The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.15.10.
You can find more details on:
https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-51510-release
A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
We look forward to your feedback.
and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for
5.16.0 and defining the priorities.
My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ve some cycles and would like to pick up some JIRAs to work on.
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11.
>>
>> We have 9 issues to address in
submit the release to vote by the end of this
month or beginning of November.
Stay tuned !
Regards
JB
On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11.
>
> We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have
lease to vote next week as well.
I keep you posted.
Regards
JB
On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,
I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11.
We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues
addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit
10.15.1.3 upgrade).
We have two options here:
- still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to
keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance)
- define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the
dependencies.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
--
Jea
onally, I'd prefer something that still ran on Java 8, but I'll
> understand if I'm in the minority.
>
> What benefits do we get from upgrading Derby to 10.15.1.3 and therefore
> requiring Java 9?
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofr
3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Hi Tim,
I agree, let me focus on 5.16.0 running with JDK 8, 9, 11, 12 ...
It makes sense.
I'm completing 5.15.11 now, and 5.16.0 will follow.
Regards
JB
On 31/10/2019 16:53, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 10/31/19 6:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
Hi guys,
I got a consensus as follow:
- 5.15.x: JDK 8 max
- 5.16.x: JDK 8 still compliant, support of JDK 9+
- 5.17.x: JDK 9+ min
I've updated Jira accordingly.
Thanks for your comments !
Regards
JB
On 31/10/2019 11:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As I'
gt; On click of QueName, system displayed me lots of Message IDs.
>
> How can I get its count in .net?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono..
l how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
>>>> resolved.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
>>>>> check it and vote accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
>>> client..
>>>>>
>>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
>>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
>>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
>>>>>
>>>>> The files can be grabbed
>>>>> from:
>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
>>>>>
>>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning.
Regards
JB
On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you
> actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Bap
/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/
Git tag:
activemq-5.15.11
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono
gt;
>> regards,
>>
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>>
>> Le 20/11/2019 à 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly,
>>> probably next week), I&
ion
> process-resource-bundles of goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process failed.:
> NullPointerException -> [Help 1]
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:55 AM jgenender wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>&
Fair enough, let me cancel the vote and cut a new one.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 20/11/2019 16:45, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> I do consider it a blocker because I can't run the unit tests or build from
> the tag so it needs to be fixed.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jea
Hi,
due to build issue on activemq-osgi module, I cancel this vote to submit
a new one (the issue is already fixed, weird I didn't have the issue on
my machine during the vote build).
Regards
JB
On 20/11/2019 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Waiting ActiveMQ
hours.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Here's my +1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly,
> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote.
> This is ta
Just a gently reminder: we would need an additional PMC (binding) vote
to complete this vote.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly,
> probably next week), I'm su
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:05 AM +, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regard
Hi all,
this vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce
+1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC
will help
Thanks a lot !
Much appreciated.
Regards
JB
On 25/11/2019 19:01, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> I promoted the artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.11/
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
Hi guys,
as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on:
- Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image
for ActiveMQ
- Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios)
I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
--
Jea
improved their
> support on docker or not.
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on:
>> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apac
; On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Clebert,
>>
>> The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build.
>>
>> It's what I'm doing for Karaf:
>>
>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags
>
; s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool ... FAILURE [ 1.457
> s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA ..... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring . SKIPPED
>
> Please help to resolve this build error.
>
> Thanks
> Goutam Giri
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
one port and
> picking up (Consumer) from a broker on another can I implement it in
> activemq in apache
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
but
> some trivial fixups remain outstanding.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 12:00, Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
>>
>> JB,
>>
>> Are you still working on the website update and release email for the
>> release?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov
to submit your contributions to the
> latest report to the ASF board:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735
>
> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait.
>
> Bruce
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache
> for my PR feedback and also the generated site output. You can
>> announce the release now.
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 19:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried to build with Jekyll but it failed on my machine.
>&g
the reporter tool unless they show
> important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a
> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the
> prior one without thier effect.
>
> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th rele
that it was a
>> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the
>> prior one without thier effect.
>>
>> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release date.
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, J
0 will
>> be an important milestone with full JDK 9+ support and JMS 2.0 support
>> as well."
>>
>> The example skeleton on reporter.apache.org doesnt include the stats
>> from what I recall as they often asked folks not to include them, so
>> I'd drop t
Hi,
It's done.
Regards
JB
On 20/01/2020 14:16, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone with the relevant permissions please add me as a contributor to
> AMQ JIRA, so that I can assign issues to myself?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colm.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste
ll ActiveMQ 5.9 in Windows server 2012?
> Refer:
> https://activemq.apache.org/getting-started.html#InstallationProcedureforWindows
>
>
> Windows: Windows XP SP2, Windows 2000, Windows Vista, Windows 7.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.c
ave a go at fixing some of the issues.
> My registered email address - piyushchugh1...@gmail.com
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Piyush Chugh
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
h JDK8
or JDK11 at runtime.
2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only
support JDK11 at runtime.
Thoughts ?
Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me
know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime).
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptis
e it easier on ourselves and remove LevelDB entirely as it
> has been deprecated now for several major versions and there isn't any
> reason to keep it at around at this point.
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
t in 5.16.0 instead of waiting til 5.17.0?
>
> Colm.
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Christopher,
>>
>> OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support at runtime.
>>
>> I will focus on JDK11 build
+1 for separate repo. It makes sense.
Regards
JB
Original message
From: Clebert Suconic
Date:10/10/2014 16:20 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ
I'm +1 for a separate repo as long as it's git... we can merge
will
create a 5.10.x maintenance branch and start porting the most relevant
and only compatible fixes.
Thoughts?
Hadrian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
Original message
From: Claus Ibsen
Date:16/01/2015 08:02 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt)
Hi
I gave the RC a test spin with latest Camel source code.
And the sprin
NOTE: I used Hadrian's prior thread as a template (thank you Hadrian).
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-1-3rd-attempt-tp4689959.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Bap
1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
Regards,
Gary.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
Regards
JB
On 01/05/2015 07:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked.
Any objection to rename?
Hadrian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthra
wants to discuss or merge these changes? :-)
Secondly, i want to improve the documentation.
May i have write access to the wiki - i.e. the pages referenced at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5448.
Regards
Marc
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
to have
in ActiveMQ?
Jakub
Cool stuff, definitely seems like something we ought to consider adding.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
cement a few minor versions
later
(who trusts a .0 version anyway?).
If the answer is no
(or not yet) then HornetQ should probably appear as an
ActiveMQ
sub-project, just like Apollo (still) is. HornetQ can evolve there
and
come closer to ActiveMQ "the next generation".
i All,
It was mentioned on another thread that ActiveMQ has hard challenges
with CPU core/thread scaling - I was wondering if there was a test
case/script published some where that shows this issue occurring?
Cheers,
Jamie
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
T
bring HornetQ folks
into
the AMQ PMC. I don't believe that happened (someone please correct me
if I
have it wrong).
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-
tp4693781p4693856.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev ma
com/VOTE-Accept-hornetq-code-grant-and-active-committers-td4685833.html
[2]
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Accept-hornetq-code-grant-and-active-committers-td4686006.html
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
n, we do this
sort of thing already with the persistence providers, so maybe there's
an opportunity here as well.
Thoughts?
James
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
r a 2-3 days if possible. Before I do this, however, I'd
like to know who else is planning to attend.
Bruce
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
hours.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
pache/activemq/pulls ?
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
mple first step. If anyone would like to
contribute something (e.g. a Maven profile) that Jenkins could invoke to
perform this general testing for PRs feel free. I can change the job to
execute any Maven target.
The job is at https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-PR-Build/.
Justin
--
Jean-B
ev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
-support-tp4681089p4697789.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
RegardsJB
Original message
From: Daniel Kulp
Date: 06/08/2015 16:57 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2
This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.2
Staging area:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
g:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=a9eeb03520f074d5013239b8d8708a05ba31e176
Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1
rove this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1 (non-binding)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ed9f6e564
Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1 (non-binding)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
=a820bfb4c5489ed842efc6ef5702f0fc21975c41
Issues resolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333254
This vote will be open till Monday. Here is my +1
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
protocols using:
feature:repo-add
mvn:org.apache.activemq/artemis-features/1.1.1-SNAPSHOT/xml
feature:install artemis-core artemis-hornetq artemis-stomp artemis-mqtt
artemis-amqp
I would be happy about your feedback.
Christian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
ecure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12329848
I was thinking about calling a vote for a release in the 2-3 week time
frame and wanted to see if there were any blockers that would prevent this.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333874
Most importantly, it contains the fix for CVE-2015-5254.
If anyone has any blockers, let me know.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ected. what also covers other questions we had here on this
thread.
--
Clebert Suconic
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Hi
I already have an improved docker image with karaf and ActiveMQ. We have a
discussion at Apache about where to put this.
For now it's on my local server. I don't think it should go directly in the
project.
Regards
JB
On Aug 16, 2016, 09:10, at 09:10, "Ismaël Mejía" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I h
Good idea Hadrian.
I will try to take a look.
Regards
JB
On Oct 23, 2016, 03:48, at 03:48, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>There are a number of old, even very old, PRs open [1]. Some I suspect
>are not relevant anymore. It'd be great if somebody could look into
>them
>and close them down. I will
mmit saying.
> "This closes #NR"
>- by asking infra
>
>
>If the PR is stale you will need to ask infra. As no one outside the
>Apache
>infra have auth to close the PR.
>
>On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>wrote:
>
>> Good idea Hadri
+1
Regards
JB
On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>+1
>
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
>> don't really think anyone will be using it:
>>
>> - aerogear:
>> * It's not workin
t need a closer attentions. I saw that cshannon
merged a PR, I looked at it too, but I am not sure how it was tested as
many test fail intermittently, some just fail and jenkins didn't have a
clean build in a while. I'll look into those too.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 10/23/2016 02:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste
networks.
This is a proof of concept, just to show it’s possible.
I hope this helps others.
Cheers,
Antoine
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
Regards
JB
On Nov 16, 2016, 12:15, at 12:15, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>+1
>
>Regards
>--
>Dejan Bosanac
>http://sensatic.net/about
>
>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Bennet Schulz
>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:16 schrieb Clebert Suconic <
>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>>
rove this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.2
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Agree with Christian. It's a bit unfortunate.
Regards
JB
On Dec 8, 2016, 07:53, at 07:53, Christian Schneider
wrote:
>As artemis is an open source project I would not use a marketing like
>reason for a new major version (like a certain feature set).
>Instead I would use a major version to rem
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Dec 19, 2016, 14:02, at 14:02, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>+1
>
>On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.5
:).
Maybe bring Artemis a bit more up front on the website and make the
look and feel a bit more modern and clean.
Anyone available to help here? :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Agree to create a more generic repo as it could contain different modules in
the future.
Regards
JB
On Feb 1, 2017, 13:45, at 13:45, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>I'm going to ping infra to create a new project but wanted to get some
>feedback from people first. The main motivation for this ut
Yes, it just takes some time for the first sync.
Regards
JB
On Feb 2, 2017, 17:58, at 17:58, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>I believe the mirror should happen automatically within 24 hours.
>
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andy Taylor
>wrote:
>
>> can we get it mirrored in Github?
>>
>> On 2
Hi Christian
It sounds good to me.
Thanks.
Regards
JB
On Feb 7, 2017, 06:38, at 06:38, Christian Schneider
wrote:
>There are some issues supporting the new camel version 2.18.x in
>activemq. See
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6585
>
>In the issue we discussed that it would be bet
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sep 28, 2017, 19:23, at 19:23, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>+1
>
>On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM Robbie Gemmell
>
>wrote:
>
>> On 28 September 2017 at 16:04, Christopher Shannon
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > I have re-created the ActiveMQ 5.15.1 release and it's
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Oct 18, 2017, 12:56, at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>On 17 October 2017 at 15:37, Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.2 release and it's ready for a vote.
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>>
>https://issues.ap
No objection from my side.
Regards
JB
On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce"
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>
>It is possible to make a group account so would p
I still lean to the idea that it would
> be a better use of time to just work on improving the migration and feature
> parity of 5.x with Artemis instead of adding JMS 2.0 support as Artemis
> already supports it. If migration is easier and if all the main 5.x
> features people care about work in Artemis then people could just migrate
> to Artemis.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Hi everyone,
Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0
release to your vote (take #2).
This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK 11.
The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0.
It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much more
airly creates burden on the existing
user base.
Thank you,
-Matt Pavlovich
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
es updates.
I hope to be able to submit the release to vote end of next week.
In the mean time, I will update the log4j2 update on the main branch, heading
to 5.17.0.RC1.
I think a first RC could be available by mid July.
I will keep you posted.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Regards
JB
On 7/17/21 7:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm sorry but I was busy more than expected post relocation ;)
Anyway, I will resume the releases preparation.
About 5.16.3, Matt and I opened several PRs with:
- several dependency updates
- fix/improvement about OSGi an
Hi guys,
as discussed on this thread, 5.16.3 will be submitted to vote tomorrow.
I finished this release preparation.
I would like to take a new look on AMQ-7470 today, but as it's not easy
to identify/reproduce, I might postpone the investigation for 5.16.4.
I also have feedback about secu
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release to your vote.
This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x series,
especially:
- include java.util package in the deserialization enforcement
- logging improvements on STOMP transport
- improvement on Karaf features to avo
ks the assembly
build on some environment due to long file path.
I will fix by using posix instead of gnu.
Sorry about that, I will submit a new vote soon.
Regards
JB
On 06/08/2021 19:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release to your vote.
This releas
+1 (binding)
Just a quick note: the vote section of the email mention 2.4.0, but we
are actually voting on 2.18.0.
Not a big deal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 09/08/2021 20:50, Clebert Suconic wrote:
Just wanted to record my +1.
and update the voting template from previous vote (sorry for t
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release to your vote (take #2). This new
vote fixes the assembly long path issue on some environment (AMQ-8352).
This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x series,
especially:
- include java.util package in the deserialization
101 - 200 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
