[css-d] css3

Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of boring reasons): 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow 3/ text-shadow Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampers

[css-d] CSS3

Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > Tested in XP/VirtualBox on Ubuntu Ibex: Safari and Chrome both appear to reco

Re: [css-d] css3

Bill Brown wrote: > David Laakso wrote: >> >> > > Tested in XP/VirtualBox on Ubuntu Ibex: > Safari and Chrome both appear to recognize your border-radius, > box-shadow and text-shadow settings as they stand now. > > Hope it helps. Would have respon

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > > Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... > >

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot > of boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow 1/2 combination: Safari - OK, Chrome - FAULTY (looks terrible) > 3/ text-shadow 2: Safari - YES, Chrome - NO. > Known issues: there ar

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Farewell. Time to break-out the coil of rope and take it to the woods... > ~d Hey ... that's *my* line! G -- http://www.gunlaug.no __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss

Re: [css-d] css3

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > David Laakso wrote: >> Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot >> of boring reasons): >> >> 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow > > 1/2 combination: > Safari - OK, > Chrome - FAULTY (looks terrible) > >> 3/ text-shadow > > 2: > Safari - YES, >

Re: [css-d] css3

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:22:05 -0500, David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > > Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... >

Re: [css-d] css3

peter hyde-smith wrote: > > In Chrome 1.0.154.43 on Win Vista SP2, see screen shot here... > > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/laaksoscreenshot.png > > > www.fatpawdesign.com > > Oh, my... "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star" -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming. http://chel

Re: [css-d] css3

David Hucklesby wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:22:05 -0500, David Laakso wrote: > >> Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of >> boring reasons): >> >> 1/ border-radius >> 2/ box-shadow >> 3/ text-shadow >> >> Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not remindi

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah < sarah.atkin...@cookmedical.com> wrote: > Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? > > Define "Start supporting CSS3"? Most of the "major" browsers do. Not sure about IE8, but FF, Safari, and Opera support some CSS3 standards. The

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jack Timmons wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah < > sarah.atkin...@cookmedical.com> wrote: > >> Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? >> >> > Also: http://www.css3.info -- -Jack Timmons http://www.trotlc.com Twitte

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah wrote: > Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? Perhaps the question should be when will CSS3 be officially recommended? Or when browsers start conforming to more of the standards (i.e. border-radius instead of -moz-border-radius

[css-d] CSS3 101

I've lurked on this list, but the level of expertise required to understand posts is beyond my level. I've been to CSS3 design sites (w3school and others). I have 5 (may increase) boxes for data entry. Right now they'er vertically aligned. I'm using rather than because that seems more CSS-ish

[css-d] css3 animations

hey all, I have been working on figuring out css3 animations and have come up with a couple of test pages. http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to @-moz-keyframes and -moz-animati

[css-d] CSS3 Transitions

Hello CSS3 transitions are very amazing and i would try it for a search-bar. But the bar shoud expand to left. Is this possible with transitions? If found no solution to do so. Mny tx Anton __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss

[css-d] CSS3 Selectors

List, I use selectivizr frequently. Do you use this or something like it? What's your method for dealing with, for example, a lack of support for: p:nth-of-type(3n){ color: red; } TIA! -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |

[css-d] CSS3 Transforming

I want the word 'gallery' to rotate when hovered and the words Art/Art2, which are suppose to be individual anchor links, but I haven't added them. The CSS3 rotation transition is not working out, as I thought it would. The word 'gallery' flickers ? (I only have vendor prefixes for Chrome, I rec

[css-d] CSS3 Transformations ?

Hi, I want the word "gallery" to rotate vertically then reveal Art/Art2. Currently I only have in place vendor prefixes for Chrome, if you view the link in any browser other then Chrome all you will see is blue h3 tag "Art / Art2" overlapping the word "gallery", and you may say to me, uhh your

[css-d] css3 selectors

I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if there is, how widely supported is it? It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) lists for instance. ---Tim Climis Computer Coordinator International Services ___

[css-d] css3 pie?

Has anyone used this? css3pie.com Am looking for any positive and negative views on this. Thanks, Jeff __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-di

[css-d] CSS3 Resources Please

Hello CSS Discuss, Looking for some good CSS3 resources/sites. TIA Elli __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List polic

[css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

Hello CSS Discuss, If I recall correctly, child elements inherit the opacity property of parent elements. Meaning, any text within a div with an opacity declaration would then also take on the same values. Has this changed with CSS3? Elli Vizcaino Creating meaningful connections and compelli

[css-d] CSS3 Background-Size

Hello CSS Discuss, I thought one could use background-size in CSS3 for boxed element such as an H tag, in place of having to specify a width and height property to the declaration. But it seems you have to specify it any ways, in order for the element to accommodate the actual size of the ima

[css-d] CSS3+HTML5 || Javascript?

Hello there, I have a feasibility question to those on the list familiar with HTML5 and CSS3 (which I began familiarizing myself with this Sunday). Lately I had the unpleasant occasion of using Bayex for expert system creation. As you may know, expert systems rely on knowledge base, which is fill

Re: [css-d] CSS3 101

Hi Ted, first of all, you use the tags that make sense for your content, not because it is "css-ish". If your data should be presented in a list, because for instance, it constitutes a list of items, thats ok. If it is tabular data, it should go on a table. As for the alignment, you are having is

Re: [css-d] CSS3 101

On 05/12/2012 08:08 PM, Isabel Santos wrote: > Hi Ted, > > first of all, you use the tags that make sense for your content, > not because it is "css-ish". > If your data should be presented in a list, because for instance, > it constitutes a list of items, thats ok. > If it is tabular data, it shou

Re: [css-d] CSS3 101

Thanks so much for the reply...even at this level I have to read it a couple of times. The pointer to a web search will be helpful. Ted Putting your page on a public server and providing a clickable link to it in your post to the list may get you some replies of a more immediate and practical na

Re: [css-d] CSS3 101

On 05/12/2012 10:27 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Thanks so much for the reply...even at this level I have to read it a > couple of times. > The pointer to a web search will be helpful. > Ted > > Putting your page on a public server and providing a clickable link to > it in your post to the list may

Re: [css-d] css3 animations

Le 23 juin 2012 à 04:45, Sandy a écrit : > > http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html > > http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator > turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to > @-moz-keyframes and -moz-animation > is there a way to get the animations and have the css

Re: [css-d] css3 animations

http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to @-moz-keyframes and -moz-animation Under 'options', you can turn vendor prefixed stuff to 'warning'. thanks. You do know that WebKit bro

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Transitions

Define expanding left. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Anton Steiner wrote: > Hello > CSS3 transitions are very amazing and i would try it for a > search-bar. But the bar shoud expand to left. Is this possible with > transitions? If found no solution to do so. > > Mny tx > Anton > > __

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Transitions

Maybe you could use the 'left' property. Generally trial and error is incredibly easy with transitions: set the element to transition every property: element { transition: .3s; } Then try changing its properties on class or :hover / :focus state change, or modify its properties directly with

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

Are you using it for anything mission critical? Personally, I let something like that gracefully degrade. Or, looking at: http://caniuse.com/#search=nth- Seems like contemporary browsers have a handle on that. Sometimes I'll just make sure there's an alternative option (or, it degrades gracefully

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

So far I've only had to really use the :nth-type selectors for tables, and for creating some demos on layouts. When it comes to tables, I'd created an html table-maker that optionally generates helper classes. Outside of tables, I really haven't had projects that required :nth-child support

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Frank Taylor wrote: > So far I've only had to really use the :nth-type selectors for tables, and > for creating some demos on layouts. > > When it comes to tables, I'd created an html table-maker that optionally > generates helper classes. > > Outside of tables,

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

In your exact use case,I've solved the problem by using the adjacent sibling selector. More than three items and I consider things a little too messy; I'll revert to JS or helper classes for more than three items: > > .wrap div{width: 32%;margin-right:2%;float:left} > .wrap div + div + div {

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Frank Taylor wrote: > In your exact use case,I've solved the problem by using the adjacent sibling > selector. More than three items and I consider things a little too messy; > I'll revert to JS or helper classes for more than three items: > > >> >> .wrap div{

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

Your one and only caveat is IE7: if there are HTML comments between the divs, then the adjacent sibling selector doesn't work. In the one case where our CMS was kicking out comments, I reverted to the non-adjacent selector: >> .wrap div ~ div ~ div {margin-right:0;} Mind you, if you're deal

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Thu, March 26, 2009 1:21 pm, Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if > there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) lists > for instance. > No, but you could achieve the same

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if > there is, how widely supported is it? --- Yes! There is. Sintax is: ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Ops! My fault on previous email: > Sintax is: ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. Maurício __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> you could achieve the same thing (for the example you give) using > CSS2.1 adjacent-sibling selectors [1]: > p + ul { > font-style: italic; > } >From the spec: > Adjacent sibling selectors have the following syntax: E1 + E2, where E2 is > the subject of the selector. The selector matche

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Thu, March 26, 2009 2:03 pm, Climis, Tim wrote: > Unless I'm misreading the spec, that would match the and make my list > text italicized, which isn't what I want. I want to match the . > DOH! Yes, I fail - sorry :-( Well, it is lunchtime... -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Mauricio ((Maujor)) Samy Silva wrote: >> I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? >> And if >> there is, how widely supported is it? > -- > ---

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? > And if there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) > lists for instance. Nope, nothing like that exists.

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: > These are the things you need to bring: > > Bananas > Pie > > > Unless I'm misreading the spec, that would match the and make my list > text italicized, which isn't what I want. I want to match the . > > Something like E1 + E2, where E1 is the subject of the selecto

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> Ops! My fault on previous email: > > Sintax is: > ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. Yeah, my testing had just discovered that. :( Digging into the spec to see what was up, it looks like there's not a selector for what I want. Maybe because it would need a second

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

>>> ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. >> The ~ matches all the p elements after a ul element. The + matches a p >> element immediately after a ul element. What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the following

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? > And if there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) > lists for instance. None exists, but you could use jQuery to do it: p.p_before_ul {

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the > following What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any differently, so there's no reason to target it at all. Here's a list: * Something * S

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of > header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more > semantically correct >> What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph >> preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any >> di

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more semantically correct Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 AM, "Climis, Tim" wrote: >> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and >

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> Scott has a valid point here. Maybe this is the way you should be doing it. > Also is it possible to make up ones own elements? That's sorta what XML is > right? If you could do that then you can style it just like a p or h1 tag. He does. And I may do that. I'm not using h6 for anything on thi

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph > preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any > differently, so there's no reason to target it at all. > > Here's a list: > * Something > * Something else > > Instead of: > > Here's a list: > > *something > *some

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: >> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the >> following > > What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph preceding > a list. I don't need the list to be styled any differently, so there's no > reason to target it at all. >

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> How about *adding* a negative top margin to the UL? viz: An interesting idea that I had not thought of. It would work though. ---Tim __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On 27/03/2009, at 4:26 AM, Climis, Tim wrote: > But there are a few things I wish for that would make even more > semantic sense. A. lists contained in paragraphs, or B. a list > header element (like thead or th) Perhaps a definition list could be styled to achieve what you want? http:/

Re: [css-d] [+] css3 pie?

> Has anyone used this? > > css3pie.com No, but I just twitted this: CSS3 Playground by Mike Plate: http://css3.mikeplate.com/ /* cool stuff */ -- Regards, Thierry www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz __ css-d

[css-d] CSS3 media queries

Hello, I'm using CSS3 media queries on a site, and I'd like them to work on IE8 and older browsers. I've read about css3-mediaqueries-js (http://code.google.com/p/css3-mediaqueries-js/), but I don't know how to use the script. I'm including this on my main.css: @media (max-width: 500px) {

[css-d] CSS3 transformations: rotate

Hi. http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-transformations-rotate.html Opera seems not to support it. In IE9's feature list there's no sign of it. :-( HTH bye Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articl

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Resources Please

On 6/29/11 6:57 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: Hello CSS Discuss, Looking for some good CSS3 resources/sites. TIA Elli http://www.css3.info/ http://www.css3.info/> http://css3please.com/ http://css3please.com/> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-roadmap/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-roadmap/> http://www.

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Resources Please

> > Hello CSS Discuss, > > > > Looking for some good CSS3 resources/sites. > > > > TIA > > Elli > > > > > http://www.css3.info/  http://www.css3.info/> > http://css3please.com/  http://css3please.com/> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-roadmap/  > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-roadmap/> > http://www.slides

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Wednesday 2011-10-19 08:36 -0700, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > If I recall correctly, child elements inherit the opacity property > of parent elements. Meaning, any text within a div with an opacity > declaration would then also take on the same values. Has this > changed with CSS3? What happens with

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

I believe this to still be the case. On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > > > Hello CSS Discuss, > > If I recall correctly, child elements inherit the opacity property of parent > elements. Meaning, any text within a div with an opacity declaration would > then also take o

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

>What happens with opacity isn't inheritance, but it does affect all >the descendants of an element.  When an element has opacity less >than 1, the element and all of its descendants get drawn into a >buffer, and then, in a single step, that buffer is drawn with >opacity onto what's underneath the

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > If I recall correctly, child elements inherit the opacity property of parent > elements. Meaning, any text within a div with an opacity declaration would > then also take on the same values. Has this changed with CSS3? As David notes, the de

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

>On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > >> If I recall correctly, child elements inherit the opacity property of parent >> elements. Meaning, any text within a div with an opacity declaration would >> then also take on the same values. Has this changed with CSS3? > >As David notes,

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

I think what it means is the elements get opacity applied - parent and child - simultaneously as if they were separate elements. Out of curiosity, if it was inherited, would the opacity amount get compounded the more levels deep the elements went?? Sent from iOS 5 On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:28 PM

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On 10/20/11 12:28 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: What I'm getting at is, if a box element gets an opacity property with a value of 0.5 for a semi transparent effect, do child elements such as text then display in the browser at that same semi-transparent value? Elli Vizcaino Try it and see. --

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:28 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: >> As David notes, the descendants of a box with opacity applied don't inherit >> that opacity. The property is applied to the (block) box and all its >> descendants. If what you want is a box with a semi-transparent background >> and / or bord

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

  > On 10/20/11 12:28 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: >> What I'm getting at is, if a box element gets an opacity property with > a value of  0.5 for a semi transparent effect, do child elements such as text > then display in the browser at that same semi-transparent value? >> Elli Vizcaino >> > >

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

> On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:28 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > >>> As David notes, the descendants of a box with opacity applied don't > inherit that opacity. The property is applied to the (block) box and all its > descendants. If what you want is a box with a semi-transparent background and > / >

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

> I think what it means is the elements get opacity applied - parent and child > - > simultaneously as if they were separate elements. > > Out of curiosity, if it was inherited, would the opacity amount get > compounded > the more levels deep the elements went?? > > Sent from iOS 5 It se

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

>> That seems like a contradictory statement and leaves me still somewhat > confused. What I'm getting at is, if a box element gets an opacity property > with a value of  0.5 for a semi transparent effect, do child elements such as > text then display in the browser at that same semi-transpare

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On 10/20/2011 11:04 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: On 10/20/11 12:28 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: What I'm getting at is, if a box element gets an opacity property with a value of 0.5 for a semi transparent effect, do child elements such as text then display in the browser at that same semi-transpa

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On 10/20/2011 11:26 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ Just took a loot at the opacity sample. And of course I used, Firebug to inspect code and firebug says that the opacity of 0.5 on the img has been inherited from div.a - this is why I'm confused and unsure t

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > The photoshop analogy helps me get it but then I guess I must be > misunderstanding the meaning of inheritance, can you tell me what exactly > does the definition of inherit mean? Here is the CSS 2.1 definition of 'inherit': http://www.w3.or

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Thursday 2011-10-20 20:09 -0700, Elli Vizcaino wrote: > The photoshop analogy helps me get it but then I guess I must be > misunderstanding the meaning of inheritance, can you tell me what > exactly does the definition of inherit mean? It means that the value of the property gets copied from th

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: >> View this testcase and compare the 2 boxes: >> http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/translucent-transparent.html > Just took a loot at the opacity sample. And of course I used, Firebug to > inspect code and firebug says that the opacity of 0.5 on the

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On 10/20/2011 11:33 PM, Al Sparber wrote: On 10/20/2011 11:04 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: On 10/20/11 12:28 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: What I'm getting at is, if a box element gets an opacity property with a value of 0.5 for a semi transparent effect, do child elements such as text then display

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

On 21/10/2011 2:15 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote: It seems like you get what inherit does/mean and and how it differs from what happens to child elements of a parent with opacity applied. Would you know how to explain the difference? Try this code Elli. #parent { color: white; background: gr

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Opacity Inheritance

> Yes. The better approach is to use rgba colors for elements containing text. > That way only the box is affected and the text (or any other child elements) > remain unaffected. > > RGBA stands for red, green, blue, and alpha. So this declaration renders a > box > 80% opaque, while stuff ins

[css-d] CSS3 control over shapes?

if you picture a store tag..a rectangle with a hole at one end for the string, and that end’s corners each snipped off at appx 45 degrees.. can CSS handle something like that, or would I be better of turning to HTML5 canvas? Thank you John __

[css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

Hi! need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right here: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html HTH ^^/ Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/article

Re: [css-d] CSS3 media queries

On 9/30/10 4:46 AM, Bernat Lleonart wrote: I'm using CSS3 media queries on a site, and I'd like them to work on IE8 and older browsers. I've read about css3-mediaqueries-js (http://code.google.com/p/css3-mediaqueries-js/), but I don't know how to use the script. I'm including this on my ma

[css-d] CSS3 multiple background images

Hi, I think this post will be useful for beginners: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-multiple-background-images.html HTH ^^/ bye Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onweb

Re: [css-d] CSS3 transformations: rotate

On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-transformations-rotate.html > > Opera seems not to support it. -o-transform: rotate() works just fine here (as one would expect for something that is in a spec in early stages of development). Ph

[css-d] CSS3 selector depending on descendants

I'm positive I read up on this a while back but am struggling to find it now and am beginning to suspect I imagined it... Is there a (Mozilla-implemented) CSS3 selector that affects its target only if the target has specific descendants? (So I could specify a hierarchy of 'ul li li' and select

[css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

Hello all, I have for years been smashing down barriers concerning CSS. This may have been on this mailing list or on www-style (CSS WG). I came into this realm of human endeavor just when CSS3 was starting to be implemented by Safari 2 or 3 (back in 2008). My early CSS was an attempt at cre

[css-d] CSS3 transitions only after load

I want to specify a transition for an element, but I only want it to be used if a change is made to a property AFTER the page has loaded. For example, #foo { font-size: 24pt; transition: all 1s linear; -moz-transition all 1s linear; -webkit-transition all 1s linear; } I don't want the change to f

[css-d] [CSS3] [HELP] Nav menu bug

http://www.ineedwebpage.com/ Okay, first things first. This only happens on screens wider than 1200px, as I have media queries set up since it overlaps content. It doesn't anymore since I made it hide itself, but I'll change that AFTER I fix the major site breaking bugs. Here's the problem. The n

[css-d] CSS3 Parse Error on Filter:

I am getting a Parse Error from the W3C Validator for CSS3 for the following: #header h1 { font-family: "Century Gothic", Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 5.5em; font-weight: normal; text-transform:lowercase; color: #FF70B8; line-height

Re: [css-d] CSS3 control over shapes?

Sure, check out http://codepen.io/search?q=tag&limit=all&order=popularity&depth=everything&show_forks=falsefor some ideas On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, John Johnson wrote: > if you picture a store tag..a rectangle with a hole at one end for the > string, and that end's corners each snipped of

[css-d] CSS3 content attribute for page

Hallo all. I'm using CSS3 for pagination in print mode as described in the tutorial. @page { @bottom-center { content: "Page " counter(page) " of " counter (pages); } } This works fine but I would like to extract the text content from the css and put it in a div in the html page: somethin

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

Gabriele Romanato wrote: > Hi! > need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right > here: > > http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html > > HTH ^^/ > > Gabriele Romanato > > CSS is a programming language: albeit, a very simple one. It co

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

At 9:19 PM -0400 8/10/10, David Laakso wrote: >Gabriele Romanato wrote: >> Hi! >> need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right >> here: >> >> http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html >> >> HTH ^^/ >> > > Gabriele Romanato > > >CSS i

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

tedd wrote: > At 9:19 PM -0400 8/10/10, David Laakso wrote: >> Gabriele Romanato wrote: >>> Hi! >>> need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right >>> here: >>> >>> >>> http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html >>> >>> HTH ^^/ >>> >>

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

> -Original Message- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- > boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of david > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:12 PM > To: css-d > Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful > > tedd wrote: &

  1   2   3   >