
gap widens.

We are attempting
to reduce our waste and effective consumption by recycling, while we are at
it we reduce our environmental impact. These are good things. We should,
though, take care that cleaner production at the farm level 

RE: [biofuel] Re: Reclaiming the methanol

2001-05-29 Thread kirk

$2 a pound for KOH? How much does KCl cost?

-Original Message-
From: Gary and Jos Kimlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 5:26 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Reclaiming the methanol


Paul my next batch will be with cotton seed oil. I intend to use the
twostage with KOH rather than NaOH. The best I can do with NaOH seems to be
80-85% pure, I suspect that leaves too much water to avoid soaps. I'll take
your advice and wash and dry it. I'll let you know how it goes. The oil
collectors here buy the oil and sell to a soap factory. I'll need more
experience to determine the break even point on oil cost, so far KOH is
$100/25kg and Methanol $30/20l drum. I need to calculate the average energy
cost. Any experience using glycerin as a heating fuel?


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.252 / Virus Database: 125 - Release Date: 5/9/2001

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.252 / Virus Database: 125 - Release Date: 5/9/2001


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Jan Sur—wka

Hi James,

I was asking this morning if there is any English counterpart of this German 
standard.
I got the answer from biofuel that there exist ASTM PS121-99 provisional USX 
standard

but

you can look at www.astm.org andfind out that you can buy it for 30 bucks 
(30 US $).

I suppose that the same will be with this DIN 51606 standard  - you will have 
to pay for it probably.

I do not know the German web site where to find it.

jan surowka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





RE: [biofuel] Re: Reclaiming the methanol

2001-05-29 Thread jerry dycus


Hi All,
For those who are reclaiming methanol what %
of the methanol do you get back? I assume vacuum
recovery method.
 Thanks, 
  jerry dycus 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: What about making engine oil?

2001-05-29 Thread Alan S. Petrillo

Jeremy Shuey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hmmm   So am I.  Along with being a paramedic.  Sounds
 scary all of a sudden.  ;-)  
[snip]

Before you laugh too hard at the idea you'll find someone's already
doing it.  
 
http://www.agromgt.com/
http://www.greatplainsoil.com/amg2000.htm
http://www.kiowacountycolo.com/sf-oil.htm
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1999/v4-247.html

What they're finding is properly formulated vegetable based motor oils
are superior to petroleum based motor oils.  The Purdue report makes
very interesting reading.  

Agro Management's AMG-2000 product is interesting.  They've gotten the
United States Post Office in Grand Rapids, Michigan to use it in some of
their delivery vehicles with interesting results.  Their web site design
is lousy, and they don't have any good links to the results, but if you
use their search function and enter michigan you'll get a list of
links.  

Happy reading!  

-- 
Aviation is more than a hobby.  It is more than a job.  It is more than
a career.  Aviation is a way of life.  
A second language for the world:  www.esperanto.org
Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste.  www.distributed.net

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread jerry dycus

 Hi Steve and All,
--- steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 extraordinary claims, require extraordinary
 evidence. notice how they get
 all upset when you ask them to prove it. especially
 when it's not evidence
 that they themselves have seen, but are parroting
 from someone else.
Notice that they haven't tried the idle method to
check if there is a difference. It's easy, cheap and
reliable. 
 Come on guy's take your magnets off and see if
the rpm falls. If it truely works the rpm will fall
100 rpm and rise when put back on.
 Maybe they did but don't want to admit it.
jerry dycus


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: What about making engine oil?

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Alan S. Petrillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Jeremy Shuey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hmmm   So am I.  Along with being a paramedic.  Sounds
  scary all of a sudden.  ;-)
[snip]

Before you laugh too hard at the idea you'll find someone's already
doing it.

Yep. Now we have biofuel, bio-oil, maybe we'll get to the bottom of 
the anti-freeze question, so what about brake-fluid? Is silicon fluid 
bio? I suppose not. After that all we'll have to worry about is all 
the fossil fuel used in manufacturing the vehicles. Surely but a 
simple nut to crack. :-)

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 

http://www.agromgt.com/
http://www.greatplainsoil.com/amg2000.htm
http://www.kiowacountycolo.com/sf-oil.htm
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1999/v4-247.html

What they're finding is properly formulated vegetable based motor oils
are superior to petroleum based motor oils.  The Purdue report makes
very interesting reading.

Agro Management's AMG-2000 product is interesting.  They've gotten the
United States Post Office in Grand Rapids, Michigan to use it in some of
their delivery vehicles with interesting results.  Their web site design
is lousy, and they don't have any good links to the results, but if you
use their search function and enter michigan you'll get a list of
links.

Happy reading!


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread milliontc

I wonder if anyone knows of a web address where I can view the German 
biodiesel standard DIN 51606. (German language is fine)
James

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

There is no British standard as yet - CEN standard is due next year and
should be in force by the end of 2003.
UK will probably adopt DIN51606 as interim measure


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] German biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

OK, it works now - had to strip it out a bit
German, Austrian and US specs no on
www.biofuels.fsnet.co.uk/din51606.htm 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] What about making engine oil?

2001-05-29 Thread David Reid

You want the webpage as well? I see 4 high school students here got
suspended for making a bomb that demolished an outdoor toilet block from a
recipe and how to page they found on the web. The Timothy McVeighs of this
world dont die so easy eh?
B.r.,  David

- Original Message -
From: steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] What about making engine oil?


 firemen, making alternative fuels. hmmm

 you guys like things that go bang as well? ;-)

 Steve Spence



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] more on Jerusalem artichokes

2001-05-29 Thread David Reid

Marc,
 Contacted the curator and heard back the next day. Then asked for
info and trial seed mentioning that it was for the Phillipines but have not
heard back yet. Perhaps info is in transit. Have just sent them another
e-mail this morning to find out where things are at.
B.r.,  David

- Original Message -
From: F. Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel List biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:04 PM
Subject: [biofuel] more on Jerusalem artichokes


 Subject: Re: More on Jerusalem artichokes
 Steve Spence wrote:

 my father in law just plowed under 2 acres of Jerusalem artichokes.
 they
 keep coming up and he can't get rid of them :-(

 The books do say that volunteer plants are a problem with all the
 sunflower family.

 Wish he could send the tubers over here - I can't find any starter
 stock!

 Marc de Piolenc
 Iligan, Philippines



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread David Reid

Sam,
How could you have got it so wrong. He is not I am. When you give me
reasonable proof I will support you and install one myself. Until then I
remain sceptical and aloof.
B.r.,  David

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:25 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  the only thing going on is the begining of a scam. these numbers
 look like
  an outright fabrication.
 
  Steve Spence
  Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
  http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm
 
  Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
  Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
  X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
  We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
  we borrow it from our children.

 Scuze me folks, like I said, EPA is not God.
 Spence IS!!!
 };^)



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] CMS Paragon mini turbine

2001-05-29 Thread David Reid

Hi David C and others who are interested,
Just received the 
following reply re Paragon mini turbine.
B.r.,  David


Mr Reid:

As EPI is currently testing our first unit at a land fill site in New
Jersey, firm technical data and costs will not be available until such time
as testing is complete and we are moving toward full production. We can only
predict that this will occur sometime this year. It is our intent to test
our (CMS) field unit in Canada on a flare gas application.

Thank you for your interest.

Kyle King
Canadian Microturbine Systems




David  Reid wrote:
Jim,
  Would like some more info on your Paragon series Micro Turbine at
  some point (no hurry) including indicative prices. Thanks.
Best regards, David Reid
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
78 Wade River Rd, Whangaparaoa, Auckland 1463, New Zealand
--
  Jim Fiddler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] CMS Paragon mini turbine

2001-05-29 Thread david e cruse

Hi David R.,
   Thanks for the info. Off the topic of
miniturbines---What is the best way to figure the
cost per gallon of the biodiesel you make, is there a
general formula or do you have to figure down to
the smallest expense you incur , and tally everything up,
and then do an average on the whole thing ?
Just wondering !

David C.
- Original Message -
From: David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: [biofuel] CMS Paragon mini turbine


 Hi David C and others who are interested,
 Just received
the following reply re Paragon mini turbine.
 B.r.,  David


 Mr Reid:

 As EPI is currently testing our first unit at a land fill site in New
 Jersey, firm technical data and costs will not be available until such
time
 as testing is complete and we are moving toward full production. We can
only
 predict that this will occur sometime this year. It is our intent to test
 our (CMS) field unit in Canada on a flare gas application.

 Thank you for your interest.

 Kyle King
 Canadian Microturbine Systems




 David  Reid wrote:
 Jim,
   Would like some more info on your Paragon series Micro Turbine at
   some point (no hurry) including indicative prices. Thanks.
 Best regards, David Reid
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 78 Wade River Rd, Whangaparaoa, Auckland 1463, New Zealand
 --
   Jim Fiddler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread simon_wells

The standards can be found at
http://www.biodiesel-intl.com/standards_e/haupt.htm

http://www.wisa-lab.de/Rapsoel.htm gives the relevent test numbers,
unfortuantley, I've not found where to get details of the tests other than
buying them.

Simon



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread Gary and Jos Kimlin

In retirement I edit PHD thesis for pocket money, I've probably learnt more
this way than any other. One thing I have learnt:
Whatever method they use, any of us should be able to duplicate the results
by following the procedure as reported, all else is BS. Harry


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] What about making engine oil?

2001-05-29 Thread steve spence

I did the indoor toilet with an m80, but that was 20 years ago. surly the
statute of limitations has run out? ;-)

Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children.
--

- Original Message -
From: David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] What about making engine oil?


 You want the webpage as well? I see 4 high school students here got
 suspended for making a bomb that demolished an outdoor toilet block from a
 recipe and how to page they found on the web. The Timothy McVeighs of this
 world dont die so easy eh?
 B.r.,  David

 - Original Message -
 From: steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [biofuel] What about making engine oil?


  firemen, making alternative fuels. hmmm
 
  you guys like things that go bang as well? ;-)
 
  Steve Spence



 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread ellisd

It's really funny that they claim a 10-24% increase in milage and HP 
yet the emitions are cut by 70-80%. To me, it just doesn't seem to be 
right. 
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence. notice how 
they get
 all upset when you ask them to prove it. especially when it's not 
evidence
 that they themselves have seen, but are parroting from someone else.
 
 so and so told me, or I saw a video doesn't cut it. show me peer
 reviewed science that proves the claims, explains the science, or 
shut up
 about this crap.
 
 It's heartening to see that some folks can still think logically, 
and not
 get caught up in the religious fervor.
 
 
 Steve Spence
 Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
 http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm
 
 Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
 Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
 X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
 We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
 we borrow it from our children.
 --
 
 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:42 AM
 Subject: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.
 
 
  In some of the test that claim they got better milage and such, 
some
  investigations found out that the people tuned the engine up after
  the put the magnets on then ran the 2nd part of the test..
  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's amazing that the people still buy into the magnet stuff. 
The
   EPA
has test all the magic magnet devices and even some of
those magicals metal ionizing pipes (just an aluminum pipe 
and
other means of boosting you ecomony. The EPA only found one
  device
based on magnets that show any difference, but it was small 
boost
like maybe 1%, which I think was a fluke. Remember, if the
  company
say it's EPA certified, it's BS.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], beeteljeuse beelzebub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
   EPA tests are the biggest jokes known in history. I was
  involuntarily
   detained once via highway patrol by an EPA test. They were 
checking
   emissions on early and late model vehicles. When they got to 
mine,
   they checked it once, scratched their heads and did it again.
   They ran the test a third time and asked me to pop open my hood.
  They
   feverishly checked everything under the sun to find out what I 
had
   altered to get such low readings, but could not find anything 
out
  of
   the ordinary. It was a stone-cold stock '68 Plymouth Valient 
that
   with absolutely no emissions controls, that was getting 
extremely
   lower emissions than that of brand new cars that were being 
checked.
   There are many things on the EPA lists of things that do not 
work
   that we have found benifits.
   You say that they have tested all the magic magnet devices.
   I say impossible. There are some that a select few people even
  know
   about that are in the trial stages now. How does EPA test 
those??
   EPA is not God. Trust them like you would the oil and gas 
crooks.
  
   The man that did the magnet test on the gen set paid over 
$10,000
  on
   a professional gas analyser to test emissions and air/fuel 
ratios.
  
   Here is a quote from my previous post that no one seemed to 
comment
   about.
  
   The AFR was adjusted and a further
 test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. 
The
  AFR
was
 meassured as being 21.5/1.
 When the magnets where removed, with the engine still 
running,
   the  HC
 reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something 
is
  
   going
 on for there sure.
  
   As for the air/fuel ratio, it was obtained by his own 
invention. A
   vaporizing carburetor that he plans to market in the near 
future.
   Also note the HC readings measured in parts per million goes 
down
   after removing the magnets. It does not take a rocket scientist 
or
  an
   EPA goon to notice that, like the man said, Something is going 
on
   for sure.
   Driving conditions did not come into play with this test and the
   generator was under the same load in all the testing.
  
   Have Fun,
   Sam
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread John Li

I tried it in my Nissan Pathfinder V6 EFI 1995 model, and got a smoother 
running engine.  It felt like you are adding octane booster to the fuel tank.  
Here is how I did it.
  
I placed an extremely powerful magnet (one that can cause small injuries if you 
are not careful), 1x2x1/4in., on top of the fuel line (rubber) after the fuel 
filter and before the injectors and taped it.. The result was an instant 
smoother engine.  I tried to drive it around and it was really smoother and 
quiieter.  It might just be my imagination .  The next day, I put another 
magnet on the opposite side of the first magnet. So the rubber hose was already 
in between the 2 magnets.  I taped the magnets together, thinking it would 
further improve the smoothness or increase the power. But the result was the 
opposite.  The power and smoothness was lesser than when using one magnet only. 
 So now, I removed the magnet below and left the one on top, as is, and still 
enjoyed the smoothness of the engine.  I still can't believe it worked.  I did 
not do any adjustment.

John
  - Original Message - 
  From: steve spence 
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


  extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence. notice how they get
  all upset when you ask them to prove it. especially when it's not evidence
  that they themselves have seen, but are parroting from someone else.

  so and so told me, or I saw a video doesn't cut it. show me peer
  reviewed science that proves the claims, explains the science, or shut up
  about this crap.

  It's heartening to see that some folks can still think logically, and not
  get caught up in the religious fervor.


  Steve Spence
  Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
  http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

  Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
  Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
  X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
  We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
  we borrow it from our children.
  --

  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:42 AM
  Subject: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


   In some of the test that claim they got better milage and such, some
   investigations found out that the people tuned the engine up after
   the put the magnets on then ran the 2nd part of the test..
   --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's amazing that the people still buy into the magnet stuff. The
EPA
 has test all the magic magnet devices and even some of
 those magicals metal ionizing pipes (just an aluminum pipe and
 other means of boosting you ecomony. The EPA only found one
   device
 based on magnets that show any difference, but it was small boost
 like maybe 1%, which I think was a fluke. Remember, if the
   company
 say it's EPA certified, it's BS.
 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], beeteljeuse beelzebub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   
EPA tests are the biggest jokes known in history. I was
   involuntarily
detained once via highway patrol by an EPA test. They were checking
emissions on early and late model vehicles. When they got to mine,
they checked it once, scratched their heads and did it again.
They ran the test a third time and asked me to pop open my hood.
   They
feverishly checked everything under the sun to find out what I had
altered to get such low readings, but could not find anything out
   of
the ordinary. It was a stone-cold stock '68 Plymouth Valient that
with absolutely no emissions controls, that was getting extremely
lower emissions than that of brand new cars that were being checked.
There are many things on the EPA lists of things that do not work
that we have found benifits.
You say that they have tested all the magic magnet devices.
I say impossible. There are some that a select few people even
   know
about that are in the trial stages now. How does EPA test those??
EPA is not God. Trust them like you would the oil and gas crooks.
   
The man that did the magnet test on the gen set paid over $10,000
   on
a professional gas analyser to test emissions and air/fuel ratios.
   
Here is a quote from my previous post that no one seemed to comment
about.
   
The AFR was adjusted and a further
  test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The
   AFR
 was
  meassured as being 21.5/1.
  When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running,
the  HC
  reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is
   
going
  on for there sure.
   
As for the air/fuel ratio, it was obtained by his own invention. A
vaporizing carburetor that he 

Re: [biofuel] biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread bob golding

I was told by my local trading standards office that they would be happy if
bio diesel came up to BS EN590 standard. Does anyone know what this is .

bob golding
- Original Message -
From: simon_wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:39 AM
Subject: [biofuel] biodiesel standard


 The standards can be found at
 http://www.biodiesel-intl.com/standards_e/haupt.htm

 http://www.wisa-lab.de/Rapsoel.htm gives the relevent test numbers,
 unfortuantley, I've not found where to get details of the tests other than
 buying them.

 Simon



 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] bouncing mail

2001-05-29 Thread steve spence

I'm getting it too.

Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children.
--

- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:40 PM
Subject: [biofuel] bouncing mail


 Is anyone else getting Permanent Delivery Failure messages from
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] after posting to the list saying their message
 could not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I know this happened to another list member a couple of weeks ago,
 now it's happening to me. It says Requested mail action aborted:
 exceeded storage allocation, which should be Mr Doval's problem or
 Helbig.com's problem or Yahoo's problem but not ours.

 He is a list member, by the way, but Yahoo has no record of his mail
bouncing.

 I wrote to Mr Doval but it bounced. Of course. If anyone else is
 being bothered I'll unsubscribe him.

 Thanks

 Keith Addison
 Journey to Forever
 Handmade Projects
 Tokyo
 http://journeytoforever.org/

 Biofuel list owner

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] of magnets and testing

2001-05-29 Thread Dick Carlstein

i fully realize that this is basically a discussion forum, not a posting
board for eccentric experiments. still, i find that one way of defending a
position in a discussion is by describing the results obtained in actual
trials.

i find that there are theorists who will either support or reject a given
idea without ever having tried it out.

and then i find that there are those who will try the idea out, and find it
did work for them, or that it did not.

the first posture is an invitation to extended exchange of arguments, the
participants choosing feeling over facts.

the second posture promotes feedback, and further testing, either for or
against. this attitude chooses facts over feelings.

of all the postings on magnets, and fuel economy, the only posting i've read
so far that is pretty much factual is john li's. it's missing some
information, which i will request in the post itself, but otherwise is
straightforward and to the point. it makes no assumptions, just shares
results.

i think this sort of attitude is of greater benefit to all of us, than
sterile discussions based on feelings.

thanks john for trying it out, and sharing with us. more in your post.

 From: John Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: magnets in fuel line.

I tried it in my Nissan Pathfinder V6 EFI 1995 model, and got a smoother
running engine.  It felt like you are adding octane booster to the fuel
tank.  Here is how I did it.

I placed an extremely powerful magnet (one that can cause small injuries if
you are not careful), 1x2x1/4in., on top of the fuel line (rubber) after the
fuel filter and before the injectors and taped it.. The result was an
instant smoother engine.  I tried to drive it around and it was really
smoother and quiieter.  It might just be my imagination .  The next day, I
put another magnet on the opposite side of the first magnet. So the rubber
hose was already in between the 2 magnets.  I taped the magnets together,
thinking it would further improve the smoothness or increase the power. But
the result was the opposite.  The power and smoothness was lesser than when
using one magnet only.  So now, I removed the magnet below and left the one
on top, as is, and still enjoyed the smoothness of the engine.  I still
can't believe it worked.  I did not do any adjustment.

*questions john :

1) type magnet ? (ie ceramic, etc)
2) origin of same (model, etc. if available)
3) i take it your fuel line feeds all injectors ? i am not familiar with
your engine's layout.
4) how far from the nearest injector did you place the magnet ?
5) did you do a polarity test, if yes, what pole was in contact with the
fuel line
6) when you put the other magnet on, did you again do a polarity test, or at
least check to see if the magnets attracted or repelled each other ?
7) i assume the magnets did not touch ?
8) notice any difference when starting the engine ?
9) notice any difference in the idling speed ? (i personally don't think
this is significant. all engines i've worked on run rich at idle)
10) was more low end torque available ?

*thanks for the time john. off to the farm, will eagerly read the postings
come next saturday.

*regards to all, dick.

*ps : please notice my elegant, time saving, considerate
SNIPPING.(:-D)


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] bouncing mail

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Is anyone else getting Permanent Delivery Failure messages from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] after posting to the list saying their message 
could not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I know this happened to another list member a couple of weeks ago, 
now it's happening to me. It says Requested mail action aborted: 
exceeded storage allocation, which should be Mr Doval's problem or 
Helbig.com's problem or Yahoo's problem but not ours.

He is a list member, by the way, but Yahoo has no record of his mail bouncing.

I wrote to Mr Doval but it bounced. Of course. If anyone else is 
being bothered I'll unsubscribe him.

Thanks

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

Biofuel list owner

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] biodiesel standard

2001-05-29 Thread Biofuels

Trading standards only comes into it, in UK, when you make a claim to
something or when complying with law.
Does not apply at present, provided you do not make false claims.
Bob, if in the UK, please contact direct
Terry


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Re: I want to brew my first batch of biodiesel

2001-05-29 Thread Aleksander lt;kac

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], eric almanzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric:
You need in terms of vessels:
1. a large reaction vessel with some sort of stirring. A bottom 
spigot is usefull but not necessary. You can top off your ester.
2. a smaller vessel (25% min of larger) for methoxide preparation
with some kind of stirring also - spigot is optional
3. a plastic washing vessel at least 1.5  times as big as the main 
reaction vessel. Again, bottom spigot is a useful option.

... and, yes, biodiesel has to be washed.

Reactants awailability depends on where you live. Browse the archive 
of the group.

Cheers, Aleks



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Ruling - Re: [biofuel] of magnets and testing

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Hi Dick and all

I pretty much agree with you, Dick, with the exception that while 
John Li's posting was interesting, I don't think it was very useful. 
I don't want to be discouraging, but subjective impressions such as 
smoother and quieter don't really add much, and don't impress the 
sceptics. Same goes for It didn't work for me - what exactly didn't 
work? There are a lot of variables. Meanwhile people are getting 
annoyed, and it's bordering on a flame war.

Much of this thread is a pointless argument between true believers 
(alleged to be incapable of rational thought) and sceptics (said to 
have closed minds). Well, there should be room for both dreamers 
(dreaming is not necessarily idle or foolish) and sceptics (too much 
scepticism can be just as foolish as too much dreaming), and God 
forbid the one without the other. But if they can't meet halfway, and 
it seems they can't, then tempers will get frayed and nothing 
achieved.

It's up to those making claims for magnets improving 
performance-efficiency to prove it, not up to those who disagree to 
disprove it.

We haven't had much that's substantive. Impressions, yes. Sam's 
results were second-hand, and all of us might not have spare engines 
and $10,000 in test equipment to throw at the problem. Dick's 
questions below for John Li are a good starting point. Harry's 
comment is relevant: Whatever method they use, any of us should be 
able to duplicate the results by following the procedure as reported, 
all else is BS.

So, anyone who wants to experiment with magnets, please go ahead. But 
let's not have any further discussion on this subject unless it's 
substantive, not just subjective, and provides some results that are 
replicable.

It can be difficult to elimate subjective factors. For instance, when 
doing mileage tests it's very easy to be much more feather-footed 
than usual, without realising it.

If we can apply some rigour to this question we'll have done 
something useful, whatever the results. If not, it'll just be 
divisive.

All best

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

Biofuel list owner

i fully realize that this is basically a discussion forum, not a posting
board for eccentric experiments. still, i find that one way of defending a
position in a discussion is by describing the results obtained in actual
trials.

i find that there are theorists who will either support or reject a given
idea without ever having tried it out.

and then i find that there are those who will try the idea out, and find it
did work for them, or that it did not.

the first posture is an invitation to extended exchange of arguments, the
participants choosing feeling over facts.

the second posture promotes feedback, and further testing, either for or
against. this attitude chooses facts over feelings.

of all the postings on magnets, and fuel economy, the only posting i've read
so far that is pretty much factual is john li's. it's missing some
information, which i will request in the post itself, but otherwise is
straightforward and to the point. it makes no assumptions, just shares
results.

i think this sort of attitude is of greater benefit to all of us, than
sterile discussions based on feelings.

thanks john for trying it out, and sharing with us. more in your post.

 From: John Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: magnets in fuel line.

I tried it in my Nissan Pathfinder V6 EFI 1995 model, and got a smoother
running engine.  It felt like you are adding octane booster to the fuel
tank.  Here is how I did it.

I placed an extremely powerful magnet (one that can cause small injuries if
you are not careful), 1x2x1/4in., on top of the fuel line (rubber) after the
fuel filter and before the injectors and taped it.. The result was an
instant smoother engine.  I tried to drive it around and it was really
smoother and quiieter.  It might just be my imagination .  The next day, I
put another magnet on the opposite side of the first magnet. So the rubber
hose was already in between the 2 magnets.  I taped the magnets together,
thinking it would further improve the smoothness or increase the power. But
the result was the opposite.  The power and smoothness was lesser than when
using one magnet only.  So now, I removed the magnet below and left the one
on top, as is, and still enjoyed the smoothness of the engine.  I still
can't believe it worked.  I did not do any adjustment.

*questions john :

1) type magnet ? (ie ceramic, etc)
2) origin of same (model, etc. if available)
3) i take it your fuel line feeds all injectors ? i am not familiar with
your engine's layout.
4) how far from the nearest injector did you place the magnet ?
5) did you do a polarity test, if yes, what pole was in contact with the
fuel line
6) when you put the other magnet on, did you again do a polarity test, or at
least check to see if the magnets attracted or repelled each other ?
7) i assume the magnets did not touch ?
8) notice 

Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread John Li

Attn Steve,

I am very particular of the true octane rating of the gasoline. My vehicle 
which I tested with the magnet is a 1995 Nissan Pathfinder equipped with an 
anti- knock compensator in which a sensor that detects 'pings' or 'knocks' 
would automatically retard the engine timing in order to eliminate knocking.  
The whole system is done by an on-board  computer that controls the EFI and 
others.  The gasoline octane required by my car is 90 octane and above.  The 
highest octane rating available here in the Philippines is 97octane, which 
supposedly will not cause any knocking.  But it does, especially during 
acceleration.  So I have reason to believe that the petroleum companies are 
cheating the consumers and would presume that the octane rating is below 90.  
Otherwise with my car's requirement of 90 octane, there should be no knocking 
observed.  So after the attachment of the magnet, the knocking sound was 
eliminated and it felt like you are adding octane booster.  If you still 
question !
my knowledge of the octane booster, let me tell you that I used to add avgas 
(aviation gasoline for the planes) which has an octane ratng of 100.  I had to 
buy it at the airport and added it to my fuel tank.  The result was the same as 
when I put the magnet. As I mentioned earlier, it is quieter and smoother 
especially during acceleration.  I decided to test this magnet thing because 
there are too many discussions made that I almost decided to 'unsubscribe'.  I 
heard of this magnet thing 10 years ago, never tried it because I did not 
believe it.  Last March, in one of Japan's leading off-road magazine called 
4x4 Magazine, on page 103, there was an article entitled Environmental 
Friendly and Powerful which featured a Mitsubishi Delica Star Wagon with 4D56 
diesel engine equipped with a strong magnet.  It says  strong magnet reduced 
the amount of black smoke from the exhaust.  If you want more power, but if you 
end up spouting with lots of black smoke, that would be a proble!
m.  Power Green is a product that uses strong magnetism to alter fuel at the 
atomic level and it can be easily be fitted into your car by cutting and 
inserting it into fuel line.  It has the effect of cutting down black smoke.  
I was intrigued by this article but the thought just passed  by until last week 
when you wrote that you did not believe in this ( and neither did I.  I was 
never a believer because I have already wasted so much time and money in fuel 
devices as mini turbo charger, putting lead in the fuel tank, buying expensive 
sparkplugs, etc.) and I decided to test it by myself because I had 2 very 
powerful magnets which I purchased from Kuffman Surplus in Orange County 
California in 1994. I asked the storekeeper where it came from.  He did not 
know.  It is so powerful that one should be very careful not to be pinned 
especially between 2 pices of these magnets. And if you are questioning again 
about octane rating, I had been testing that avgas fuel with 100 octane wi!
th my older car which was a Mitsubishi Lancer 1600 twin carburetor with 
compression ratio of 9.5:1 which required an octane rating of 97.  I seldom 
used the car coz I could only buy the fuel when I went to the airport.  And the 
knock of the car when I used commercial fuel from the pumping station which 
they claimed to contain 97octane, was like hell.  I had to manually readjust 
the ignition timing (retard).  The specification was 10degrees +- 2 degrees.  
But I had to retard it to 5 degrees.  The result was loss of power and stalling 
during acceleration. I have been trying it for several years, by adjusting and 
adding additives. Everytime I used avgas, I set it at 10 degrees.  No knock and 
a very smooth running engine.  Re the magnet, I just tried it 1 week ago, 
before I wrote to the group.  So it's up to you to believe it or not.  If you 
want more info re the article in the JApanese magazine, just write to me.  I 
came to join this group in the hope of finding some info about c!
oconut oil for biodiesel.  Actually I am a very busy guy who is gathering 
information about cocodiesel and minding my own business.  But I was challenged 
to try this magnet thing. And before I unsubscribe (because I cannot read all 
the mails that have been flooding my inbox), I would just like to share what I 
experienced.

That's all, folks.
John
  - Original Message - 
  From: steve spence 
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:23 AM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


  unless your engine is knocking badly, you won't feel any difference with an
  octane booster.

  Steve Spence
  Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
  http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

  Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
  Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
  X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
  We do not inherit the earth 

[biofuel] Coco-diesel - Engine repair claims turned down

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

I've been expecting something like this. I've had doubts that this 
SVO mixture that's being misnamed biodiesel would escape the need 
for a dual-fuel system. This could do a lot of harm. Not cleaning the 
filters either. Mess. :-(

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 


Engine repair claims turned down

Bangkok Post 28 May 2001
Carmakers, insurers want fuel regulated
Walailak Keeratipipatpong
Santan Santivimolnat

Motorists keen to use biodiesel as fuel are thinking twice as 
carmakers and insurance companies are refusing to take responsibility 
for engine damage.

Repair guarantees and insurance will not cover the damage until 
specifications of alternative fuels are set by regulators, the 
companies say.

A Nakhon Pathom motorist, Praphan Morakotchinda, 26, is a test case. 
The employee of a private company filled the tank of his Ford Ranger 
pickup with 16 litres of biodiesel, which cost him 200 baht from a 
filling station in Sampran district.

When he turned on the ignition, the engine started working but the 
car did not move. He added more diesel oil to the tank, but to no 
avail.

A technician inspected the engine and told him to replace the filter, 
which was full of dirt and grease. However, the pickup would not 
budge until all the fuel had been pumped out and replaced by 
undiluted diesel oil.

The owner of the service station told Mr Praphan that he had bought 
the biodiesel from Samut Sakhon. The mixture contained 30% diesel oil 
and 70% coconut oil.

As the pickup was still covered by a sales warranty, Mr Praphan asked 
whether his car dealer would replace the filter at no charge. The 
dealer refused. As well, Mr Praphan's insurance company declined to 
pay the cost of replacing the filter.

Insurance industry spokesmen say they are worried there will be a 
rash of claims resulting from the increasing use of many types of 
blended fuels, none of which are covered by regulations.

Nopadol Santipakorn, vice-chairman of the auto insurance group of the 
General Insurance Association, said engine damage caused by the use 
of non-regulated petroleum products would not be covered by insurance.

Insurance covers damage to the bodywork and engine in an accident, 
not the use of fuels other than those specified in the driver's 
manual.

If a motorist wanted additional coverage for alternative fuels, it 
could be obtained through buying a special insurance policy against 
damage by innovations and inventions. New types of drugs, tyres and 
fuel would fall in this category, he said.

Noravat Suwan, head of the Insurance Department, said that under 
current regulations vehicle-friendly biodiesel must be at least 90% 
diesel oil, the other ingredient being purified palm or coconut oil, 
as stated by the Petroleum Authority of Thailand.

An employee of Tri Petch Isuzu Sales Co, the country's biggest seller 
of light trucks, said the company would accept claims only if the 
vehicle had been used according to the conditions specified in the 
warranty.

He said that no industry organisation or state agency had yet 
certified biofuels, especially biodiesel, as suitable for auto 
engines. Therefore, it was difficult to accept repair claims. 
However, the company would check whether the breakdown was due to 
biofuels or defective engine parts.

A mechanic at Toyota Mahanakhorn Co, a major Toyota dealer in 
Bangkok, said he could not confirm whether the warranty was 
invalidated if Toyota trucks were powered by biofuels.

For any claim that is outside the warranty conditions, the dealers 
have to consult the carmakers, he said. The warranty terms for 
Toyota pickups stated that only diesel fuel with a cetane value of 45 
or higher could be used. Cetane improves combustion efficiency to 
increase power in diesel engines.

Mingkwan Saengsuwan, spokesman for Toyota Motor Thailand Co, said he 
could not confirm the company's position on the issue as it was for 
senior policy makers to decide.

A senior staff member at MMC Sittipol Co, the Mitsubishi distributor, 
said that the company could not accept claims for breakdowns caused 
by alternative fuels until the industry was properly regulated.

Komkrit Nongswadi, spokesman for Ford Sales Thailand Co, said that in 
general, if motorists breached warranties that stipulated only fossil 
fuels could be used, claims would be refused.

Many car companies have upgraded their warranties to three years or 
100,000 kilometres.

 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





RE: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread Hanns B. Wetzel

Hello John,

Read your message and noted that you are interested in coconut oil for bio
diesel. So am I. For security reason the list monitor cannot allow
attachments, if you are interested I will attach a paper by Dr. Dan
Etherington presented at the 19th Pacific Science Congress in 1999, if you
send me your email address.

Hanns

-Original Message-
From: John Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2001 4:37 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


Attn Steve,

I am very particular of the true octane rating of the gasoline. My vehicle
which I tested with the magnet is a 1995 Nissan Pathfinder equipped with an
anti- knock compensator in which a sensor that detects 'pings' or 'knocks'
would automatically retard the engine timing in order to eliminate knocking.
The whole system is done by an on-board  computer that controls the EFI and
others.  The gasoline octane required by my car is 90 octane and above.  The
highest octane rating available here in the Philippines is 97octane, which
supposedly will not cause any knocking.  But it does, especially during
acceleration.  So I have reason to believe that the petroleum companies are
cheating the consumers and would presume that the octane rating is below 90.
Otherwise with my car's requirement of 90 octane, there should be no
knocking observed.  So after the attachment of the magnet, the knocking
sound was eliminated and it felt like you are adding octane booster.  If you
still question my knowledge of the octane booster, let me tell you that I
used to add avgas (aviation gasoline for the planes) which has an octane
ratng of 100.  I had to buy it at the airport and added it to my fuel tank.
The result was the same as when I put the magnet. As I mentioned earlier, it
is quieter and smoother especially during acceleration.  I decided to test
this magnet thing because there are too many discussions made that I almost
decided to 'unsubscribe'.  I heard of this magnet thing 10 years ago, never
tried it because I did not believe it.  Last March, in one of Japan's
leading off-road magazine called 4x4 Magazine, on page 103, there was an
article entitled Environmental Friendly and Powerful which featured a
Mitsubishi Delica Star Wagon with 4D56 diesel engine equipped with a strong
magnet.  It says  strong magnet reduced the amount of black smoke from the
exhaust.  If you want more power, but if you end up spouting with lots of
black smoke, that would be a problem.  Power Green is a product that uses
strong magnetism to alter fuel at the atomic level and it can be easily be
fitted into your car by cutting and inserting it into fuel line.  It has the
effect of cutting down black smoke.  I was intrigued by this article but
the thought just passed  by until last week when you wrote that you did not
believe in this ( and neither did I.  I was never a believer because I have
already wasted so much time and money in fuel devices as mini turbo charger,
putting lead in the fuel tank, buying expensive sparkplugs, etc.) and I
decided to test it by myself because I had 2 very powerful magnets which I
purchased from Kuffman Surplus in Orange County California in 1994. I asked
the storekeeper where it came from.  He did not know.  It is so powerful
that one should be very careful not to be pinned especially between 2 pices
of these magnets. And if you are questioning again about octane rating, I
had been testing that avgas fuel with 100 octane with my older car which was
a Mitsubishi Lancer 1600 twin carburetor with compression ratio of 9.5:1
which required an octane rating of 97.  I seldom used the car coz I could
only buy the fuel when I went to the airport.  And the knock of the car when
I used commercial fuel from the pumping station which they claimed to
contain 97octane, was like hell.  I had to manually readjust the ignition
timing (retard).  The specification was 10degrees +- 2 degrees.  But I had
to retard it to 5 degrees.  The result was loss of power and stalling during
acceleration. I have been trying it for several years, by adjusting and
adding additives. Everytime I used avgas, I set it at 10 degrees.  No knock
and a very smooth running engine.  Re the magnet, I just tried it 1 week
ago, before I wrote to the group.  So it's up to you to believe it or not.
If you want more info re the article in the JApanese magazine, just write to
me.  I came to join this group in the hope of finding some info about
coconut oil for biodiesel.  Actually I am a very busy guy who is gathering
information about cocodiesel and minding my own business.  But I was
challenged to try this magnet thing. And before I unsubscribe (because I
cannot read all the mails that have been flooding my inbox), I would just
like to share what I experienced.

That's all, folks.
John
  - Original Message -
  From: steve spence
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:23 AM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] 

RE: [biofuel] Coco-diesel - Engine repair claims turned down

2001-05-29 Thread Hanns B. Wetzel

High quality coconut oil has been tested at the University of Wollongong
(Australia) in recent years which apparently reached the conclusion that
diesel engines used in generators, marine engines and vehicles can run on
such coconut oil. At these tests, the oil has demonstrated excellent
credentials for use as a replacement fuel for diesel in compression ignition
engines and the tests have shown it to equal or exceed the specifications of
petro diesel in all respects at temperatures above 35 degrees Celsius.

I have a paper on the subject if you are interested.

Probably the 70/30 mixture in Thailand contained unrefined oil straight from
the copra mill. This is pretty filthy stuff and I am not surprised it messed
up the engine.

Hanns

-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2001 4:56 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [biofuel] Coco-diesel - Engine repair claims turned down


I've been expecting something like this. I've had doubts that this
SVO mixture that's being misnamed biodiesel would escape the need
for a dual-fuel system. This could do a lot of harm. Not cleaning the
filters either. Mess. :-(

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/




Engine repair claims turned down

Bangkok Post 28 May 2001
Carmakers, insurers want fuel regulated
Walailak Keeratipipatpong
Santan Santivimolnat

Motorists keen to use biodiesel as fuel are thinking twice as
carmakers and insurance companies are refusing to take responsibility
for engine damage.

Repair guarantees and insurance will not cover the damage until
specifications of alternative fuels are set by regulators, the
companies say.

A Nakhon Pathom motorist, Praphan Morakotchinda, 26, is a test case.
The employee of a private company filled the tank of his Ford Ranger
pickup with 16 litres of biodiesel, which cost him 200 baht from a
filling station in Sampran district.

When he turned on the ignition, the engine started working but the
car did not move. He added more diesel oil to the tank, but to no
avail.

A technician inspected the engine and told him to replace the filter,
which was full of dirt and grease. However, the pickup would not
budge until all the fuel had been pumped out and replaced by
undiluted diesel oil.

The owner of the service station told Mr Praphan that he had bought
the biodiesel from Samut Sakhon. The mixture contained 30% diesel oil
and 70% coconut oil.

As the pickup was still covered by a sales warranty, Mr Praphan asked
whether his car dealer would replace the filter at no charge. The
dealer refused. As well, Mr Praphan's insurance company declined to
pay the cost of replacing the filter.

Insurance industry spokesmen say they are worried there will be a
rash of claims resulting from the increasing use of many types of
blended fuels, none of which are covered by regulations.

Nopadol Santipakorn, vice-chairman of the auto insurance group of the
General Insurance Association, said engine damage caused by the use
of non-regulated petroleum products would not be covered by insurance.

Insurance covers damage to the bodywork and engine in an accident,
not the use of fuels other than those specified in the driver's
manual.

If a motorist wanted additional coverage for alternative fuels, it
could be obtained through buying a special insurance policy against
damage by innovations and inventions. New types of drugs, tyres and
fuel would fall in this category, he said.

Noravat Suwan, head of the Insurance Department, said that under
current regulations vehicle-friendly biodiesel must be at least 90%
diesel oil, the other ingredient being purified palm or coconut oil,
as stated by the Petroleum Authority of Thailand.

An employee of Tri Petch Isuzu Sales Co, the country's biggest seller
of light trucks, said the company would accept claims only if the
vehicle had been used according to the conditions specified in the
warranty.

He said that no industry organisation or state agency had yet
certified biofuels, especially biodiesel, as suitable for auto
engines. Therefore, it was difficult to accept repair claims.
However, the company would check whether the breakdown was due to
biofuels or defective engine parts.

A mechanic at Toyota Mahanakhorn Co, a major Toyota dealer in
Bangkok, said he could not confirm whether the warranty was
invalidated if Toyota trucks were powered by biofuels.

For any claim that is outside the warranty conditions, the dealers
have to consult the carmakers, he said. The warranty terms for
Toyota pickups stated that only diesel fuel with a cetane value of 45
or higher could be used. Cetane improves combustion efficiency to
increase power in diesel engines.

Mingkwan Saengsuwan, spokesman for Toyota Motor Thailand Co, said he
could not confirm the company's position on the issue as it was for
senior policy makers to decide.

A senior staff member at MMC Sittipol Co, the 

Re: [biofuel] of magnets and testing

2001-05-29 Thread Gary and Jos Kimlin

In a previous posting I insist that an empirical trial that can be
replicated by others using the original method described is necessary for
the credibility of technical claims. This is what most of us are doing with
bio diesel production, having replicated the results of others we extend the
envelope and report on our findings in a manner that allows others to
replicate our results. This is the scientific method. There are things that
I accept on faith alone- they are to do with my spirituality- I try not to
confuse the two. I do not require that others do the same, however be aware
that I may exhibit tolerant skepticism of claims that appear to defy
empirical replication. I am always happy to change my position in the light
of peer review.



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.

2001-05-29 Thread John

As a qualified Automotive engineer, I agree, with an Air fuel  Ratio of
21.5:1 it would be not be running too well at all, unless the engine in
question had air injection and that would make it appear to be running as
lean as that.
The normal AFR is 14.7:1
John McLean AMIAME
Australia
- Original Message -
From: steve spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


 The AFR was adjusted and a further
   test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The AFR
  was
   meassured as being 21.5/1.
   When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running,
 the  HC
   reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is 
 going
   on for there sure.

 the only thing going on is the begining of a scam. these numbers look like
 an outright fabrication.

 Steve Spence
 Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
 http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm

 Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
 Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
 X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
 We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
 we borrow it from our children.
 --

 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 9:37 AM
 Subject: [biofuel] Re: magnets in fuel line.


  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It's amazing that the people still buy into the magnet stuff. The
  EPA
   has test all the magic magnet devices and even some of
   those magicals metal ionizing pipes (just an aluminum pipe and
   other means of boosting you ecomony. The EPA only found one device
   based on magnets that show any difference, but it was small boost
   like maybe 1%, which I think was a fluke. Remember, if the company
   say it's EPA certified, it's BS.
   --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], beeteljeuse beelzebub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 
  EPA tests are the biggest jokes known in history. I was involuntarily
  detained once via highway patrol by an EPA test. They were checking
  emissions on early and late model vehicles. When they got to mine,
  they checked it once, scratched their heads and did it again.
  They ran the test a third time and asked me to pop open my hood. They
  feverishly checked everything under the sun to find out what I had
  altered to get such low readings, but could not find anything out of
  the ordinary. It was a stone-cold stock '68 Plymouth Valient that
  with absolutely no emissions controls, that was getting extremely
  lower emissions than that of brand new cars that were being checked.
  There are many things on the EPA lists of things that do not work
  that we have found benifits.
  You say that they have tested all the magic magnet devices.
  I say impossible. There are some that a select few people even know
  about that are in the trial stages now. How does EPA test those??
  EPA is not God. Trust them like you would the oil and gas crooks.
 
  The man that did the magnet test on the gen set paid over $10,000 on
  a professional gas analyser to test emissions and air/fuel ratios.
 
  Here is a quote from my previous post that no one seemed to comment
  about.
 
  The AFR was adjusted and a further
test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The AFR
   was
meassured as being 21.5/1.
When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running,
  the  HC
reading went up immidiately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is 
  going
on for there sure.
 
  As for the air/fuel ratio, it was obtained by his own invention. A
  vaporizing carburetor that he plans to market in the near future.
  Also note the HC readings measured in parts per million goes down
  after removing the magnets. It does not take a rocket scientist or an
  EPA goon to notice that, like the man said, Something is going on
  for sure.
  Driving conditions did not come into play with this test and the
  generator was under the same load in all the testing.
 
  Have Fun,
  Sam
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 


 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] Coco-diesel - Engine repair claims turned down

2001-05-29 Thread Gary and Jos Kimlin

Hi Hanns,
I would be very interested in that paper on coconut oil. If we go commercial
here (a long way off) I would like to have some of our past students from
the Pacific export coco esters to us to produce a winter grade of biodiesel.
The income stream would be good for all concerned.
From Harry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] of magnets and testing

2001-05-29 Thread Gary and Jos Kimlin

P.S. My comment on reorganisation of  molecules could be taken a little
seriously if there is a possibility of induced or real polarity of the
molecules concerned, instead of placing the other magnet opposite the first
try it in line to effectively lengthen the lines of force parallel to the
fuel line. Its just a hypothesis no harm in feeling an effect at the
hypothesis stage is there. Can you deactivate the knock compensator?
Regards Harry


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] Smith unveils legislation to eliminate MTBE threat

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/may2001/2001L-05-28-09.html

Smith unveils legislation to eliminate MTBE threat

WASHINGTON, DC, May 28, 2001 (ENS) - Senator Bob Smith has introduced 
legislation to ban MTBE and authorize cleanup funds for groundwater 
contaminated by the gasoline additive.

Smith, current chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works 
Committee, introduced new legislation to eliminate the threat posed 
by the common gasoline additive, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). 
This action follows an MTBE hearing that Smith held in Salem, New 
Hampshire, in April.

Once released into the environment, whether spilled or leaked out of 
a storage tank, MTBE quickly finds its way into water supplies 
rendering them undrinkable, Smith said. It is critical for Congress 
to act this year to eliminate this threat from our communities in New 
Hampshire and across the nation. This is a complex issue, but I am 
confident that this legislation strikes the right balance between 
environmental protection, and a stable and reliable fuel supply.

MTBE, an oxygenate, is used in regions of the country that are having 
difficulty complying with toxic air pollution limits in the federal 
Clean Air Act. The additive allows gasoline to burn more cleanly, and 
reduces the toxic emissions from automobiles and other gasoline 
powered vehicles.

Smith's bill would ban the use of MTBE in gasoline and allow state 
governors to waive the oxygen mandate in the Clean Air Act, while 
preserving the environmental benefits of the air toxics limits in the 
statute. The legislation would also provide funds to help transition 
from MTBE to other fuels additives, such as ethanol.

The bill would authorize $200 million to be spent from the existing 
Leaking Underground Storage Tank trust fund to clean up MTBE 
contamination caused by leaking tanks and to address the integrity of 
the underground storage tank program.

I am also very pleased that this bill is consistent with the 
President's National Energy Policy because it will help to reduce the 
intra-regional patchwork of what are known as boutique fuels, 
Smith said. This will ease the burden on refineries and fuel supply, 
which in turn will reduce the risk of increased gas prices for the 
consumer.

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





[biofuel] NO MORE MAGNETS!

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Please, that's ENOUGH about magnets unless you have replicable 
results or useful information on how to achieve them.

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

Biofuel list owner

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 





Re: [biofuel] bouncing mail

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Addison

Biofuels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Twice so far

Thanks Terry. I've stopped it now.

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send unsubscribe messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/